RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일본의 금융분야 ADR에 관한 검토 = On the Japanese New Alternative Dispute Resolution System in the Financial Sector

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the past, ADR has not been used as frequently in Japan as it has in other parts of the industrialized world. However, though litigation is still the most utilized vehicle of dispute resolution by Japanese financial institutions, this will be changing. The New Financial ADR system, which was created by a June 2009 amendment to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act , is meant to deal with every stage of financial-related disputes and, as such, strives to resolve disputes before they become significant and acts to ameliorate any post-ADR issues that may remain, thereby completing the FIEA's purpose to protect investors. Since the foundation of the New Financial ADR system applies to all related industries, new provisions were set out in 16 business related acts, such as the Banking Act, the Insurance Business Act, and FIEA itself. October 2010 will mark the formal introduction of a new system of financial ADR in Japan.
    New Financial ADR in Japan will be modeled on the Financial Ombudsman Service in the United Kingdom, but will not feature one comprehensive dispute resolution system in which one dispute resolution institution covers all disputes in the financial field. The New Financial ADR system is merely one step towards a foundation of comprehensive financial ADR such as FOS. It must be noted, however, that this all important first step was over seven years in the making, involving a great deal of discussion, debate, and compromise amongst many parts of Japanese government, business, and society. The New Financial ADR system grants participating parties the ability to stop the clock on any statute of limitations which may correspond to any future possible court cases related to the dispute,13 and further grants the ability to suspend related court proceedings while the parties are utilizing the New Financial ADR system.In addition, where financial institutions have not accepted dispute resolution proceedings or have not accepted a special conciliation proposal, the Ministry of Finance may issue an order compelling compliance if it is found that certain actions are necessary to ensure the appropriate operations of a financial institution's business. In Japan, as best practices have not yet been created.
    번역하기

    In the past, ADR has not been used as frequently in Japan as it has in other parts of the industrialized world. However, though litigation is still the most utilized vehicle of dispute resolution by Japanese financial institutions, this will be changi...

    In the past, ADR has not been used as frequently in Japan as it has in other parts of the industrialized world. However, though litigation is still the most utilized vehicle of dispute resolution by Japanese financial institutions, this will be changing. The New Financial ADR system, which was created by a June 2009 amendment to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act , is meant to deal with every stage of financial-related disputes and, as such, strives to resolve disputes before they become significant and acts to ameliorate any post-ADR issues that may remain, thereby completing the FIEA's purpose to protect investors. Since the foundation of the New Financial ADR system applies to all related industries, new provisions were set out in 16 business related acts, such as the Banking Act, the Insurance Business Act, and FIEA itself. October 2010 will mark the formal introduction of a new system of financial ADR in Japan.
    New Financial ADR in Japan will be modeled on the Financial Ombudsman Service in the United Kingdom, but will not feature one comprehensive dispute resolution system in which one dispute resolution institution covers all disputes in the financial field. The New Financial ADR system is merely one step towards a foundation of comprehensive financial ADR such as FOS. It must be noted, however, that this all important first step was over seven years in the making, involving a great deal of discussion, debate, and compromise amongst many parts of Japanese government, business, and society. The New Financial ADR system grants participating parties the ability to stop the clock on any statute of limitations which may correspond to any future possible court cases related to the dispute,13 and further grants the ability to suspend related court proceedings while the parties are utilizing the New Financial ADR system.In addition, where financial institutions have not accepted dispute resolution proceedings or have not accepted a special conciliation proposal, the Ministry of Finance may issue an order compelling compliance if it is found that certain actions are necessary to ensure the appropriate operations of a financial institution's business. In Japan, as best practices have not yet been created.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전병서, "일본의 최근 ADR 동향" 36 : 2006

    2 김상찬, "일본의 ADR法에 관한 硏究" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 127-160, 2006

    3 고형석, "일본 소비자분쟁과 소송외적 분쟁해결제도에 대한 연구" 한국소비자원 (35) : 19-40, 2009

    4 "금융감독원 보도자료, “2009년도 금융분쟁조정신청관련 소송제기 현황”. 금융감독원"

    5 辻松雄, "銀行とりひき相談所·あつせん委員會" (1887) : 2010

    6 宋尾直彦, "金融商品取引法·關係政府令の解說" (318) : 2008

    7 神田秀樹, "金融商品去來法總論-法の構造と有價證券槪念" (1368) : 2008

    8 野口直秀, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度について" 171 : 2010

    9 中澤則夫, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度(金融ADR制度)の槪說" (1873) : 2009

    10 中澤則夫, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度(金融ADR制度) に關する政令ㆍ內閣部令等の槪要" (1887) : 2010

    1 전병서, "일본의 최근 ADR 동향" 36 : 2006

    2 김상찬, "일본의 ADR法에 관한 硏究" 한국중재학회 16 (16): 127-160, 2006

    3 고형석, "일본 소비자분쟁과 소송외적 분쟁해결제도에 대한 연구" 한국소비자원 (35) : 19-40, 2009

    4 "금융감독원 보도자료, “2009년도 금융분쟁조정신청관련 소송제기 현황”. 금융감독원"

    5 辻松雄, "銀行とりひき相談所·あつせん委員會" (1887) : 2010

    6 宋尾直彦, "金融商品取引法·關係政府令の解說" (318) : 2008

    7 神田秀樹, "金融商品去來法總論-法の構造と有價證券槪念" (1368) : 2008

    8 野口直秀, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度について" 171 : 2010

    9 中澤則夫, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度(金融ADR制度)の槪說" (1873) : 2009

    10 中澤則夫, "金融分野における裁判外紛爭解決制度(金融ADR制度) に關する政令ㆍ內閣部令等の槪要" (1887) : 2010

    11 石戶谷豊, "金融ADR制度の創設と課題-消費者の入場から" (1390) : 2009

    12 辻松雄, "金融ADR制度の創設" (1390) : 2009

    13 犬飼重仁, "金融ADRをいかに機能させるか" 39 (39): 2009

    14 山本和彦, "金融ADRの意義とその可能性" (1887) : 2010

    15 "金融ADRのあるべき姿 -現狀の把握, 金融ADR法制の制度設計, 將來像-" (1887) : 2010

    16 鈴木卓, "金融ADR. in: 最新金融レギュレーション" 商事法務 2009

    17 大森泰人, "詳說 金融ADR制度" 商事法務 2010

    18 日野正晴, "詳解 金融商品去來法" 中央經濟社 2008

    19 飯島一夫, "証券·あつせん相談センタ / FINMAC" (1887) : 2010

    20 松澤登, "英國オンブカマン制度に關する一考察-告知制度を中心に-" (168) : 2009

    21 牧野浩敏, "英國の金融業界における苦情·紛爭の解決-事業者による苦情·紛爭對應と金融ADRに關する動向-" 77 (77): 2009

    22 竹中肇, "生命保險相談所·裁定審査會" (1887) : 2010

    23 竹中肇, "生保の裁判外紛爭解決機關について-生命保險協會「裁定審査會」の今日的役割-" 77 (77): 2009

    24 枝窪步夢, "獨立行政法人國民生活センタ-法の改正について-裁判外紛爭解決手續 (ADR)の導入を中心に" (884) : 2008

    25 犬飼重仁, "海外における金融紛爭解決の現狀と日本への示唆" 2824 : 2009

    26 加藤哲夫, "民事裁判と裁判外紛爭處理. in: 司法制度改革と市民の視点" 成文堂 2001

    27 松澤登, "橫斷的投資サービス法制度に關する一考察-生命保險は金融商品として規制すべぎか-" (605) : 2009

    28 정영수, "日本의 ADR法에 관한 紹介" 중앙법학회 7 (7): 2005

    29 松永邦男, "司法制度改革解說1. 司法制度改革推進法/裁判の迅速化に關する法律" 商事法務 2004

    30 出口正義, "保險監督と苦情處理" 1998

    31 高崎康雄, "イギリスにおける金融オンブカマン制度の改正" 75 (75): 2007

    32 坂本仁一, "そんがいほけん相談室ㆍ損害保險調停委員會等" (1887) : 2010

    33 "http://www.moj.go.jp/KANBOU/ADR/itiran/funsou004.html"

    34 "http://www.jcia.or.jp/adr/index.htm"

    35 "http://www.fsa.go.jp/signi/signitrouble/index.html"

    36 出井直樹, "Q&A 新仲裁法解說" 三省堂 2004

    37 Jonathan Russen, "Financial Services - Authorisation, Supervision, and Enforcement: A Litigator's Guide" Oxford University Press 2006

    38 大川宏, "ADR活用ハンドブック" 三省堂 2002

    39 山本和彦, "ADR仲裁法" 日本評論社 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES KCI등재후보
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 중재연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.1 1.1 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.92 1.316 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼