RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    AHP를 이용한 도시의 삶의 질 비교 = A Comparative Evaluation of Urban Quality of Life Using AHP

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103865955

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Considering the fact that quality of life(QOL) conceptually has objective and subjective attributes but difficulties in measuring the subjective aspect cause a number of studies not to be balanced, this study exploits AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) which has been used for systematic decision making to include the other aspect. As the first step of the process decision making hierarchy model is set by content analysis of the UNDP QOL index and additional review of previous studies. 'Improving urban QOL' is a goal on top, 'Economical QOL', 'Environmental QOL', 'Social QOL' and 'Physical QOL' are dimensions of sub-goal(means objectives), and further decomposition follows.
    AHP shows that the dimensions of economical, physical, environmental and social QOL scored higher respectively. The aim of the model is to measure and prioritize the urban QOL in the two case study cities. The final score of the each city could be computed by integration of relative weights of dimensions for urban QOL. The final score of QOL for city A was 0.6642 and for city B the figure decreased to 0.3358.
    The method of this study could be used in stages of the process of urban planning. First stage is when planners try to have a correct and reliable perspective from the existed conditions of the city. Second stage is when the projects should be investigated to be confirmed for their efficiency. In other words planners can direct the scarce resources towards the aspects of QOL which are more important. And the results revealed that using AHP creates opportunity to involving the different groups in the stage of criteria weighting so that the attitudes of local community could be integrated well to the decision making to be suitable for a new paradigm of participatory and communicative planning.
    번역하기

    Considering the fact that quality of life(QOL) conceptually has objective and subjective attributes but difficulties in measuring the subjective aspect cause a number of studies not to be balanced, this study exploits AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process)...

    Considering the fact that quality of life(QOL) conceptually has objective and subjective attributes but difficulties in measuring the subjective aspect cause a number of studies not to be balanced, this study exploits AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) which has been used for systematic decision making to include the other aspect. As the first step of the process decision making hierarchy model is set by content analysis of the UNDP QOL index and additional review of previous studies. 'Improving urban QOL' is a goal on top, 'Economical QOL', 'Environmental QOL', 'Social QOL' and 'Physical QOL' are dimensions of sub-goal(means objectives), and further decomposition follows.
    AHP shows that the dimensions of economical, physical, environmental and social QOL scored higher respectively. The aim of the model is to measure and prioritize the urban QOL in the two case study cities. The final score of the each city could be computed by integration of relative weights of dimensions for urban QOL. The final score of QOL for city A was 0.6642 and for city B the figure decreased to 0.3358.
    The method of this study could be used in stages of the process of urban planning. First stage is when planners try to have a correct and reliable perspective from the existed conditions of the city. Second stage is when the projects should be investigated to be confirmed for their efficiency. In other words planners can direct the scarce resources towards the aspects of QOL which are more important. And the results revealed that using AHP creates opportunity to involving the different groups in the stage of criteria weighting so that the attitudes of local community could be integrated well to the decision making to be suitable for a new paradigm of participatory and communicative planning.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임정빈, "중요도-성과 분석(IPA)을 통한 삶의 질과 지역이주 간의 관계 분석" 한국인사행정학회 11 (11): 217-242, 2012

    2 박철민, "자치구 주민의 삶의 질 실태 분석 • 평가" 11 (11): 103-123, 1999

    3 유경문, "인구이동의 결정요인에 관한 실증분석: 한국의경우(1966-1985)를 중심으로" 39 (39): 175-196, 1991

    4 이곤수, "삶의 질 관점에서 본 평택시의 정부신뢰" 동아시아연구원 2011

    5 김동윤, "도시의 입지결정요인 추출에 관한 연구" 한국디지털건축·인테리어학회 11 (11): 51-60, 2011

    6 최준호, "광역도시와 인근 중소도시 지역주민간의 상호 이주영향 요인평가: 공공서비스 질 만족도를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 183-203, 2003

    7 Davidson, W. B, "The Relationship between Sense of Community and Subjective Well-being: A First Look" 19 : 246-253, 1991

    8 Megone, C, "The Quality of Life: Starting from Aristotle, In Quality of Life: Perspectives and Politics" Biddles 28-41, 1990

    9 Zebrack, B, "Quality of life for Long-term Survivors of Leukemia and Lymphoma" 18 : 39-59, 2000

    10 McCall, S., "Quality of Life, Soc" 2 : 229-248, 1975

    1 임정빈, "중요도-성과 분석(IPA)을 통한 삶의 질과 지역이주 간의 관계 분석" 한국인사행정학회 11 (11): 217-242, 2012

    2 박철민, "자치구 주민의 삶의 질 실태 분석 • 평가" 11 (11): 103-123, 1999

    3 유경문, "인구이동의 결정요인에 관한 실증분석: 한국의경우(1966-1985)를 중심으로" 39 (39): 175-196, 1991

    4 이곤수, "삶의 질 관점에서 본 평택시의 정부신뢰" 동아시아연구원 2011

    5 김동윤, "도시의 입지결정요인 추출에 관한 연구" 한국디지털건축·인테리어학회 11 (11): 51-60, 2011

    6 최준호, "광역도시와 인근 중소도시 지역주민간의 상호 이주영향 요인평가: 공공서비스 질 만족도를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 183-203, 2003

    7 Davidson, W. B, "The Relationship between Sense of Community and Subjective Well-being: A First Look" 19 : 246-253, 1991

    8 Megone, C, "The Quality of Life: Starting from Aristotle, In Quality of Life: Perspectives and Politics" Biddles 28-41, 1990

    9 Zebrack, B, "Quality of life for Long-term Survivors of Leukemia and Lymphoma" 18 : 39-59, 2000

    10 McCall, S., "Quality of Life, Soc" 2 : 229-248, 1975

    11 Dissart, J, "Quality of Life in the Planning Literature" 15 : 135-161, 2000

    12 Grayson, L, "Quality of Life in Cities: On Overview and Guide to the Literature" The British Library 148-1994, 1994

    13 O'Brien, D. J., "Neighborhood Community and Life Satisfaction" 22 : 20-37, 1991

    14 Ferrel, B. R., "Measurement of the Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors" 4 : 523-531, 1995

    15 UNDP, "Human Development Report" Oxford University Press 240-, 1994

    16 Satty, T. L, "Analytical Hierarchy Process" McGraw-Hill 1980

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2016 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2013-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (등재후보2차)
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-04-03 학회명변경 한글명 : (사)한국디지털건축·인테리어학회 -> 한국디지털건축·인테리어학회 KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2006-04-10 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국디지털건축·인테리어학회 -> (사)한국디지털건축·인테리어학회
    영문명 : Korea Digital Architecture And Interior Association -> Korea Digital Architecture And Interior
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼