RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      퍼스 기호이론의 무용기호학적 적용 연구 = Study on the Dance-Semiotic Application of Peirce`s Theory of Signs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A87901461

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As semiotic theories are deemed to be the most useful methodology to interpret the meaning of dance by typifying and signifying it, this study uses Peirce`s theory of signs. While symbolism Saussure could examine logic structures of language closely and Greimas` semiotic theory is suitable for a epic close examination and dismantlement, Peirce`s theory is thought to be useful for more scientific judgment breaking up the structure of meaning and communication into the sign system as good as dance. As a result, Peirce`s triadic principle of signs has brought about infinite interpretations owing to the action of dance signs and the categories of dance signsenable us to explore the semiotic area of dance and the possibility of various signs including non-verbal messages except linguistic signs. In other words, the semiotic area of dance including kinesics of non-verbal communication can be divided into the semiology of meaning and the semiology of communication, and while the former examines the signification system of dance movement and its interpretations closely, the latter decodes the codes of dance movement and interchanged messages. In order to go beyond the existing impressionistic criticism in interpreting the beauty of dance and making aesthetic judgments, more scientific judgment and methodology are needed. Even though it examines only the inessential phenomena closely, it is certain that semiology is useful scholarship as the methodology for further developments.
      번역하기

      As semiotic theories are deemed to be the most useful methodology to interpret the meaning of dance by typifying and signifying it, this study uses Peirce`s theory of signs. While symbolism Saussure could examine logic structures of language closely a...

      As semiotic theories are deemed to be the most useful methodology to interpret the meaning of dance by typifying and signifying it, this study uses Peirce`s theory of signs. While symbolism Saussure could examine logic structures of language closely and Greimas` semiotic theory is suitable for a epic close examination and dismantlement, Peirce`s theory is thought to be useful for more scientific judgment breaking up the structure of meaning and communication into the sign system as good as dance. As a result, Peirce`s triadic principle of signs has brought about infinite interpretations owing to the action of dance signs and the categories of dance signsenable us to explore the semiotic area of dance and the possibility of various signs including non-verbal messages except linguistic signs. In other words, the semiotic area of dance including kinesics of non-verbal communication can be divided into the semiology of meaning and the semiology of communication, and while the former examines the signification system of dance movement and its interpretations closely, the latter decodes the codes of dance movement and interchanged messages. In order to go beyond the existing impressionistic criticism in interpreting the beauty of dance and making aesthetic judgments, more scientific judgment and methodology are needed. Even though it examines only the inessential phenomena closely, it is certain that semiology is useful scholarship as the methodology for further developments.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이도흠, "현대기호학의 흐름과 새로운 전망" 고려대학교 한국학연구소 19 : 2003

      2 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" 서울: 한양대학교 출판부 2006

      3 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" 서울: 민음사 2003

      4 트라반트, "기호학의 전통과 경향" 서울: 인간사랑 2001

      5 강신덕, "기호에 대한 시대적 고찰" 2000

      6 "Handbook of Semiotics" Indiana Univ Press 1990

      7 Wade Baskin, "Course in General Linguistics" McGraw-Hill 1974

      1 이도흠, "현대기호학의 흐름과 새로운 전망" 고려대학교 한국학연구소 19 : 2003

      2 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" 서울: 한양대학교 출판부 2006

      3 김경용, "기호학이란 무엇인가" 서울: 민음사 2003

      4 트라반트, "기호학의 전통과 경향" 서울: 인간사랑 2001

      5 강신덕, "기호에 대한 시대적 고찰" 2000

      6 "Handbook of Semiotics" Indiana Univ Press 1990

      7 Wade Baskin, "Course in General Linguistics" McGraw-Hill 1974

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.75 0.71 0.723 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼