RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      탈(脫)식민 초기(1945.8~1950.5), 남한국가 엘리트의 아시아기행기(紀行記)와 아시아표상(表象) = In the Early South Korean Post-colonial Days of 1945 through 1950, South Korean Elite`s Travelogues to Asian Region and Representations of the Asia

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      From the race-and region-oriented view of the world, not a few post-colonial South Korean texts conceived the Aisa as the foundational entity for their own identification and development. This meant that the Asia was imagined as an entity alternative to the contemporary hegemon United States of America. This imagination threatened to nullify the epistemology necessary for the construction of the States as a hegemon over East Asia and also South Korea. Faced with this problematics, ruling elite of contemporary South Korean state had to reconstruct the major imagination of the Asia shared by multitudes of South Korean people and actually did so with a veriety of cultural projects and products such as travelogues to the Asia written by South Korean elite in governmental, political, cultural and other realms. As the major imaginations concerned did, the travelogues also spatialized the Asia as the long history and traditional culture. That is, the texts represented the Asia as the entity of long history which shared the common traditional religion, philosophy and culture, and the modern experience that Asian people got victimized by Western colonialism, and accordingly were to unite for their common interest. In a word, The travelogues identified the Asia as the entity of common interests caused by history and culture. At the same time, the travelogues represented the Asia, in terms of `civilization`, the space with no civilization. This civilizational representation was followed by historical representation. That is, the Asia was represented as what it historically belonged to the past, in other words, the ancient or feudal. This temporalization was illustrated in the representation of Egypt, where the country was presented as the old state, and, one step farther, as the ancient one. The imagination of Egypt rendered ancient the Orient represented by Egypt, and the Asia in extension. This series of temporal identification of the Asia meant that the area has stagnated with no historical development. This temporalization of the Asia, in turn, was to represent it as an ahistorical space, and accordingly as the space of no culture insofar as contemporarily culture was conceived as historical achievement of humans. This constructed Asia, however, was never stable nor settled, it was always contested within the text per se. The text contained the fissures and collisions within itself. That is, the text denied the imagined homogeneity of the Asia against its other of the West/Oxident, and even within the self of the Asia. The text represented Asia as the space composed of different races with different cultures. This representation meant that they had no common interest which united them. Ultimately it led to nullification of the Asia as an entity and accordingly the contradiction of the necessity of their solidarity. This nullification and contradiction epistemologically de-constructed the Asia which was contemporarily imagined as the entity alternative to hegemonic America. It is this de-construction that determined one of the political implications of the travelogues. Other implications of the travelogues could be confirmed in their politics that they had the cultural potentials of persuading South Korean masses to embrace the hegemony of the highly modernized States in terms of civilization and modernism. In this sense, what the travelogues constructed constituted the preliminary work for the ultimate construction of the American hegemony over South Korea and the East Asia in extension. With this in mind, we can conclude the travelogues were the cultural products for the ideational justification of the `alliance` of South Korean state with regionally new hegemon in the post-colonial era, the States. Also we can say that the travelogues meant to ideologically justify the positioning of South Korean state in the American bloc with the seemingly trans-racial and -regional ideologies of modernism and civilization. These justifications constituted the political implications of the travelogues to the Asia produced by the contemporary ruling elite in post-colonial and post-War era.
      번역하기

      From the race-and region-oriented view of the world, not a few post-colonial South Korean texts conceived the Aisa as the foundational entity for their own identification and development. This meant that the Asia was imagined as an entity alternative ...

      From the race-and region-oriented view of the world, not a few post-colonial South Korean texts conceived the Aisa as the foundational entity for their own identification and development. This meant that the Asia was imagined as an entity alternative to the contemporary hegemon United States of America. This imagination threatened to nullify the epistemology necessary for the construction of the States as a hegemon over East Asia and also South Korea. Faced with this problematics, ruling elite of contemporary South Korean state had to reconstruct the major imagination of the Asia shared by multitudes of South Korean people and actually did so with a veriety of cultural projects and products such as travelogues to the Asia written by South Korean elite in governmental, political, cultural and other realms. As the major imaginations concerned did, the travelogues also spatialized the Asia as the long history and traditional culture. That is, the texts represented the Asia as the entity of long history which shared the common traditional religion, philosophy and culture, and the modern experience that Asian people got victimized by Western colonialism, and accordingly were to unite for their common interest. In a word, The travelogues identified the Asia as the entity of common interests caused by history and culture. At the same time, the travelogues represented the Asia, in terms of `civilization`, the space with no civilization. This civilizational representation was followed by historical representation. That is, the Asia was represented as what it historically belonged to the past, in other words, the ancient or feudal. This temporalization was illustrated in the representation of Egypt, where the country was presented as the old state, and, one step farther, as the ancient one. The imagination of Egypt rendered ancient the Orient represented by Egypt, and the Asia in extension. This series of temporal identification of the Asia meant that the area has stagnated with no historical development. This temporalization of the Asia, in turn, was to represent it as an ahistorical space, and accordingly as the space of no culture insofar as contemporarily culture was conceived as historical achievement of humans. This constructed Asia, however, was never stable nor settled, it was always contested within the text per se. The text contained the fissures and collisions within itself. That is, the text denied the imagined homogeneity of the Asia against its other of the West/Oxident, and even within the self of the Asia. The text represented Asia as the space composed of different races with different cultures. This representation meant that they had no common interest which united them. Ultimately it led to nullification of the Asia as an entity and accordingly the contradiction of the necessity of their solidarity. This nullification and contradiction epistemologically de-constructed the Asia which was contemporarily imagined as the entity alternative to hegemonic America. It is this de-construction that determined one of the political implications of the travelogues. Other implications of the travelogues could be confirmed in their politics that they had the cultural potentials of persuading South Korean masses to embrace the hegemony of the highly modernized States in terms of civilization and modernism. In this sense, what the travelogues constructed constituted the preliminary work for the ultimate construction of the American hegemony over South Korea and the East Asia in extension. With this in mind, we can conclude the travelogues were the cultural products for the ideational justification of the `alliance` of South Korean state with regionally new hegemon in the post-colonial era, the States. Also we can say that the travelogues meant to ideologically justify the positioning of South Korean state in the American bloc with the seemingly trans-racial and -regional ideologies of modernism and civilization. These justifications constituted the political implications of the travelogues to the Asia produced by the contemporary ruling elite in post-colonial and post-War era.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼