RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    남북관계의 제로섬적 본질 회귀와 한국의 정책방향 분석 = 게임이론과 합리적 모형의 적용

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77026950

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite South Korea's generous so-called Sunshine Policy toward North Korea for about 10 years by previous administrations, the nature of South-North relations, unfortunately, has not changed. Recent vicious escalations of confrontation between South and North Korea are clearly demonstrating the weakness of one-sided non-zero-sum approach by South Korea. Therefore, it would be necessary and useful to revisit the game theory and re-examine the rationality of North Korea to renew South Korea's perspective on North Korea for the feasible and productive policy development.
    Although it would be unpleasant, South Koreans need to face the harsh reality of resilient inertia of zero-sum nature of South-North relations since the Cold War era. They need to recognize this clear nature and develop and support policies to be relevant to it. Because previous South Korean governments have employed too generous policies based on one-sided request of rapprochement and cooperation between two Koreas, South Koreans need to change the direction of policies reflecting the zero-sum nature of South-North relations and increase the weight of the new policies in order to rectify the imbalance in the past.
    In particular, South Korean government should take the policy of waiting for the change of North Korea in itself or the emergence of opportunity which could cause drastic changes of the situation on the Korean Peninsula instead of trying to achieve rapid results regarding North Korea. It should employ three-legged complementing policies at the same time; firstly, to press North Korea's changes from the advantageous position and strong power, secondly, to assist and negotiate with North Korea through humanitarian pressure and economic aid. Lastly, to be fully prepared against North Korea's irrational provocations of possible worst case scenario. Only the wise combination of these policies could ultimately bring changes of North Korea and ensure the long-term productivity of South Korean policies toward North Korea.
    번역하기

    Despite South Korea's generous so-called Sunshine Policy toward North Korea for about 10 years by previous administrations, the nature of South-North relations, unfortunately, has not changed. Recent vicious escalations of confrontation between South ...

    Despite South Korea's generous so-called Sunshine Policy toward North Korea for about 10 years by previous administrations, the nature of South-North relations, unfortunately, has not changed. Recent vicious escalations of confrontation between South and North Korea are clearly demonstrating the weakness of one-sided non-zero-sum approach by South Korea. Therefore, it would be necessary and useful to revisit the game theory and re-examine the rationality of North Korea to renew South Korea's perspective on North Korea for the feasible and productive policy development.
    Although it would be unpleasant, South Koreans need to face the harsh reality of resilient inertia of zero-sum nature of South-North relations since the Cold War era. They need to recognize this clear nature and develop and support policies to be relevant to it. Because previous South Korean governments have employed too generous policies based on one-sided request of rapprochement and cooperation between two Koreas, South Koreans need to change the direction of policies reflecting the zero-sum nature of South-North relations and increase the weight of the new policies in order to rectify the imbalance in the past.
    In particular, South Korean government should take the policy of waiting for the change of North Korea in itself or the emergence of opportunity which could cause drastic changes of the situation on the Korean Peninsula instead of trying to achieve rapid results regarding North Korea. It should employ three-legged complementing policies at the same time; firstly, to press North Korea's changes from the advantageous position and strong power, secondly, to assist and negotiate with North Korea through humanitarian pressure and economic aid. Lastly, to be fully prepared against North Korea's irrational provocations of possible worst case scenario. Only the wise combination of these policies could ultimately bring changes of North Korea and ensure the long-term productivity of South Korean policies toward North Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼