RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    대학교수의 특허활동이 연구활동에 미치는 효과에 대한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77055063

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    최근 대학의 연구 역량이 기술혁신에서 매우 중요한 역할을 한다는 것이 널리 인식되면서 이에 따른 산학협력의 강화가 선진국은 물론 개도국에서도 중요한 정책이슈로 부각되었다. 그러나 국내에서는 다양한 산학협력 프로그램의 강화에도 불구하고 어떤 조건에서 산학협력이 의미 있는 결실을 맺을 수 있는지에 대한 연구는 드물다. 이러한 배경에 따라 선진국에서 이루어지고 있는 대학의 특허활동과 연구활동 사이의 관계에 대한 기존 논의를 보완론과 대체론으로 대별시켜 검토해보았다. 보완론은 자원효과와 마태효과 등을 통해 특허나 논문 활동이 서로 선순환 구조를 이루는 것으로 설명하는 반면, 대체론은 과학자 사회의 근본규범이 비공개문제와 왜곡효과 등으로 논문으로 대변되는 과학활동이 위축될 것을 우려하고 있다. 본 연구는 한국학술진흥재단 DB의 자료추출로 구축한 지난 16년 간 국내 대학교수의 연구활동과 특허활동에 대한 패널데이터를 통해 특허활동이 연구활동에 어떤 영향을 끼쳤는지를 분석해보았다. 분석 결과, 국내 대학교수들의 경력, 소속대학, 전공을 통제하였을 경우, 특허 등록수로 측정된 활동이 출간된 논문수로 측정된 연구활동에 긍정적으로 기여하고 있음을 검증하였다. 이에 따라 향후 학술연구 지원활동에 대한 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다.
    번역하기

    최근 대학의 연구 역량이 기술혁신에서 매우 중요한 역할을 한다는 것이 널리 인식되면서 이에 따른 산학협력의 강화가 선진국은 물론 개도국에서도 중요한 정책이슈로 부각되었다. 그러나...

    최근 대학의 연구 역량이 기술혁신에서 매우 중요한 역할을 한다는 것이 널리 인식되면서 이에 따른 산학협력의 강화가 선진국은 물론 개도국에서도 중요한 정책이슈로 부각되었다. 그러나 국내에서는 다양한 산학협력 프로그램의 강화에도 불구하고 어떤 조건에서 산학협력이 의미 있는 결실을 맺을 수 있는지에 대한 연구는 드물다. 이러한 배경에 따라 선진국에서 이루어지고 있는 대학의 특허활동과 연구활동 사이의 관계에 대한 기존 논의를 보완론과 대체론으로 대별시켜 검토해보았다. 보완론은 자원효과와 마태효과 등을 통해 특허나 논문 활동이 서로 선순환 구조를 이루는 것으로 설명하는 반면, 대체론은 과학자 사회의 근본규범이 비공개문제와 왜곡효과 등으로 논문으로 대변되는 과학활동이 위축될 것을 우려하고 있다. 본 연구는 한국학술진흥재단 DB의 자료추출로 구축한 지난 16년 간 국내 대학교수의 연구활동과 특허활동에 대한 패널데이터를 통해 특허활동이 연구활동에 어떤 영향을 끼쳤는지를 분석해보았다. 분석 결과, 국내 대학교수들의 경력, 소속대학, 전공을 통제하였을 경우, 특허 등록수로 측정된 활동이 출간된 논문수로 측정된 연구활동에 긍정적으로 기여하고 있음을 검증하였다. 이에 따라 향후 학술연구 지원활동에 대한 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The importance of universities' knowledge to industrial innovation have widely pervaded the academia as well as policy communities. During the last three decades, a series of policy measures vitalizing the knowledge-transfer activities of academics have been implemented both in industrialized and industrializing countries. However, The concerns on the industry's influences on the academia have been raised by a group of researchers such as 'Economics of science'.
    Against this background, this paper addresses the issues related to the relationship between the academic research and knowledge-transfer activities. Particularly, based on the 16 years' panel data of Korean academics' patent and paper outputs, the effect of patenting activities on publishing activities is investigated. Moreover, the specific context of Korean academic system as well as general characteristics of academics are considered in the analysis and discussion.
    According to the results, not just the publishing and patenting outputs but their productivities have been dramatically increased during the last 16 years. The main finding is that the patenting activities have a consistent positive effect on the publishing activities of the academics in the estimations of panel models. Based on these results and the discussions, some policy recommendations for university-industry collaboration are suggested.
    번역하기

    The importance of universities' knowledge to industrial innovation have widely pervaded the academia as well as policy communities. During the last three decades, a series of policy measures vitalizing the knowledge-transfer activities of academics ha...

    The importance of universities' knowledge to industrial innovation have widely pervaded the academia as well as policy communities. During the last three decades, a series of policy measures vitalizing the knowledge-transfer activities of academics have been implemented both in industrialized and industrializing countries. However, The concerns on the industry's influences on the academia have been raised by a group of researchers such as 'Economics of science'.
    Against this background, this paper addresses the issues related to the relationship between the academic research and knowledge-transfer activities. Particularly, based on the 16 years' panel data of Korean academics' patent and paper outputs, the effect of patenting activities on publishing activities is investigated. Moreover, the specific context of Korean academic system as well as general characteristics of academics are considered in the analysis and discussion.
    According to the results, not just the publishing and patenting outputs but their productivities have been dramatically increased during the last 16 years. The main finding is that the patenting activities have a consistent positive effect on the publishing activities of the academics in the estimations of panel models. Based on these results and the discussions, some policy recommendations for university-industry collaboration are suggested.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 국문요약
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 검토
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 기초통계
    • 국문요약
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 검토
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 기초통계
    • Ⅳ. 분석결과
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Blumenthal, "Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Sciences: Evidences from a National Survey of Faculty" 277 (277): 1997

    2 Stephan, P. E., "Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from a Survey of Doctorate Recipients" 16 (16): 71-99, 2007

    3 Thursby, J. G., "Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing" NBER 2000

    4 Rahm,D., "University-firm Linkages for Industrial Innovation" Stanford, CA :Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University 1994

    5 Dagnino, R., "University-Industry-Government Relations on the Periphery: The University of Campinas, Brazil" 36 : 229-251, 1998

    6 Brooks, H., "University-Industry Relations: the Next Four Years and Beyond in Branscomb, L.M., Keller, J.H.(eds.), Investing in Innovation: Creating an Innovation Policy That Works" MIT Press, Cambridge 361-399, 1999

    7 Geuna, A., "University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research" Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton. 2000

    8 Bok,D., "Universities in the Marketplace" Princeton University Press, Princeton 2003

    9 Etzkowitz, H, "Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations" London: Cassell Academic 1997

    10 Feller,I., "Universities as Engines of R&D Based Economic Growth - They Think They Can'" 19 : 335-348, 1990

    1 Blumenthal, "Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Sciences: Evidences from a National Survey of Faculty" 277 (277): 1997

    2 Stephan, P. E., "Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from a Survey of Doctorate Recipients" 16 (16): 71-99, 2007

    3 Thursby, J. G., "Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing" NBER 2000

    4 Rahm,D., "University-firm Linkages for Industrial Innovation" Stanford, CA :Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University 1994

    5 Dagnino, R., "University-Industry-Government Relations on the Periphery: The University of Campinas, Brazil" 36 : 229-251, 1998

    6 Brooks, H., "University-Industry Relations: the Next Four Years and Beyond in Branscomb, L.M., Keller, J.H.(eds.), Investing in Innovation: Creating an Innovation Policy That Works" MIT Press, Cambridge 361-399, 1999

    7 Geuna, A., "University Patenting and Its Effects on Academic Research" Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton. 2000

    8 Bok,D., "Universities in the Marketplace" Princeton University Press, Princeton 2003

    9 Etzkowitz, H, "Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations" London: Cassell Academic 1997

    10 Feller,I., "Universities as Engines of R&D Based Economic Growth - They Think They Can'" 19 : 335-348, 1990

    11 Dasgupta, P., "Toward a New Economics of Science" 23 (23): 487-521, 1994

    12 Akrawi,M., "The University and Government in the Middle East, in Claire Nader and A. B. Zalman (eds.), Science and Technology in Developing Countries" London: Cambridge University Press 335-366, 1969

    13 Leydesdorff, L., "The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies" 25 (25): 195-203, 1998

    14 Merton,R., "The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations" University of Chicago Press 1973

    15 Ben-David,J., "The Scientist's Role in Society" Prentice-Hall 1971

    16 Barnes, B., "The Scientific Ethos: A Deviant Viewpoint" 11 : 3-25, 1970

    17 Florida,R., "The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, Not Technology" 15 (15): 1999

    18 Polanyi,M., "The Republic of Science" 1 (1): 54-72, 1962

    19 David P.A., "The Political Economy of Public Science, in Helen Lawton Smith (eds.), The Regulation of Science and Technology" London: Macmillan Publishers 1998

    20 Gibbons, M., "The New Production of Knowledge" London: Sage 1994

    21 Merton,R., "The Matthew Effect in Science II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property" 79 : 606-623, 1988

    22 Merton,R., "The Matthew Effect in Science" 159 (159): 56-63, 1968

    23 Nelson R.R., "The Market Economy and the Scientific Commons" 33 (33): 455-471, 2004

    24 Etzkowitz, H., "The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm" 29 : 313-330, 2000

    25 Slaughter, S., "The Emergence of a Competitiveness R&D Policy Coalition and the Commercialisation of Academic Science and Technology" 21 (21): 303-339, 1996

    26 Freeman,C., "The Economics of Industrial Innovation" London: Pinter 1982

    27 Stephan,P.E., "The Economic of Science" 36 : 1199-1235, 1996

    28 Etzkowitz, H., "The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Relations" 29 : 109-123, 2000

    29 David P.A., "The Digital Technology Boomerang: New Intellectual Property Rights Threaten Global "Open Science" 2000

    30 Martin,B.R., "The Changing Social Contract for Science and the Evolution of the University," in Aldo Geuna, Ammon J. Salter and W. Edward Steinmueler (eds.) Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for funding and Governance" Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2003

    31 Stephan, P. E., "Striking the Mother Lode: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time" New York: Oxford University Press 1992

    32 Bush,V., "Science the Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research" Washington DC: National Science Foundation 1945

    33 Levin, S., "Research Productivity over the Life Cycle:Evidence for Academic Scientists" 81 (81): 1991

    34 Nowotny, H., "Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty" Cambridge, Polity Press 2001

    35 Agrawal, A., "Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer From MIT" 48 (48): 44-60, 2002

    36 Van Looy, "Publication and Patent Behavior of Academic Researchers: Conflicting, Reinforcing or Merely Co-existing" 35 (35): 596-608, 2006

    37 Arora, A., "Public Policy towards Science: Picking Starts or Spreading the Wealth" 79 : 63-76, 1997

    38 Merton,R., "Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapters in the Sociology of Science" 22 (22): 635-659, 1957

    39 Krimsky,S., "Perils of University-Industry Collaboration" 16 (16): 14-15, 1999

    40 Stokes,D., "Pasteur's Quadrant" Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 1997

    41 Blumenthal, "Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry" 335 : 1734-1739, 1996

    42 Breschi S., "Open Science and University Patenting: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Case" 2004

    43 Carayol, N., "Objectives, Agreements and Matching Inscience-Industry Collaborations: Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle" 32 (32): 887-908, 2003

    44 Mitroff,I., "Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of Apollo Moon Scientists" 39 : 579-595, 1974

    45 Balconi, M., "Networks of Inventors and the Role of Academia: An Exploration of Italian Patent Data" 33 (33): 127-145, 2004

    46 Lundvall,B.-Å., "National Systems of Innovation" London: Pinter 1992

    47 Nelson,R.R., "National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis" New York: Oxford University Press 1993

    48 Calderini M., "Is Academic Patenting Detrimental to High Quality Research? An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Scientific Careers and Patent Application" CESPRI, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy 4-, 2004

    49 Calderini, M., "If Star Scientists do not Patent: an Event History Analysis of Scientific Eminence and the Decision to Patent in the Academic World" CESPRI (Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation) Universita' Bocconi, Milano 2004

    50 Calderini, M., "If Star Scientists do not Patent: The Effect of Productivity, Basicness and Impact on the Decision to Patent in the Academic World" 36 : 303-319, 2007

    51 Owen-Smith,J., "From Separate Systems to a Hybrid Order: Accumulative Advantage Across Public and Private Science at Research One Universities" 32 (32): 1081-1104, 2003

    52 Campbell, T. I. Daza, "Faculty and Administrators' Attitudes towards Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University- Industry Relationships" 70 (70): 309-352, 1999

    53 Florida, R., "Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development," in Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R. (eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States" London: MIT Press 589-610, 1999

    54 Cohen, W. M., "Eminence and Enterprise: The Impact of Industry Support on the Conduct of Academic Research in Science and Engineering" Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. 1997

    55 Hicks, D., "Does University-Industry Collaboration Adversely Affect University Research?" 15 (15): 74-75, 1999

    56 Markiewicz, K.R., "Commercializing the Laboratory: The relationship Between Faculty Patenting and Publishing" Haas School of Business 2004

    57 Van Looy, B., "Combining Entrepreneurial and Scientific Performance in Academia: towards a Compounded and Reciprocal Matthew-Effect?" 33 (33): 425-441, 2004

    58 Meyer,M., "Are Patenting Scientists the Better Scholars?: An Exploratory Comparison of Inventor-Authors with Their Non-inventing Peers in Nano-Science and Technology" 352 (352): 1646-1662, 2006

    59 Diamond,A., "An Economic Model on the Life-cycle Research Productivity of Scientists" 6 (6): 1984

    60 Slaughter, S., "Academic Capitalism" Johns Hopkins 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.31 1.31 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.21 1.2 1.278 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼