혁신활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 혁신활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 밝히는 데 있다. 이러한 연구는 1960년대 이후 활발하게 진행되어 왔는데, 이론과 달리, 실증분석에서는 혼재된 결과가 나타났다. 실증분석 결과가 이론과 다른 이유는 많이 있지만, 사용되는 통계와 분석 방법의 차이에 기인하는 바가 크다. 본 연구는 이러한 문제의식의 연장선상에서 통계문제를 최소화하기 위해 노력하였다. 특히, 이용 가능한 통계를 최대한 활용하기 위해, 특허청에서 제공되는 특허 출원건수의 전수통계(1990～2008)를, 연구개발은 한국신용평가기관에서 제공되는 연구개발비용 통계(1990～2008)를 사용하였다. 본 연구의 가장 큰 의의는 바로 방대한 통계작업이라 할 수 있다. 적절한 지표 산정을 위해, 주성분 분석을 활용 하여 혁신성 지수를 산출하였고, 기업 패널분석과 고성장 기업의 분석에 적절한 분위수 추정을 함께 사용하여 다양한 유형의 기업들에게 미치는 효과를 측정하였다. 분석결과를 보면, 패널 분석에서는 혁신활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향이 유의적이지 않지만, 분위수 추정에서는 이와 다른 결론을 도출하였다. 특히, 하위 10%에 해당하는 저성장기업에게는 혁신이 유의하지 않지만, 상위 10%의 고성장 기업에게는 혁신활동이 매우 중요한 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타난다. 혁신활동이 대기업보다 중소 기업에 보다 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타난 점 역시 커다란 시사점이라 할 수 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of research is to reveal the effect of innovation to enterprises' economic performance. The kind of this study has begun since 1960s and lively progressed then. The final theoretical result of the effect of innovation to the performance came positive in compare to the mixed results came out in empirical analysis. There are several reason why empirical results are different to the theoretical results. However the major factor is that of using imperfect statistics and inappropriateness of analysis method.
This study used a population (1990～2008) provided from Korean Intellectual Property Office, KIPO for patent and also used a population (1990～2008) provided from Korea Investors Service, KIS for research and development. The contribution of this study is enormous statistical analysis. This study used principal component analysis made innovativeness index for appropriate index sampling, and made effort to minimize the error by using appropriate quantile regression for both to panel analysis and rapidly developed company analysis.
Dividing the final results into two parts, the growth and the profit, the effect of technological innovation to the firm's growth is not significant to the panel analysis but heavily significant to the upper 10% of high growth firm.
By classifying large company and small and medium enterprise, it is significant to upper 10% of high growth firm for large company and generally significant to small and medium enterprise. But for both lower 10% of low growth firms and 25% of low ranking firms are negatively effected, and for high growth firms larger than the medians are positively effected. Especially for upper 10% of high growth firms are mostly effected. It is more effective to the profitability than the growth.
The effect to the profit for every enterprises are not significant, but effected significant to the larger enterprises than 25% of low ranking enterprises especially most effective to the upper 10% of high-profit enterprises. The analysis for the large company, it was significant and positively effected to the upper 10% of high profit enterprises and 25% of low ranking enterprises, but the negatively effected for the low-profit enterprises. For the small and medium enterprises, it is negatively effected for both 10% of low ranking enterprises and 25% of low ranking enterprises. However it is positively effective and significant for the high ranking enterprises than median, especially for those high growth firms. It is meaningful to recognize significancy by quantile, but more implicative result is to finding more effectiveness to the small and medium enterprises than to the large company.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문요약
• ABSTRACT
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구의 고찰
• Ⅲ. 실증분석 및 분석결과
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신진교, "중소기업의 특성이 기술혁신에 미치는 영향 -대구지역 중소 제조기업을 대상으로" 한국중소기업학회 31 (31): 73-91, 2009

2 이동석, "우리나라 중소기업의 기술혁신능력과 기술사업화능력이 경영성과에 미치는 영향연구" 한국중소기업학회 32 (32): 65-87, 2010

3 박경주, "연구개발비가 기업경영 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국기술혁신학회 9 (9): 842-864, 2006

4 장광순, "기업의 혁신활동과 경영성과와의 관계 - 국내 중소제조업을 중심으로" 한국품질경영학회 38 (38): 512-520, 2010

5 성소미, "기술혁신의 경제분석" 한국개발연구원 1995

6 최정호, "광고비 및 연구개발비 지출이 기업가치에 미치는 영향 : 토빈 q에 의한 실증적 분석" 한국회계학회 (19) : 103-124, 1994

7 Arundel, A., "What percentage of innovations are patented? - empirical estimates for European firms" 27 : 127-141, 1998

8 Carden, S. D, "What global executives think about growth and risk" (2) : 16-25, 2005

9 Pavitt, K, "What do we know about innovation" 33 : 1253-1258, 2004

10 OECD, "Using patent data as science and technology indicatiors"

11 Aunger, R, "Types of technology" 77 : 762-782, 2010

12 Kaplan, S., "Thinking about technology: applying a cognitive lens to technical change" 37 : 790-805, 2008

13 Hall, B. H, "The value of intangible corporate assets : an empirical study of the components of Tobin's Q" University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research 1993

14 Greenhalgh, C., "The value of innovation : The interaction of competition, R&D and IP" 35 : 562-580, 2006

15 Geroski, P. A., "The turnover of market leaders in UK manufacturing industry, 1979～1986" 14 : 141-158, 1996

16 Hall, B. H, "The stock market's valuation of research and development investment during the 1980's" 83 (83): 259-264, 1993

17 Koellinger, P, "The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance- Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe" 37 : 1327-1328, 2008

18 Chen, Y-S, "The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value-the case of US pharmaceutical industry" 77 : 20-33, 2010

19 Shane, H.,, "The relation between patent citations and Tobin's Q in the semiconductor industry" 9 (9): 131-136, 1997

20 Geroski, P., "The profitability of innovating firms" 30 (30): 679-693, 1993

21 Cefis, E., "The persistence of innovative activities : a cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis" 30 : 1139-1158, 2001

22 Megna, P., "The impact of intangible capital on Tobin's Q in the semiconductor industry" 83 (83): 265-269, 1993

23 Evangelista, R, "The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations- A firm-level analysis" 39 : 1253-1263, 2010

24 Ittner, C. D., "The choice of performance measures in ammual bonus contracts" 72 (72): 231-255, 1997

25 Stoneman, P., "Technology adoption and firm profitability" 106 (106): 952-962, 1996

26 Chiu, Y-C, "Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance" 75 : 875-889, 2008

27 Dosi, G, "Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation" 26 (26): 1120-1171, 1988

28 Hay, M., "Small firm growth : intentions, implementation and impediments" 5 (5): 49-68, 1994

29 Pavitt, K, "Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory" 13 : 343-373, 1984

30 Koenker, R., "Regression quantiles" 46 : 33-50, 1978

31 Griliches, Z., "R&D, patents and market valule revisted : Is there a second(technological opportunity) factor" 1 (1): 183-201, 1991

32 Pakes, A, "R&D, Patents and Productivity. In: Patents and R&D at the Firm Level : A First Look" University of Chicago Press 55-72, 1984

33 Katz, M. L., "R&D rivalry with licensing or imitaion" 77 (77): 402-420, 1987

34 Wang, T, "R&D investment and financing choices: A comprehensive perspective" 39 : 1148-1159, 2010

35 Del Monte, A., "R&D and the growth of firms : empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms" 32 : 1003-1014, 2003

36 Cohen, W. M., "Protecting their intellectual assets : appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)" 2000

37 Teece, D, "Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy" 15 : 285-305, 1986

38 Roper, S, "Product innovation and small business growth: a comparison of the strategies of German, UK and Irish companies" 9 : 523-537, 1997

39 Jaffe, A. B., "Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy" MIT Press 2002

40 Wagner, S, "Patents and the survival of Internet-related IPOs" 39 : 214-228, 2010

41 Archibugi, D, "Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review" 19 (19): 357-368, 1992

42 Ernst, H, "Patent information for strategic technology management" 25 (25): 233-242, 2003

43 Griliches, Z, "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators; A Survey" 28 (28): 1661-1707, 1990

44 March, J. G., "Organizational performance as a dependent variable" 8 (8): 698-706, 1997

45 Nelson R. R, "Neoclassical versus Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth" 83 : 886-905, 1974

46 Lang, G, "Measuring the returns of R&D-An empirical study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years" 38 : 1438-1445, 2009

47 Hirschey, M, "Market structure and market value" 58 (58): 89-98, 1985

48 Blundell, R., "Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms" 66 : 529-554, 1999

49 O'Connor, G. C, "Market learning and radical innovation; a cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects" 15 : 151-166, 1998

50 Kamien, M. I, "Market Structure and Innovation : a Summary" 13 (13): 1-37, 1975

51 Kamien, M. I, "Market Structure and Innovation" Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 1982

52 정진수, "KOSDAQ 등록기업의 연국개발비가 기업가치에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 17 (17): 1273-1289, 2004

53 Schmookler, J, "Invention and Economic Growth" Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press 1966

54 Rosenberg, N, "Inside the Black Box" Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1982

55 Toivanen, O, "Innovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989～1995" 64 (64): 39-64, 2002

56 Coad, A., "Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors : A quantile regression approach" 37 : 633-648, 2008

57 Nooteboom, B, "Innovation and diffusion in small firms : theory and evidence" 6 (6): 327-347, 1994

58 Mowery, D. C, "Industrial research and firm size, survival and growth in American manufacturing, 1921～1946 : an assessment" 43 (43): 953-980, 1983

59 Nelson R. R, "In search of Useful Theory of Innovation" 6 : 36-76, 1977

60 Geroski, P. A, "Handbook of the economics of Innovation and Technological Change. In: Markets of technology: Knowledge, innovation and appropriability" Blackwell Publishers, Oxford/Cambridge 90-131, 1995

61 Rothwell, R., "Handbook of Industrial Innovation. In: Innovation and size of firm" Edward Elgar, Aldershot 310-324, 1994

62 Soete, L, "Firm Size and Innovative Activity : the Evidence Reconsidered" 12 (12): 319-340, 1979

63 Mansfield, E, "Entry, Gibrat's law, innovation and the growth of firms" 52 : 1023-1051, 1962

64 Van Reenen, "Employment and technological innovation : evidence from UK manufacturing firms" 15 (15): 255-284, 1997

65 Chen-Chi Lou, "Effects of technical innovation on market value of the U.S. semiconductor industry" 77 : 1322-1338, 2010

66 Hall, B. H., "Does the market value R&D Investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, German, and Italy, Int" 24 (24): 971-993, 2006

67 Landry, R., "Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent" 69 : 681-701, 2002

68 Freel, M. S, "Do small innovating firms outperform non-innovators" 14 : 195-210, 2000

69 Geroski, P. A., "Do innovating firms outperform non-innovators" 7 (7): 79-90, 1992

70 Romijn, H., "Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England" 31 : 1053-1067, 2002

71 Mosteller, F., "Data Analysis and Regression" Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1977

72 Scherer, F. M, "Corporate inventive output, profits and growth" 73 (73): 290-297, 1965

73 Buchinsky, M, "Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963～1987 : application of quantile regression" 62 : 405-458, 1994

74 Levin, R. C., "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D" 78 : 783-820, 1987

75 Nelson R. R, "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" Cambridge MA : Harvard University Press 1982

76 Trajtenberg, M, "A penny for your quotes: patent citations and value of innovations" 21 (21): 172-187, 1990

77 Coad, A, "A closer look at serial growth rate correlation" 31 : 69-82, 2007

78 Lee, C. H, "A Theory of firm growth : Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth" 39 : 278-289, 2010