RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      위법한 비용의 세법상 공제가능성 = 의약품 리베이트의 손금성을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99905815

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The taxable income, generated from the business which the companies or individuals carry on, is calculated by subtracting the total deductible expenses from the total gross income. The corporate tax law specifically stipulates the amounts that correspond to gross income and deductible expenses, and also clearly specifies which amount does not correspond to gross income and deductible expenses.
      The Clause 1 of Article 19 of the Corporate Tax Act, which specifies the conditions for the recognition of loss amount, defines deductible expenses as the amount of losses generated by transactions which cause a deduction in the net assets of a corporation, excluding return of capital or financing, disposition of surplus funds, and other transactions as provided for in this Act. The Clause 2 of the same Act specifies the conditions for the loss amount, stipulating that “the losses shall be the losses or expenses generated or spent in connection with the business of a corporation which are generally accepted as normal or directly related to profit”. In relation to that, there is a controversy over whether illegal expenses cannot be recognized as deductible expenses. That is because the illegal expense is the expense incurred from the business and is directly connected to the profit.
      The Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the inclusion of the loss mount is accepted, unless there is special circumstances such as the disruption to the public policy as a result of the recognition of the illegal expense, thereby presenting the judgement criteria for the recognition of the loss amount. Basically, the Supreme Court of Korea left the room for the judgement that denies the expense in case that there is special circumstances such as the situation where such illegal expense is seriously against the public policy, although the Court recognized the expense affirmatively. The judgement criteria for the recognition of illegal expense has been raised as an issue amid the recent controversy over the different conclusions of the judgement by Seoul High Court of Justice in relation to the recognition of the rebated amount involved in the trade of medicine and medical supplies as the loss amount.
      With regards to the judgement criteria for the recognition of illegal expense as deductible expense, this study intends to present the criteria for determining whether the illegality of expense lies in the purpose or the means. The illegal expense cannot be considered as deductible expense if the illegality of expense lies in the purpose, while illegal expense will be deductible expense if the illegality of expense lies in the means. In relation to the recognition of illegal expense incurred from rebate amount involved in the trade of medicine and medical equipment, the supply of the medicine and medical equipment is not illegal, but the give and take of rebate amount is illegal. Thus, the illegality lies in the means called the rebate, not the medicine and medical equipment which are the object of the purpose. Therefore, in this case, illegal expense can be accepted as deductible expense.
      번역하기

      The taxable income, generated from the business which the companies or individuals carry on, is calculated by subtracting the total deductible expenses from the total gross income. The corporate tax law specifically stipulates the amounts that corresp...

      The taxable income, generated from the business which the companies or individuals carry on, is calculated by subtracting the total deductible expenses from the total gross income. The corporate tax law specifically stipulates the amounts that correspond to gross income and deductible expenses, and also clearly specifies which amount does not correspond to gross income and deductible expenses.
      The Clause 1 of Article 19 of the Corporate Tax Act, which specifies the conditions for the recognition of loss amount, defines deductible expenses as the amount of losses generated by transactions which cause a deduction in the net assets of a corporation, excluding return of capital or financing, disposition of surplus funds, and other transactions as provided for in this Act. The Clause 2 of the same Act specifies the conditions for the loss amount, stipulating that “the losses shall be the losses or expenses generated or spent in connection with the business of a corporation which are generally accepted as normal or directly related to profit”. In relation to that, there is a controversy over whether illegal expenses cannot be recognized as deductible expenses. That is because the illegal expense is the expense incurred from the business and is directly connected to the profit.
      The Supreme Court of Korea ruled that the inclusion of the loss mount is accepted, unless there is special circumstances such as the disruption to the public policy as a result of the recognition of the illegal expense, thereby presenting the judgement criteria for the recognition of the loss amount. Basically, the Supreme Court of Korea left the room for the judgement that denies the expense in case that there is special circumstances such as the situation where such illegal expense is seriously against the public policy, although the Court recognized the expense affirmatively. The judgement criteria for the recognition of illegal expense has been raised as an issue amid the recent controversy over the different conclusions of the judgement by Seoul High Court of Justice in relation to the recognition of the rebated amount involved in the trade of medicine and medical supplies as the loss amount.
      With regards to the judgement criteria for the recognition of illegal expense as deductible expense, this study intends to present the criteria for determining whether the illegality of expense lies in the purpose or the means. The illegal expense cannot be considered as deductible expense if the illegality of expense lies in the purpose, while illegal expense will be deductible expense if the illegality of expense lies in the means. In relation to the recognition of illegal expense incurred from rebate amount involved in the trade of medicine and medical equipment, the supply of the medicine and medical equipment is not illegal, but the give and take of rebate amount is illegal. Thus, the illegality lies in the means called the rebate, not the medicine and medical equipment which are the object of the purpose. Therefore, in this case, illegal expense can be accepted as deductible expense.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 비용의 개념과 세법상 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 위법한 비용에 관한 판례의 검토
      • Ⅳ. 위법한 비용의 손금인정을 위한 판단기준
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 비용의 개념과 세법상 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 위법한 비용에 관한 판례의 검토
      • Ⅳ. 위법한 비용의 손금인정을 위한 판단기준
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 參考文獻
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김상용, "한국법사와 법정책" 화산미디어 2013

      2 한만수, "조세법강의(2012년 신정8판)" 박영사 2012

      3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2011

      4 나성길, "위법소득 과세의 쟁점과 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 3 : 2003

      5 김재승, "위법비용과 손금 -위법비용의 손금성 판단기준에 관한 연구-" 법학연구소 32 (32): 391-432, 2012

      6 이상신, "위법비용과 세법" 한국세법학회 10 (10): 224-255, 2004

      7 이창희, "손금산입 요건으로서의 통상경비" 한국상사판례학회 5 : 2000

      8 오윤, "세법원론" 한국학술정보 2012

      9 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2012

      10 조달영, "법인세법정해" 영화조세통람 2012

      1 김상용, "한국법사와 법정책" 화산미디어 2013

      2 한만수, "조세법강의(2012년 신정8판)" 박영사 2012

      3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2011

      4 나성길, "위법소득 과세의 쟁점과 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 3 : 2003

      5 김재승, "위법비용과 손금 -위법비용의 손금성 판단기준에 관한 연구-" 법학연구소 32 (32): 391-432, 2012

      6 이상신, "위법비용과 세법" 한국세법학회 10 (10): 224-255, 2004

      7 이창희, "손금산입 요건으로서의 통상경비" 한국상사판례학회 5 : 2000

      8 오윤, "세법원론" 한국학술정보 2012

      9 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2012

      10 조달영, "법인세법정해" 영화조세통람 2012

      11 김완석, "법인세법상 손금에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 2002

      12 황남석, "법인세법론" 광교이택스 2013

      13 김재승, "법인세법 제19조의 해석" 한국세법학회 17 (17): 51-82, 2011

      14 이현호, "법인세" 광교이택스 2013

      15 이덕환, "민법총칙" 율곡미디어 2012

      16 김상용, "민법총칙" 삼영사 2013

      17 양형우, "민법의 세계" 진원서 2013

      18 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2012

      19 김규수, "대법원 판례를 중심으로 한 법인세법" 삼일인포마인 2013

      20 이효익, "IFRS 회계원리" 신영사 2013

      21 김영덕, "IFRS 회계원리" 다임 2012

      22 김영덕, "IFRS 중급회계(상)" 다임 2013

      23 송상엽, "IFRS 중급회계" 웅지 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.87 0.87 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.89 0.843 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼