기업의 마케팅 능력과 전략의 관계에 대한 연구 = A Study on the Relationship between Marketing Capabilities and Strategy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Knowledge Management(KM) intending to increase performances by means of improving knowledge productivity has gained attentions recently. KT has run In-house Online web site for Ideas Suggestion since 2010, and could save much cost because over 6,000 employees had suggested over 26,000 ideas in 2010. POSCO has run Entire Enterprise Integration System and adopted employees’knowledge to task. Companies including Samsung group and Woongin group, LG CNS have run or plan for similar web site(2011. 3. 15 Maeil Economy Daily).
Therefore it is necessary to analyze firms’ competitive advantages with the viewpoint of knowledge.
Especially, because capability concept is the very important competitive advantage factor, the integrated study considering both concepts(i.e. knowledge and capabilities) can show more fruitful results. However,I could not find such domestic or foreign studies so far as I know.
For this reason, I intended to analyze marketing capabilities and identify the differences between strategic tendencies and performances. In this study, I analyzed marketing capabilities of companies those were listed on the Korean Securities Exchange market in the side of knowledge creation. At first, I classified marketing capabilities into three sub-constructs, marketing knowledge holding / sharing / infrastructure building and implementing capabilities. and I classified sample companies with the base of Porterʼs generic strategies and investigated the effects of marketing capabilities on firm’s performances in each strategy group. Especially this study used various performance measurements, those were effectiveness, adaptability and efficiency.
This attempt can make up for the drawbacks of prior studies and increase practitional usefulness.
After research, I found that there were differences among firm’s performances according to strategic tendencies. Companies which drove cost leadership strategy gained good efficiency performances and companies which drove differential strategy gained good effectiveness and adaptability performances. In the case of dual strategy, companies gained superior efficiency and effectiveness, adaptability performances to ‘stuck in the middle’ companies. I also found that the relationship between marketing capabilities and performances according to strategic tendencies, especially marketing knowledge sharing capabilities have the close relation to efficiency meanwhile marketing knowledge holding capabilities have the close relation to effectiveness and adaptiveness. These results mean that those companies which want to drive cost leadership strategy should forster marketing knowledge sharing capabilities. So they can achieve superior performance (especially efficiency). In the similar context, those companies which want to drive differential strategy should forster marketing knowledge holding capabilities. So they can achieve superior performance (especially effectiveness and adaptability). However, I found the different result against expected research hypothesis especially in dual strategy group. Maybe this results seems to be stemmed from the nature of dual strategy, exact interpretation can be made on the base of following studies.
And no matter what strategy type company has, the effect of marketing knowledge holding capability on the most performances was the biggest among other marketing capabilities. Therefore, companies which have poor marketing knowledge holding capabilities should post management importance on the achievement of that capabilities. Capabilities can be achieved by the way of in-house innovation or cloning, collaboration,acquisition.
This study has academic and practical implications like belows.
1) Identified the relationships between marketing capabilities and performances in the different view against prior studies.
2) Systematic study on marketing knowledge creation and multidimensional marketing capabilities.
3) Identified the relationships between marketing capab...

국문 초록 (Abstract)

최근 지식생산성을 향상하여 기업의 성과를 높이려는 지식경영이 화두가 되고 있다. 따라서 기업의 경쟁우위도 지식측면에 초점을 두어 분석할 필요성이 있다. 특히 능력개념은 매우 중요한 경쟁우위 요소이므로 이들 개념을 종합적으로 고려한 연구는 더욱 유용한 결과를 보여줄 수 있다.
이러한 이유로 본 연구는 지식창출(knowledge creation) 측면에서 마케팅 능력을 분석하고, 전략적 성향과 기업성과와의 관계를 규명하고자 하였다. 구체적으로는 한국의 거래소 상장기업들의 마케팅 능력을 지식보유능력, 지식공유능력, 지식인프라 구축 및 실행능력의 세 가지 능력 유형으로 개념화한 후 Porter의 본원적 전략에 기초하여 대상 기업을 분류한 다음, 각 전략 그룹 별로 마케팅 능력이 기업의 효과성, 적응성 및효율성에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 이러한 시도는 결과적으로 이론적인 측면에서 기존연구들의 단점을 보완함과 동시에 실무적인 측면에서 본 연구의 유용성을 제고할 수 있을 것이다.
연구 결과 기업의 전략적 성향에 따라 마케팅 능력과 기업성과와의 관계가 차이를 보이며, 특히 마케팅지식 공유능력은 효율성과, 마케팅 지식 보유능력은 효과성이나 적응성과 밀접한 관계가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 한편, 듀얼전략의 경우는 예상하였던 연구가설과는 다른 결과가 나타났는데, 이는 듀얼전략의 복합적인성격에 기인하는 것으로 해석된다. 또한 전략유형에 관계없이 대부분의 기업성과에 있어서 마케팅 지식 보유능력의 영향력이 가장 크게 나타나, 동 능력의 획득문제에 기업들이 관심을 가져야 함을 시사하고 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이성민, "지속가능한 신경세포형의 관광지 개발전략-설악국립공원사례를 중심으로" 한국기업경영학회 18 (18): 239-254, 2011

2 이춘근, "조직능력과 지식창출" 고려대학교 2000

3 고인곤, "우월한 기업성과를 위한 전제조건으로서의 전략 선택에 관한 실증적 연구; 다면적 기업성과 및 산업분석" 한국상업교육학회 17 : 243-266, 2007

4 매일경제, "아이디어 하나로 34억 절감"

5 고인곤, "신제품 개발성과의 영향요인에 대한 실증적 연구" 한국기업경영학회 109-124, 2007

6 고인곤, "비상장 중소기업은 상장기업을 벤치마킹해야 하는가? - 전략적 성향에 대한 비교연구 -" 한국기업경영학회 16 (16): 183-203, 2009

7 고인곤, "마케팅 능력과 기업의 신제품 개발성과에 대한 연구 : 마케팅 지식창출을 중심으로" 한국상업교육학회 24 (24): 213-238, 2010

8 Haas, M. R, "When Using Knowledge can Hurt Performance: The Value of Organizational Capabilities in a Management Consulting Company" 26 : 1-24, 2005

9 Campbell-Hunt,C, "What Have We Learned about Generic Competitive Strategy? A Meta-Analysis" 21 (21): 127-154, 2000

10 Hofer,C, "Turnaround Strategies" 1 (1): 19-31, 1980

11 Mizik, N, "Trading off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation:The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis" 67 : 63-76, 2003

12 Johnson, J. L., "The Role of Relational Knowledge Stores in Interfirm Partnering" 68 : 21-36, 2004

13 Weerawardena,J, "The Role of Marketing Capability in Innovation-Based Competitive Strategy" 11 : 15-35, 2003

14 Pitt, L. F, "The Role of Adaptation in Micro Enterprise Development:A Marketing Perspective" 5 (5): 137-155, 2000

15 Hunt, S. D, "The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions" 60 (60): 107-114, 1996

16 Nonaka, I, "The Knowledge Creating Company" Oxford University Press 1995

17 Narver, J. C, "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability" 54 : 20-35, 1990

18 Peteraf,M.A, "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage; A Resource-Based View" 14 (14): 179-191, 1993

19 O’Farrell, P. N, "The Competitiveness of Business Services and Regional Development: Evidence from Scotland and the South East of England" 30 (30): 1629-1652, 1993

20 Hunt, S. D, "The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition" 59 : 1-15, 1995

21 Day,G.S, "The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations" 58 : 37-52, 1994

22 Kim, E, "Testing the Applicability of Porter’s Generic Strategies in the Digital Age:A Study of Korean Cyber Malls" 21 (21): 19-44, 2004

23 Ghemawat,P, "Sustainable Advantage" 64 (64): 53-58, 1986

24 Dutta, S, "Sucess in High-Technology Markets:Is Marketing Capability Critical" 18 (18): 547-568, 1999

25 Homburg, C., "Strategic Consensus and Performance:The Role of Strategy Type and Market-Related Dynamism" 20 (20): 339-357, 1999

26 Dyer, J. H, "Relation Specific Capabilities and Barriers to Knowledge Transfers:Creating Advantage Though Network Relationships" 27 (27): 701-719, 2006

27 Nunnally,J.C, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill 1967

28 Cottrell, T, "Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Micro computerware Industry" 25 (25): 1005-1025, 2004

29 Clark, K. B, "Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry" Harvard Business School Press 1991

30 Kline,R.B, "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling" Guilford Press 1998

31 Kumar, K, "Porter’s Strategic Types:Differences In Internal Processes And Their Impact On Performance" 14 (14): 107-124, 1998

32 Anderson, P, "Patterns of Capability Acquisition in Electronic Commerce" 12 : 97-109, 2004

33 Miles, R. E, "Organizational Strategy,Structure and Process" McGraw-Hill Book Company 1978

34 Tuominen, M, "Organizational Innovation Capability:A Driver for Competitive Superiority in Marketing Chan nels" 14 (14): 277-293, 2004

35 Kusunoki, K, "Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms:A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings" 9 (9): 699-718, 1998

36 Bagozzi, R. P, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988

37 Pedhazur,E.J, "Multiple regression inn behavioral research: Explanation and prediction" Holt, Rinehart,and Winston 1997

38 Walker, O. C, "Marketing’s role in the Implementation of Business Strategies:A Critical review and Conceptual framework" 51 : 15-33, 1987

39 White, C. J, "Marketing Strategy Development Styles,Implementation Capability, and Firm Performance: Investigating the Curvilinear Impact of Multiple Strategy-Making Styles" 14 (14): 111-124, 2003

40 Hooley, G, "Marketing Capabilities and Firm Performance:A Hierarchical Model" 4 : 259-278, 1999

41 De Luca, "Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining th Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance" 71 : 95-112, 2007

42 Cooper, R. G, "Major New Product:What Distinguishes the Winners the Chemistry Industry" 10 : 90-111, 1993

43 Pelham, A. M, "Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance" 24 (24): 27-43, 1996

44 Sharkie,R, "Knowledge Creation and its Place in the Development of Sustainable Competitive Advantage" 7 (7): 20-31, 2003

45 McDonough,E.F.Ⅲ, "Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Team" 17 (17): 221-235, 2000

46 Leonard-Barton, D, "How to Integrate Work and Deepen Expertise" 72 (72): 121-130, 1994

47 Barney,J, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

48 Veliyath, R, "Firm Capabilities,Business Strategies, and Hypercompetitive Arenas: The Sustainability of Competitive Advantages with Implications for Firm Competitiveness" 10 (10): 56-82, 2000

49 Zinger, T. J, "Factors Influencing Early Stage Performance in Canadian Micro-enterprises" 6 (6): 129-150, 2001

50 Morgan, N. A, "Experiential and Informational Knowledge, Architectural Marketing Capabilities, and the Adaptive Performance of Export Ventures: A Cross-National Study" 34 (34): 287-321, 2003

51 Vargo, S. L, "Evolving to a Mew Dominant Logic for Marketing" 68 : 1-17, 2004

52 Fornell, C, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 : 39-50, 1981

53 Ebben, J. J, "Efficiency,Flexibility,or Both? Evidence Linking Strategy to Performance in Small Firms" 26 (26): 1249-1259, 2005

54 Eisenhardt, K. M, "Dynamic Capabilities:What are They" 21 (21): 1105-1121, 2000

55 Hill,C.W, "Differentiation Versus Low Cost or Differentiation and Low Cost:A Contingency Framework" 13 (13): 401-412, 1988

56 Dean, T, "Differences in Large and Small Firm Responses to Environmental Context: Strategic Implications from a Comparative Analysis of Business Formations" 19 (19): 709-723, 1998

57 Joshi, A. W, "Customer Knowledge Development:Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance" 68 : 47-59, 2004

58 Valle, S, "Cross-Functionality and Leadership of the New Product Development Teams" 6 (6): 32-47, 2003

59 Porter,M.E, "Competitive Strategy" Free Press 1980

60 Porter,M.E, "Competitive Advantage" Free Press 1985

61 Vorhies, D. W, "Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage" 69 : 80-94, 2005

62 Song, X. M, "Antecedents and Consequences of Cross-Functional Cooperation: A Comparison of R&D, Manufacturing and Marketing Perspective" 14 : 35-47, 1997

63 Vorhies,D.W, "An Investigation of the Factors Leading to the Development of Marketing Capabilities and Organizational Effectiveness" 6 : 3-23, 1998

64 Von Krogh, G., "An Essay on Corporate Epistemology" 15 (15): 53-72, 1994

65 Anderson,J.C, "An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties" 33 : 535-541, 1987

66 Marinova,D, "Actualizing Innovation Effort:The Impact of Market Knowledge Diffusion in a Dynamic System of Competition" 68 : 1-20, 2004

67 Wheelwright, S. C, "Accelerating the Design-Build-Test Cycle for Effective Product Development" Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, Irwin 859-868, 1992

68 Verona,G, "A Resource-Based View of Product Development" 24 (24): 132-142, 1999

69 Collis,D.J, "A Resource-Based Analysis of Global Competition:The Case of The Bearings Industry" 12 : 49-68, 1991