형법 제53조의 개정방안 = Method to Reform Article 53 of Criminal Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to the present law, crime extenuation enables for judges to extenuate up to the half of statutory punishment - from the minimum several months to the maximum five years - based on their random decision even when there is no specific reason of extenuation. Thus, crime extenuation may cause sentencing to be recognized to be a merciful measure by a judge, induce imbalance in sentencing, and serve as one of the causes of privileges of former post or paternal judgement, leading to argument that the existing crime extenuation should be abolished. However, because statutory punishment established by lawmakers is based on typical cases of the relevant crime types, there should be possibilities that a punishment out of the lower limit of statutory punishment can be sentenced in an individual case. Also, as for crimes whose statutory punishment is extremely strict by special laws, crime extenuation should be maintained in order to sentence punishment responding to illegality and accountability of the accused. However, although the existing crime extenuation is a system that rules considerable duration of punishment for the accused, it is undesirable that the system is based on random judgement by judges. Although discretion of judged can be allowed in order to secure appropriateness of sentencing in a specific case, the discretion should be within the limit of laws as a part of the application of a law. The purpose of this study is to analyze cases of application of crime extenuation to identify problems, and to review foreign cases of legislation having similar system with crime extenuation and improvements in the system. The measures of improvement by the author are as follows.
First, crime extenuation shall be titled to be "extenuation by circumstances." Second, there shall be four reasons of extenuation by circumstances. Third, extenuation by circumstances shall be a fourth of statutory punishment and only one repetition of extenuation shall be allowed. Finally, reasons of extenuation by circumstances shall be stated in the ruling so that right to appeal of a party shall be secured and ex post control shall be possible.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신양균, "형법총칙개정의 기본방향" 한국형사법학회 22 (22): 19-45, 2010

2 이태훈, "형법총칙 비교법 자료집" 한국형사정책연구원 391-392, 2006

3 신동운, "형법총론 제5판" 법문사 2010

4 정성근, "형법총론" 삼지원 674-, 2008

5 김성돈, "형법총론" 성균관대학교 출판부 765-, 2009

6 오영근, "형법총론" 박영사 780-, 2009

7 장영민, "형법개정의 기본방향 - 한국형사법학회의 2010년 형법개정시안을 중심으로 -" 한국형사법학회 22 (22): 3-18, 2010

8 허일태, "현행법상 작량감경제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국형사법학회 22 (22): 281-304, 2010

9 손철우, "우리나라 양형현황에 관한 기초보고" 양형위원회 2-, 2008

10 이주형, "우리나라 양형관행의 일반적 문제점" 양형위원회 35-, 2008

11 최석윤, "양형에 대한 기초적 이해" 8 (8): 303-, 1997

12 이천현, "양형관련 규정의 정비방안" 한국형사정책연구원 79-, 2006

13 노명선, "실무운영사례를 통하여 본 작량감경규정의 비판적 고찰 및 개선방안" 법무부 85-103, 2010

14 이현정, "성폭력범죄의 양형에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 2009

15 박강우, "대법원 양형기준안과 바람직한 양형개혁의 방향" 한국법학원 (114) : 206-229, 2009