RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    자본시장법상의 과징금 법제의 현황과 과제 = The Present Situation and the Subject of Penalty Surcharge in Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act - Focused on imposing penalty surcharge against disclosure violation -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82340355

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today, penalty surcharge system is important as a means of securing effectiveness for administration. Penalty surcharge on violation in public disclosure also contributes to the aim of Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act which tries to ensure fairness of securities issuance and securities trade and other dealings. It can achieve disincentive effect against disclosure violation without the load of criminal sanction, and can enhance effective enforcement in being combined with other sanction means, and it can procure the immediacy and efficiency of execution by leading of Financial Services Commission. Although more than a decade have passed since penalty surcharge system had been introduced in securities exchange act, there are so few research about it. Therefore, this artic1e introduce U.S and Japanese, and then produce following ways of improving the system. First, there must be a objective standard to decide on whether penalty surcharge will be imposed. Second, the relationship of penalty surcharge and criminal sanction and administrative sanction is set up to prevent attack called as over punishment. Third, legal basis about reduction/exemption grounds of penalty surcharge must be cleared Fourth, standard amount to impose as penalty surcharge should be organized logically. Fifth, the standard of material facts must be prepared. Finally, there must be market abuse provision and based provision to adjust penalty surcharge and fine as shown in examples of United Kingdom and Japan.
    번역하기

    Today, penalty surcharge system is important as a means of securing effectiveness for administration. Penalty surcharge on violation in public disclosure also contributes to the aim of Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act which tries t...

    Today, penalty surcharge system is important as a means of securing effectiveness for administration. Penalty surcharge on violation in public disclosure also contributes to the aim of Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act which tries to ensure fairness of securities issuance and securities trade and other dealings. It can achieve disincentive effect against disclosure violation without the load of criminal sanction, and can enhance effective enforcement in being combined with other sanction means, and it can procure the immediacy and efficiency of execution by leading of Financial Services Commission. Although more than a decade have passed since penalty surcharge system had been introduced in securities exchange act, there are so few research about it. Therefore, this artic1e introduce U.S and Japanese, and then produce following ways of improving the system. First, there must be a objective standard to decide on whether penalty surcharge will be imposed. Second, the relationship of penalty surcharge and criminal sanction and administrative sanction is set up to prevent attack called as over punishment. Third, legal basis about reduction/exemption grounds of penalty surcharge must be cleared Fourth, standard amount to impose as penalty surcharge should be organized logically. Fifth, the standard of material facts must be prepared. Finally, there must be market abuse provision and based provision to adjust penalty surcharge and fine as shown in examples of United Kingdom and Japan.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 과징금의 법적 성질
    • Ⅲ. 주요국의 입법례
    • Ⅳ. 자본시장법상의 과징금 제도
    • Ⅴ. 과징금 법제의 개선과제
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 과징금의 법적 성질
    • Ⅲ. 주요국의 입법례
    • Ⅳ. 자본시장법상의 과징금 제도
    • Ⅴ. 과징금 법제의 개선과제
    • Ⅵ. 맺음말
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼