김홍도 생애의 재구성 = Reconstructing the Life of Kim Hongdo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Despite few official records about the court painter Kim Hongdo(金弘道, 1745-1806), there has been much biographical research on the artist. Yet, there remain some parts of his lineage that require revision. This study presents the first comprehensive research on Kim Hongdo that reconstruct Kim’s life based on newly discovered historical texts, thereby bringing the artist to light as a literati-style court painter, a newly created type of artist during the Joseon period.
Kim Hongdo was born to a family of the military official class that used to be wealthy. He seems to have learned painting from the literati painters Kang Sehwang and Sim Sajeong in his teen years, and was recommended by the prominent artist Kim Hiseong to become a court painter at the Royal Bureau of Painting. Kim Hongdo was not a mere court painter performing to the duties of an artisan from a miscellaneous department of the court. Rather, he obtained prominence as a literati-style court painter for bringing the foremost literary theory to his concept of painting: that art’s creativeness is about being naturally inspired from heaven. Kim Hongdo incorporated his theory of art into the arts for cultivation: poetry, calligraphy, painting, and music. He also integrated the concept of delivering both the spirit and likeness of forms in his painting. With these talents Kim was able to become the special artist working solely for the king, and also gained an unparalleled reputation among scholar officials and those of the middle class who were the privileged leaders of art culture. However, owing to the fact that Kim Hongdo had to live as a low official for over ten years in his 30s, 40s and early 50s, his excessive desires for appreciating art as well as his drinking habits brought about poverty and sickness in his later years. Starved and sick at sixty-one years old, Kim Hongdo moved to where his former student and junior court painter Pak Yuseong was a local painter official in Jeolla province in 1805. Kim seems to have passed away one year later.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 출생과 성장
• Ⅲ. 화원으로 임용과 활동
• Ⅳ. 士能 시절
• Ⅴ. 檀園 시절
• Ⅵ. 만년
• Ⅶ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김수진, "不染齎 金喜誠의 山水畵 硏究" 한국미술사학회 258 (258): 141-170, 2008

2 홍선표, "화원의 형성과 직무 및 활동, In 조선화원대전" 삼성미술관 리움 2011

3 박효은, "홍성하 소장본 김광국의 『석농화원』에 관한 고찰" 5 : 1999

4 변영섭, "표암 강세황 회화연구" 일지사 1988

5 홍선표, "조선시대 회화사론" 문예출판사 1999

6 홍선표, "뿌리 깊은 나무, 남도의 전통회화, In 남도 묵향 내일을 가다- 100년의 전통과 정신" 광주시립미술관 2011

7 최순우, "복헌백화시화합벽첩고" 76 : 1966

8 최순우, "단원 김홍도의 在世年代考" 11 : 1966

9 이동주, "단원 김홍도-그 생애와 작품" 4 : 1973

10 유홍준, "단원 김홍도- 조선적인, 가장 조선적인 불세출의 화가" 22 : 1993

11 오주석, "단원 김홍도- 조선적인 너무나 조선적인 화가" 열화당, 솔 1998

12 유홍준, "단원 김홍도 연구 노트- 단원의 연보와 작가상 규명을 위한 열가지 변증, In 단원 김홍도" 국립중앙박물관 1990

13 진준현, "단원 김홍도 연구" 일지사 1999

14 최완수, "단원 김홍도" 59 : 2000

15 정양모, "단원 김홍도" 중앙일보사 1985

16 이동주, "김단원이라는 화원" 1969

17 홍선표, "국사형 미술사의 영욕: 조선 후기 회화의 해석과 평가 문제" 한국미술연구소 33 (33): 7-28, 2011

18 黃胤錫, "頤齋亂藁"

19 申光河, "震澤集"

20 姜世晃, "豹菴遺稿"

21 權常慎, "西漁遺稿"

22 李睟光, "芝峯類說"

23 成海應, "硏經齋全集續集"

24 李用休, "炭攵曼攵集"

25 丁範祖, "海左集"

26 吳世昌, "槿域書畵徵"

27 李裕元, "林下筆記"

28 "日省錄"

29 沈象奎, "斗室存稿尺牘"

30 "承政院日記"

31 "弘齋全書"

32 鄭克淳, "序尹公遺稿"

33 李晩秀, "屐園遺稿"

34 南周獻, "宜齋集"

35 馬聖麟, "安和堂私集"

36 洪元燮, "太湖集"

37 趙熙龍, "壺山外記"

38 "內閣日曆"

39 李奎象, "一夢稿"