RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등학교 교사의 과학 평가 전문성에 대한 자가진단 내용 분석 = Analysis of Elementary School Teachers` Self-diagnosis on Their Competency for Assessment in Science

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100727954

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this study, we analyzed elementary school teachers’ self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. A questionnaire was administered to 217 elementary school teachers and in-depth group interviews with 6 teachers were also conducted. The results revealed that the mean scores of five subcategories, ‘choosing assessment methods’, ‘developing assessment instruments’, ‘administering, scoring, and grading’, ‘analyzing, interpreting, using, and communicating assessment results’, and ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’, were 3.82, 3.50, 3.92, 3.76, and 4.09 on a scale of 5 points, respectively. Teachers having more teaching experience showed higher mean scores in all subcategories. However, only the teachers having more than 20 years of teaching experience were statistically better than those having less than 5 years of teaching experience in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. There were no significant differences in terms of major, whereas the mean scores of the teachers having master’s degree were statistically higher than their counterpart in some subcategories. In addition, the teachers who had completed training for assessment exhibited statistically higher mean scores than their counterpart in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
      번역하기

      In this study, we analyzed elementary school teachers’ self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. A questionnaire was administered to 217 elementary school teachers and in-depth group interviews with 6 teachers were also conducted...

      In this study, we analyzed elementary school teachers’ self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. A questionnaire was administered to 217 elementary school teachers and in-depth group interviews with 6 teachers were also conducted. The results revealed that the mean scores of five subcategories, ‘choosing assessment methods’, ‘developing assessment instruments’, ‘administering, scoring, and grading’, ‘analyzing, interpreting, using, and communicating assessment results’, and ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’, were 3.82, 3.50, 3.92, 3.76, and 4.09 on a scale of 5 points, respectively. Teachers having more teaching experience showed higher mean scores in all subcategories. However, only the teachers having more than 20 years of teaching experience were statistically better than those having less than 5 years of teaching experience in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. There were no significant differences in terms of major, whereas the mean scores of the teachers having master’s degree were statistically higher than their counterpart in some subcategories. In addition, the teachers who had completed training for assessment exhibited statistically higher mean scores than their counterpart in four subcategories except for ‘recognizing ethics in assessment’. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고민석, "초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제" 대한지구과학교육학회 6 (6): 124-135, 2013

      2 노태희, "초등교사의 구성주의적 과학 평가관 및 관련 변인 탐색" 한국초등과학교육학회 28 (28): 352-360, 2009

      3 Kim, K., "중등학교의 성취평가제 운영 방안 연구" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation 2012

      4 Nam, M., "교사의 학생평가 전문성 신장 연구(III)" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation 2006

      5 이양구, "교사의 체육수업 평가에 대한 전문성 연구" 한국체육교육학회 16 (16): 65-75, 2011

      6 장수미, "교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 21 (21): 227-239, 2002

      7 Kwon, J. -S., "과학교육론" Kyoyookbook Publication Co 2012

      8 조희형, "과학교사 교수내용지식(PCK)의 재구성과 적용 방법" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 618-632, 2008

      9 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "과학과교육과정"

      10 김경미, "과학과 평가 영역간의 중요도에 관한 교사들의 인식에 관한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 22 (22): 540-549, 2002

      1 고민석, "초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제" 대한지구과학교육학회 6 (6): 124-135, 2013

      2 노태희, "초등교사의 구성주의적 과학 평가관 및 관련 변인 탐색" 한국초등과학교육학회 28 (28): 352-360, 2009

      3 Kim, K., "중등학교의 성취평가제 운영 방안 연구" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation 2012

      4 Nam, M., "교사의 학생평가 전문성 신장 연구(III)" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation 2006

      5 이양구, "교사의 체육수업 평가에 대한 전문성 연구" 한국체육교육학회 16 (16): 65-75, 2011

      6 장수미, "교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 21 (21): 227-239, 2002

      7 Kwon, J. -S., "과학교육론" Kyoyookbook Publication Co 2012

      8 조희형, "과학교사 교수내용지식(PCK)의 재구성과 적용 방법" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 618-632, 2008

      9 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "과학과교육과정"

      10 김경미, "과학과 평가 영역간의 중요도에 관한 교사들의 인식에 관한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 22 (22): 540-549, 2002

      11 Kim, S. -Y., "The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropriate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum" 9 (9): 213-232, 2005

      12 Choi, K., "The effects of formative assessment with detailed feedback on students' science achievement, attitude, and interaction between teacher and students" 20 (20): 479-490, 2000

      13 Kim, D. -Y., "The development of a self-diagnostic program for improving science teachers' competency in student assessment - Centering on earth science contents -" Seoul National University 2006

      14 Falk, A., "Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science : Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge" 96 (96): 265-290, 2012

      15 American Federation of Teacher, "Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students" 9 (9): 30-32, 1990

      16 Park, S., "Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) : PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals" 38 (38): 261-284, 2008

      17 Veal, W. R., "Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies" 3 (3): 1999

      18 Kim, J. Y., "Elementary teachers' understanding and practice on science performance assessment" Daegu National University of Education 2005

      19 Min, H. J., "Development of assessment expertise model through analyzing realities of science teacher's student assessment and teacher training" Korea National University of Education 2012

      20 McMillan, J. H., "Classroom assessment principle and practice for effective instruction" Allyn & Bacon 2004

      21 Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning" 5 (5): 7-74, 1998

      22 Kim, H. -J., "An investigation on science teachers' evaluation practices in the secondary schools" 20 (20): 101-111, 2000

      23 Kim, S., "A study on the teacher's competence for classroom assessment" 15 (15): 151-171, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.28 1.783 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼