RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정보시스템 인퓨전(Infusion)에 대한 연구: 사회-기술적 체계 관점 = Investigating Information System Infusion: A Socio-Technical System Perspective

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82765751

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Many organizations have spent huge investments on information systems (IS) but are unable to achieve the maximum benefits expected. The problem of system underutilization of implemented IS is a major factor that causes the lackluster returns on organizational investments in IS. In light of the need for solutions to underutilization, researchers are beginning to explore IS infusion to enhance task performance. IS infusion is the extent to which an individual fully uses the system to enhance his or her task performance. So far, there has yet to be any significant finding or theory to explain the phenomenon. Therefore this study offers a conceptual framework on IS infusion based on the socio-technical system perspective. Particularly, this study investigates the influence of job fit, task competence, technology competence, self-determination with technology and self-determination with task on IS infusion. The analysis following the collection of empirical data found that job fit and self-determination with technology are positively related to IS infusion. This study serves as a basis for future research and suggests important implication to managers and system designers in promoting IS infusion.
    번역하기

    Many organizations have spent huge investments on information systems (IS) but are unable to achieve the maximum benefits expected. The problem of system underutilization of implemented IS is a major factor that causes the lackluster returns on organi...

    Many organizations have spent huge investments on information systems (IS) but are unable to achieve the maximum benefits expected. The problem of system underutilization of implemented IS is a major factor that causes the lackluster returns on organizational investments in IS. In light of the need for solutions to underutilization, researchers are beginning to explore IS infusion to enhance task performance. IS infusion is the extent to which an individual fully uses the system to enhance his or her task performance. So far, there has yet to be any significant finding or theory to explain the phenomenon. Therefore this study offers a conceptual framework on IS infusion based on the socio-technical system perspective. Particularly, this study investigates the influence of job fit, task competence, technology competence, self-determination with technology and self-determination with task on IS infusion. The analysis following the collection of empirical data found that job fit and self-determination with technology are positively related to IS infusion. This study serves as a basis for future research and suggests important implication to managers and system designers in promoting IS infusion.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Munro, M.C., "Understanding and Measuring User Competence" 33 : 45-57, 1997

    2 Deci, E.L., "The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior" 53 (53): 1024-1037, 1987

    3 Gecas, V. W. R. Scott, "The Social Psychology of Self-Efficacy" 15 : 291-316, 1989

    4 Saga, V.L., "The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology" 67-86, 1994

    5 Ritter, T., "The Impact of A Company’s Business Strategy on Its Technological Competence, Network Competence and Innovation Success" 57 : 548-556, 2004

    6 Speier, C., "The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies" 55 : 2002

    7 Fisher, C.D., "The Effects of Personal Control, Competence, and Extrinsic Reward Systems on Intrinsic Motivation" 21 : 273-288, 1978

    8 Stone, D.L., "The Effects of Feedback Consistency and Feedback Favorability on Self-Perceived Task Competence and Perceived Feedback Accuracy" 36 (36): 167-185, 1984

    9 Sundaram, S., "Technology Use on the Front Line: How Information Technology Enhances Individual Performance" 35 (35): 101-112, 2007

    10 Markus, M.L., "Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational change" 19 : 3-19, 2004

    1 Munro, M.C., "Understanding and Measuring User Competence" 33 : 45-57, 1997

    2 Deci, E.L., "The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior" 53 (53): 1024-1037, 1987

    3 Gecas, V. W. R. Scott, "The Social Psychology of Self-Efficacy" 15 : 291-316, 1989

    4 Saga, V.L., "The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology" 67-86, 1994

    5 Ritter, T., "The Impact of A Company’s Business Strategy on Its Technological Competence, Network Competence and Innovation Success" 57 : 548-556, 2004

    6 Speier, C., "The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies" 55 : 2002

    7 Fisher, C.D., "The Effects of Personal Control, Competence, and Extrinsic Reward Systems on Intrinsic Motivation" 21 : 273-288, 1978

    8 Stone, D.L., "The Effects of Feedback Consistency and Feedback Favorability on Self-Perceived Task Competence and Perceived Feedback Accuracy" 36 (36): 167-185, 1984

    9 Sundaram, S., "Technology Use on the Front Line: How Information Technology Enhances Individual Performance" 35 (35): 101-112, 2007

    10 Markus, M.L., "Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational change" 19 : 3-19, 2004

    11 Goodhue, D.L., "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance" 19 (19): 213-236, 1995

    12 Fornell, C., "Structural Equation Models With Unobservable variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

    13 Spreitzer, G.M., "Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment" 39 : 483-504, 1996

    14 Bandura, A., "Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory" Prentice Hall 1986

    15 Gist, M. E., "Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management" 12 (12): 472-485, 1987

    16 Deci, E.L., "Self-Determination in a Work Organization" 74 : 580-590, 1989

    17 Spreitzer, G.M., "Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation" 38 (38): 1442-1465, 1995

    18 Chen, Y.C., "Predicting College Student’ Use of E-Learning Systems: An Attempt to Extend Technology Acceptance Model" 2007

    19 Ahuja, M.K., "Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use" 29 (29): 427-459, 2005

    20 Zmud, R.W., "Measuring Technology Incorporation/Infusion" 9 : 148-155, 1992

    21 Bostrom, R.P., "MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective" 1 (1): 11-28, 1977

    22 Soh, M.S., "Investigating Information System Infusion from the Socio-Technical System Perspective" NUS 2008

    23 Deci, E.L., "Intrinsic motivation" Plenum Press 1975

    24 Tornatzky, L.G., "Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings" 29 (29): 28-45, 1982

    25 Cooper, R.B., "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technology Diffusion Approach" 36 (36): 123-139, 1990

    26 Thompson, R.L., "Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model" 11 (11): 167-187, 1994

    27 Blili, S., "Impact of Task Uncertainty, End-User Involvement and Competence on The Success of End-User Computing" 33 : 137-153, 1998

    28 Bandura, A., "Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory" 44 : 1175-1184, 1989

    29 Locke, E. A., "Goal Setting: A motivational Technique that Works!" Prentice Hall 1984

    30 Marquardt, D.W., "Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation" 12 : 591-612, 1970

    31 Jones, E., "Factors leading to Sales Force Automation Use: A Longitudinal Analysis" 22 (22): 145-156, 2002

    32 Hsieh, J., "Explaining Employees’ Extended Use of Complex Information Systems" 16 (16): 216-227, 2007

    33 Saeed, K.A., "Examining The Effects of Information Systems Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness on Post Adoption Stage of Information Systems" 45 (45): 376-386, 2008

    34 Adam, F., "ERP Projects: Good Or Bad For SMEs, in: Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness" Cambridge University Press 275-298, 2003

    35 Bandura, A., "Differential Engagement of Self Reactive Influences in Cognitive Motivation" 38 : 92-113, 1986

    36 Mason, C.H., "Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis" 28 : 268-280, 1991

    37 Thomas, K.W., "Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation" 15 : 666-681, 1990

    38 Wang, W., "Beyond Routine: Symbolic Adoption, Extended Use, and Emergent Use of Complex Information Systems in the Mandatory Organizational Context" 2006

    39 Marcolin, B.L., "Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement" 11 (11): 37-60, 2000

    40 Leavitt, H.J., "Applied Organisational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches, in: Handbook of Organisations, Vol. 27" Rand McNally 1144-1170, 1965

    41 Venkatesh, V., "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies" 46 (46): 186-204, 2000

    42 Amabile, T.M., "A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations" 10 : 123-167, 1988

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.19 1.19 1.28
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.31 1.21 1.379 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼