RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유아다문화교육정책 및 실제에 관한 비판적 담론분석: 정책, 교육청, 현장교사를 중심으로 = A critical discourse analysis of multicultural education policies and their local implementation in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99919804

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since the late 1990s, demographic diversity has increased in South Korea because of marriage-immigrants and migrant-workers, and this has engendered much discourse about multicultural education. Since late 2000, the Ministry of Education has pursued the development, implementation and evaluation of multicultural educational policies as a major task. However, the ensuing discourse has focused on having children with diverse linguistic backgrounds adapt to Korean language and customs, ignoring other goals of multicultural education. This might relate to how national institutions narrow the meaning of multicultural education by producing an ideology for it. To determine the national goals regarding multicultural education and the interpretation of the ideology inherent in them as it is transmitted by local agencies and interpreted by teachers, this critical discourse analysis examines the promoted values and hidden ideologies in various written and spoken texts and identifies the potential space between the ideology of policy and implementation. Findings demonstrate that, by selecting favorite words from Western multicultural education models or theories, policymakers framed early childhood multicultural education to assimilate ethnic minorities in Korea. National educational institutions functioned as the dominant form of controlling the notion of multicultural family and education. School inspectors were active disseminators of national ideologies within centralized and bureaucratic structures. Policies underwent transformations and met resistance by teachers interacting with local factors, including the top-down imposition of the new curriculum, their busy schedule, and their experiences with individual children. Teachers were neither assimilationists nor active multicultural educators. In light of these findings, it is recommended that policy makers consider experiences of teachers and voices of parents and children from culturally diverse backgrounds in developing multicultural education programs. Regarding the role and responsibility of local offices of education, a comprehensive effort to change the delivery system is strongly recommended. Creating professional learning communities to share diverse ideas with colleagues, parents, and professionals within, between, and across schools could be key to improving teachers` multicultural teaching competencies.
    번역하기

    Since the late 1990s, demographic diversity has increased in South Korea because of marriage-immigrants and migrant-workers, and this has engendered much discourse about multicultural education. Since late 2000, the Ministry of Education has pursued t...

    Since the late 1990s, demographic diversity has increased in South Korea because of marriage-immigrants and migrant-workers, and this has engendered much discourse about multicultural education. Since late 2000, the Ministry of Education has pursued the development, implementation and evaluation of multicultural educational policies as a major task. However, the ensuing discourse has focused on having children with diverse linguistic backgrounds adapt to Korean language and customs, ignoring other goals of multicultural education. This might relate to how national institutions narrow the meaning of multicultural education by producing an ideology for it. To determine the national goals regarding multicultural education and the interpretation of the ideology inherent in them as it is transmitted by local agencies and interpreted by teachers, this critical discourse analysis examines the promoted values and hidden ideologies in various written and spoken texts and identifies the potential space between the ideology of policy and implementation. Findings demonstrate that, by selecting favorite words from Western multicultural education models or theories, policymakers framed early childhood multicultural education to assimilate ethnic minorities in Korea. National educational institutions functioned as the dominant form of controlling the notion of multicultural family and education. School inspectors were active disseminators of national ideologies within centralized and bureaucratic structures. Policies underwent transformations and met resistance by teachers interacting with local factors, including the top-down imposition of the new curriculum, their busy schedule, and their experiences with individual children. Teachers were neither assimilationists nor active multicultural educators. In light of these findings, it is recommended that policy makers consider experiences of teachers and voices of parents and children from culturally diverse backgrounds in developing multicultural education programs. Regarding the role and responsibility of local offices of education, a comprehensive effort to change the delivery system is strongly recommended. Creating professional learning communities to share diverse ideas with colleagues, parents, and professionals within, between, and across schools could be key to improving teachers` multicultural teaching competencies.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유영의, "지속가능발전교육에 관한 한국의 교육정책 및 현 국가수준 교육과정의 분석" 한국영유아교원교육학회 17 (17): 319-341, 2013

    2 장명림, "육아지원기관에서의 다문화가정 영유아 지원방안" 육아정책연구소 2011

    3 김병만, "유아교육정책과 보육정책의 연구동향" 한국보육지원학회 8 (8): 5-31, 2012

    4 정경애, "유아교육정책 변화에 따른공립유치원교사의 교직생애에 대한 연구" 한국유아교육학회 33 (33): 169-195, 2013

    5 이일주, "유아교육재정정책" 141-162, 2013

    6 임양미, "유아교육비·보육비 산정연구 동향분석" 한국보육지원학회 9 (9): 75-106, 2013

    7 서문희, "유아교육 및 보육재정의 방향과 과제" 13-47, 2013

    8 문순홍, "생태학의 담론" 아르케 2006

    9 송기철, "다문화가정자녀교육의 한국어교육지원방안에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 53-76, 2013

    10 이정욱, "「5세 누리과정」 정책과 교육내용에 대한 유아교사의 인식" 한국영유아교원교육학회 16 (16): 167-192, 2012

    1 유영의, "지속가능발전교육에 관한 한국의 교육정책 및 현 국가수준 교육과정의 분석" 한국영유아교원교육학회 17 (17): 319-341, 2013

    2 장명림, "육아지원기관에서의 다문화가정 영유아 지원방안" 육아정책연구소 2011

    3 김병만, "유아교육정책과 보육정책의 연구동향" 한국보육지원학회 8 (8): 5-31, 2012

    4 정경애, "유아교육정책 변화에 따른공립유치원교사의 교직생애에 대한 연구" 한국유아교육학회 33 (33): 169-195, 2013

    5 이일주, "유아교육재정정책" 141-162, 2013

    6 임양미, "유아교육비·보육비 산정연구 동향분석" 한국보육지원학회 9 (9): 75-106, 2013

    7 서문희, "유아교육 및 보육재정의 방향과 과제" 13-47, 2013

    8 문순홍, "생태학의 담론" 아르케 2006

    9 송기철, "다문화가정자녀교육의 한국어교육지원방안에 관한 연구" 8 (8): 53-76, 2013

    10 이정욱, "「5세 누리과정」 정책과 교육내용에 대한 유아교사의 인식" 한국영유아교원교육학회 16 (16): 167-192, 2012

    11 Derman-Sparks, L., "What if all the kids are white? Anti-bias multicultural education with young children and families" Teachers College Press 2011

    12 Heller, M., "Voices of authority: Education and linguistic difference" Ablex 2001

    13 Ricento, T. K., "Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional" 30 (30): 401-427, 1996

    14 Bracey, G. W, "The first time ‘everything changed’: The 17th Bracey Report on the condition of public education" 89 (89): 119-136, 2007

    15 Fennimore, B., "Talk about children: Developing a living curriculum of advocacy and social justice, In Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing" Routledge 185-200, 2008

    16 Hornberger, N. H., "Slicing the onion ethnographically : Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice" 41 (41): 509-532, 2007

    17 Ramanathan, V., "Rethinking language planning and policy from the ground up: Refashioning institutional realities and human lives" 6 (6): 89-101, 2005

    18 Schmidt, R. Sr., "Political theory and language policy, In An introduction to language policy: Theory and method" Blackwell 95-110, 2006

    19 Baker, D. P., "National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling" Stanford University Press 2005

    20 Banks, J. A., "Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives" Wiley 2003

    21 Mitchell, B. M., "Multicultural education: An international guide to research, policies, and programs" Greenwood 1996

    22 Sleeter, C. E., "Multicultural education as social activism" State University of New York Press 1996

    23 Sleeter, C. E., "Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender" John Wiley & Sons 2007

    24 Stires, S., "Learning English in school: Rethinking curriculum, relationships, and time, In Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing" Routledge 49-66, 2008

    25 Blommaert, J., "Language policy and national identity, In An introduction to language policy: Theory and method" Blackwell 238-254, 2006

    26 Blommaert, J., "Language ideological debates" Mouton 1999

    27 Fairclough, N., "Language and power" Longman 1989

    28 Levinson, B. A. U., "Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy, In Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy" Ablex 1-22, 2001

    29 Hornberger, N. H., "Frameworks and models in language policy and planning, In An introduction to language policy: theory and method" Blackwell 24-41, 2006

    30 Kendall, E. F., "Diversity in the classroom: New approaches to the education of young children" Teachers College Press 1996

    31 Blommaert, J., "Discourse: A critical introduction" Cambridge University Press 2005

    32 Fairclough, N., "Discourse and social change" Polity Press 1992

    33 Fairclough, N., "Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language" Longman 1992

    34 Fairclough, N., "Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language" Longman 1995

    35 Lee, Y., "Critical discourse analysis of multicultural education policies and their local implementation in Korea" Columbia University 2013

    36 Valdés, P., "Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools: An ethnographic portrait" Teachers College Press 1996

    37 Souto-Manning, M., "Challenging the text and context of (Re)naming immigrant children: Children’s literature as tools for change, In Promoting social justice for young children" Springer 111-124, 2011

    38 García, O., "Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective" Cambridge University Press 2009

    39 Derman-Sparks, L., "Anti-bias curriculum: Tools for empowering young children"

    40 Banks, J. A., "An introduction to multicultural education" Allyn & Bacon 1999

    41 Sleeter, C. E., "After the school bell rings" Routledge 1996

    42 박은혜, "2011 국제표준교육분류 0단계(ISCED 0)에 기초한 누리과정의 유아교육제도로서의 의미" 한국영유아교원교육학회 16 (16): 341-356, 2012

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.72 2.72 2.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.74 2.67 3.087 0.56
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼