RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      서비스경제철학으로서의 한국고유사상 정합성연구 = A Study on Korean Traditional Philosophy as the Service Economy Philosophy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103702341

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The current research investigates the basic philosophy that would serve as a foundation for the development of the service economy. In particular, the current work suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy fits the philosophy of the service economy because of the relational nature of the Eastern culture (vs. Western culture). Therefore, it is suggested that trough manifestation of the Korean traditional philosophy, the service economy would be invigorated. The yin-yang and the Two Taegeuk do not emphasize the role of human, and thus, a new philosophy incorporating this aspect needs closer attention. Therefore, the Korean traditional philosophy, structured in a Three Taegeuk framework could serve as the foundation for the development of the service economy. The Three Taegeuk framework relates to the harmonization, horizontality, bi-directionality, and relational aspects of the service industries. For example, human serving the agent role in the society resembles the current service economy where service workers and customers serve important roles in value creation. Taken together, the current research suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy serve as an important foundation for the development of the service economy.
      번역하기

      The current research investigates the basic philosophy that would serve as a foundation for the development of the service economy. In particular, the current work suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy fits the philosophy of the service econ...

      The current research investigates the basic philosophy that would serve as a foundation for the development of the service economy. In particular, the current work suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy fits the philosophy of the service economy because of the relational nature of the Eastern culture (vs. Western culture). Therefore, it is suggested that trough manifestation of the Korean traditional philosophy, the service economy would be invigorated. The yin-yang and the Two Taegeuk do not emphasize the role of human, and thus, a new philosophy incorporating this aspect needs closer attention. Therefore, the Korean traditional philosophy, structured in a Three Taegeuk framework could serve as the foundation for the development of the service economy. The Three Taegeuk framework relates to the harmonization, horizontality, bi-directionality, and relational aspects of the service industries. For example, human serving the agent role in the society resembles the current service economy where service workers and customers serve important roles in value creation. Taken together, the current research suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy serve as an important foundation for the development of the service economy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김현수, "서비스연구의 프레임워크 제안" 서비스사이언스학회 5 (5): 199-216, 2015

      2 김현수, "서비스본질 기반의 서비스산업 정책방안" 서비스사이언스학회 7 (7): 15-26, 2017

      3 Lusch, R. F., "Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contribution from service-dominant logic" 47 (47): 5-14, 2008

      4 Lao-Tzu, "Tao Te Ching" Samsung Publishing Co 1982

      5 Lee, Keun Chul, "Research on Cheonbugyung Philosophy" 도서출판 모시는 사람들 2011

      6 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Audit Paradigm Shift by Economy and Business Change" 25 : 1-26, 2015

      7 The Service Korea Initiative, "A Vision Statement for Global Service Korea Initiative" The Service Korea Initiative 18-23, 2016

      8 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Transition Strategy from Traditional Economy to New Economy" The Society of Service Science 175-185, 2015

      9 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Study on Service R&D Policy" KISTEP 2017

      10 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Structural Change to Service-Centered Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution: U-Model Industry and Employment Structure" The Society of Service Science 43-54, 2016

      1 김현수, "서비스연구의 프레임워크 제안" 서비스사이언스학회 5 (5): 199-216, 2015

      2 김현수, "서비스본질 기반의 서비스산업 정책방안" 서비스사이언스학회 7 (7): 15-26, 2017

      3 Lusch, R. F., "Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contribution from service-dominant logic" 47 (47): 5-14, 2008

      4 Lao-Tzu, "Tao Te Ching" Samsung Publishing Co 1982

      5 Lee, Keun Chul, "Research on Cheonbugyung Philosophy" 도서출판 모시는 사람들 2011

      6 Kim, Hyunsoo, "Audit Paradigm Shift by Economy and Business Change" 25 : 1-26, 2015

      7 The Service Korea Initiative, "A Vision Statement for Global Service Korea Initiative" The Service Korea Initiative 18-23, 2016

      8 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Transition Strategy from Traditional Economy to New Economy" The Society of Service Science 175-185, 2015

      9 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Study on Service R&D Policy" KISTEP 2017

      10 Kim, Hyunsoo, "A Structural Change to Service-Centered Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution: U-Model Industry and Employment Structure" The Society of Service Science 43-54, 2016

      11 National Science & Technology Council, "A Strategy for Service R&D and Investment Plan" 2017

      12 The Korean Government, "A Strategy for Korean Service Economy" 2016

      13 김현수, "4차 산업혁명의 서비스경제화 촉진 연구" 서비스사이언스학회 6 (6): 15-27, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼