유럽의 개인정보보호법제와 감독체계 = A Study on Data Protection Laws and Supervisory Bodies in Europe

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

European Union. Germany, France and Britain set up each introduced permanent supervision organs, which are indeed responsible for the protectionof personal data and check this on their own. However, is noted that in the state, as in Germany, where applicable, the Federal Commissioner, who is to be chosen as legal guardians in the Federation, and the regulatory authorities, in each case apart responsible for public bodies and for private parties relevant countries are, at the same time are. The countries currently produced in particular the high level autonomy of the supervisory bodies is gewahrzuleisten. Because the objective of the protection of personal data can only be realized if the complete independence of the supervisory bodies is assured under least of personnel and organizational standpoint. Be established definitively by reference to foreign laws and supervisory bodies for the protection of personal data, the following points: first, the authority and responsibility of the supervisory bodies for theprotection of personal data must in particular be stronger and clearer ensured with legal support. Secondly, the high degree of independence of the supervisory bodies must be simultaneously secured. Third, the agent who possesses the professionalism of data protection, also the necessary powers to be granted. Fourthly, in the interior of the Board of Supervisors as well as the mood and accountability for the protection of personal data are to Betonnen. Fifthly, in a contract relationship with the protection of personal data requires the effort and strategy to strengthen the responsibility of the officer. In addition, the supervision and control of relevant institutions and authorities with regard must be more to the protection of personal data. Moreover, the participation of an institution or an association can positively join as third parties on the Board of Supervisors for personal data protection into consideration.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이민영, "해외 개인정보보호 집행체계 및 개인정보보호 주요 동향조사" 개인정보보호위원회 2012

2 개인정보보호법학회, "해외 개인정보보호 집행체계 및 개인정보보호 동향 조사" 개인정보보호위원회 2012

3 김재광, "영미법계 국가의 개인정보보호법제 동향 및 함의" 한국비교공법학회 6 (6): 109-153, 2005

4 김상찬, "빅데이터 시대의 온라인 마케팅과 개인정보 보호" 법과정책연구원 21 (21): 97-126, 2015

5 이인호, "개인정보감독기구 및 권리구제 방안에 관한 연구" 한국전산원 2004

6 OAIC, "Privacy Regulatory action policy"

7 Bureau of Consumer Protection, "Privacy & Data Security Update (2014)"

8 Adam Kardash, "Oser, Canada - Data Protection 2015"

9 함인선, "EU개인정보보호법제에 관한 연구 - ‘2012년 개인정보보호규칙안’을 중심으로 하여 -" 한국법학원 (133) : 5-38, 2012

10 고려대학교 산학협력단, "EU 및 일본의 개인정보보호 법제 및 감독체계 개편내용 분석" 2014

11 Jean Slemmons Stratford, "Data Protection and Privacy in the United States and Europe" 22 : 17-20, 1998

12 Lisa J Sotto, "Data Protection & Privacy(United States)" Hunton & Williams, Law Business Research 208-214, 2015

13 Peter Leonard, "Chater 2 : Australia, The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Data Protection 2015"

14 Nancy Holmes, "Canada's Federal Privacy Laws"

15 Christine Carron, "Canada amends federal data protection law, PIPEDA, Ddata Protection Report" nortonrosefulbright 2015

16 Federal CIO Council Privacy Commitee, "Best Practices: Elements of a Federal Privacy Program Version 1.0"

17 OAIC, "Annual Report 2013-14" 2014

18 "2015 International Compendium of Data Privacy Laws"

19 개인정보위원회, "2012 개인정보보호 연차보고서" 2012