RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털 리터러시 태도 평가 도구개발 및 타당화 연구 = A Study of Developing and Validatingan Assessment of Digital Literacy Attitudes

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Substantial progress has been made to describe the cognitive and social processes involved in digital literacy practices. However, few studies have examined non-cognitive factors that may significantly affect students` engagement in digital literacy practices. This article describes a research project for developing and validating a self-report instrument to assess children`s digital literacy attitudes as emotional and behavioral tendencies that influence and intervene their engaged (or disengaged) digital literacy practices. Informed by research in digital literacy and motivation for learning, we considered five factors that may account for multiple dimensions of the construct of digital literacy attitudes. These included (a) value (e.g., task, medium), (b) self-efficacy (e.g., ability, success), (c) emotion (e.g., feeling, preference), (d) participation (e.g., engagement, interaction), and (e) self-regulation (e.g., control, reflection). The digital literacy attitude assessment instrument was created, built upon the five-factor model, and multiple sets of items were revised and updated through pre-validation procedures including cognitive interviews and expert surveys. Finally, with the data collected from 1,609 third- and sixth-grade students in Korea, the result of confirmatory factor analyses indicated substantial internal consistency among 33 items in the final version of instrument designed to assess these five factors. Based upon the results, we discuss critical issues in conceptualizing and assessing children`s attitudes toward digital literacy practices and how the study`s results contribute to research and practice at a crucial time in schools where cognitive-only curricular and assessments are pervasive.
    번역하기

    Substantial progress has been made to describe the cognitive and social processes involved in digital literacy practices. However, few studies have examined non-cognitive factors that may significantly affect students` engagement in digital literacy p...

    Substantial progress has been made to describe the cognitive and social processes involved in digital literacy practices. However, few studies have examined non-cognitive factors that may significantly affect students` engagement in digital literacy practices. This article describes a research project for developing and validating a self-report instrument to assess children`s digital literacy attitudes as emotional and behavioral tendencies that influence and intervene their engaged (or disengaged) digital literacy practices. Informed by research in digital literacy and motivation for learning, we considered five factors that may account for multiple dimensions of the construct of digital literacy attitudes. These included (a) value (e.g., task, medium), (b) self-efficacy (e.g., ability, success), (c) emotion (e.g., feeling, preference), (d) participation (e.g., engagement, interaction), and (e) self-regulation (e.g., control, reflection). The digital literacy attitude assessment instrument was created, built upon the five-factor model, and multiple sets of items were revised and updated through pre-validation procedures including cognitive interviews and expert surveys. Finally, with the data collected from 1,609 third- and sixth-grade students in Korea, the result of confirmatory factor analyses indicated substantial internal consistency among 33 items in the final version of instrument designed to assess these five factors. Based upon the results, we discuss critical issues in conceptualizing and assessing children`s attitudes toward digital literacy practices and how the study`s results contribute to research and practice at a crucial time in schools where cognitive-only curricular and assessments are pervasive.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Erwin, P., "태도와 설득" 시그마프레스 2001

    2 차배근, "태도변용이론: 설득커뮤니케이션의 기본 원리" 나남 1992

    3 정현선, "초등학생의 매체 문식 활동에 관한 조사 연구" 한국독서학회 (33) : 127-170, 2014

    4 옥현진, "초등 고학년 학생들의 디지털 문식 활동에 대한 가치 인식과 참여 양상의 관계" 한국초등국어교육학회 (59) : 45-68, 2015

    5 정혜승, "읽기 태도의 개념과 성격" 한국독서학회 (16) : 381-403, 2006

    6 오은하, "인지 면담(Cognitive Interview)을 통 한국어 교과 설문 도구의 타당화 연구-초등학생 디지털 리터러시 태도 평가 문항 개선을 중심으로-" 청람어문교육학회 (56) : 131-172, 2015

    7 최숙기, "우리나라 청소년들의 읽기 태도 양상에 관한 연구 — 읽기 목적과 읽기 매체 변인을 중심으로 —" 국어교육학회 49 (49): 733-765, 2014

    8 임인재, "심리측정의 원리" 학연사 2003

    9 최숙기, "복합 양식 텍스트에 대한 독자의 읽기 행동 분석에 기반한 디지털 시대의 읽기 교육 방안 탐색" 한국독서학회 (29) : 224-264, 2013

    10 옥현진, "문식성 재개념화와 새로운 문식성 교수·학습을 위한 방향 탐색" 청람어문교육학회 (47) : 61-86, 2013

    1 Erwin, P., "태도와 설득" 시그마프레스 2001

    2 차배근, "태도변용이론: 설득커뮤니케이션의 기본 원리" 나남 1992

    3 정현선, "초등학생의 매체 문식 활동에 관한 조사 연구" 한국독서학회 (33) : 127-170, 2014

    4 옥현진, "초등 고학년 학생들의 디지털 문식 활동에 대한 가치 인식과 참여 양상의 관계" 한국초등국어교육학회 (59) : 45-68, 2015

    5 정혜승, "읽기 태도의 개념과 성격" 한국독서학회 (16) : 381-403, 2006

    6 오은하, "인지 면담(Cognitive Interview)을 통 한국어 교과 설문 도구의 타당화 연구-초등학생 디지털 리터러시 태도 평가 문항 개선을 중심으로-" 청람어문교육학회 (56) : 131-172, 2015

    7 최숙기, "우리나라 청소년들의 읽기 태도 양상에 관한 연구 — 읽기 목적과 읽기 매체 변인을 중심으로 —" 국어교육학회 49 (49): 733-765, 2014

    8 임인재, "심리측정의 원리" 학연사 2003

    9 최숙기, "복합 양식 텍스트에 대한 독자의 읽기 행동 분석에 기반한 디지털 시대의 읽기 교육 방안 탐색" 한국독서학회 (29) : 224-264, 2013

    10 옥현진, "문식성 재개념화와 새로운 문식성 교수·학습을 위한 방향 탐색" 청람어문교육학회 (47) : 61-86, 2013

    11 서수현, "디지털 문식성 교육을 위한 학습자 프로파일 구성 요소 탐색" 청람어문교육학회 (52) : 87-114, 2014

    12 김지연, "디지털 리터러시의 정의적 영역 평가 도구 개발 방향에 대한 탐색적 연구" 국어교육학회 50 (50): 205-230, 2015

    13 정현선, "디지털 리터러시의 국어교육적 고찰" 국어교육학회 (21) : 5-42, 2004

    14 김종윤, "디지털 리터러시 태도의 개념에 대한 이론적 탐색" 한국어교육학회 (150) : 263-294, 2015

    15 이순영, "독서 동기와 몰입 독서의 영향에 관한 비판적 고찰" 국어교육학회 (26) : 403-425, 2006

    16 정혜승, "국어과 디지털 교과서 모형 개발" 한국교육과정학회 30 (30): 155-178, 2012

    17 Johnson, G. M., "Young children’s Internet use at home and school: Patterns and profiles" 8 (8): 282-293, 2010

    18 Henson, R. K., "Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice" 66 (66): 393-416, 2006

    19 Leu, D. Jr., "Theoretical models and processes of reading" International Reading Association 1568-1611, 2004

    20 Carrington, V., "The uncanny, digital texts and literacy" 19 (19): 467-482, 2005

    21 Rokeach, M., "The nature of human values" Free press 1973

    22 Hidi, S., "The four-phase model of interest development" 41 (41): 111-127, 2006

    23 Memon, A., "The cognitive interview: its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications" 1 : 291-307, 1991

    24 Henk, W. A., "The Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS)-A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers" 48 (48): 470-482, 1995

    25 Heathington, B. S., "The Development of Scales to Measure Attitudes toward Reading" The University of Tennessee 1975

    26 Hooper, D., "Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit" 6 : 53-60, 2008

    27 Newcomb, T. M., "Social psychology; a study of human interaction" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1965

    28 Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory" Prentice Hall 1986

    29 Joo, Y. J., "Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction" 48 (48): 5-17, 2000

    30 Jackson, D. L., "Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations" 14 (14): 6-23, 2009

    31 Spangler, K. L., "Reading interests vs. reading preferences: using the research" 36 : 876-878, 1983

    32 Terwee, C. B., "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires" 60 (60): 34-42, 2007

    33 Collins, D., "Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods" 12 : 229-238, 2003

    34 Senko, C., "Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation" 38 (38): 603-610, 2002

    35 Bergin, D. A., "Patterns of motivation and social behavior associated with microcomputer use of young children" 85 : 437-445, 1993

    36 Mullis, I. V., "PIRLS 2011 Assessment framework" International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement 2009

    37 Hidi, S., "Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 89-115, 2004

    38 Schunk, D. H., "Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications" Pearson 2008

    39 Ball, S., "Motivation in Education" Academic Press 1977

    40 Conradi, K., "Motivation Terminology in Reading Research: A Conceptual Review" 26 (26): 127-164, 2014

    41 Buckingham, D., "Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture" Polity Press 2003

    42 McKenna, M. C., "Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers" 43 (43): 626-639, 1990

    43 Eastin, M. S., "Internet Self-efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide" 6 (6): 2000

    44 Tsai, M. J., "Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy" 40 (40): 43-50, 2003

    45 Allport, G. W., "Handbook of social psychology" Clark University Press 798-844, 1935

    46 Zimmerman, B. J., "Handbook of self-regulation" Academic Press 13-39, 2000

    47 Fabos, B., "Handbook of research on new literacies" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 839-870, 2008

    48 Black, R. W., "Handbook of adolescent literacy research" Guilford Press 271-286, 2009

    49 Coiro, J., "Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet" 42 (42): 214-257, 2007

    50 Putman, S. M., "Exploring Dispositions Toward Online Reading: Analyzing the Survey of Online Reading Attitudes and Behaviors" 35 (35): 1-31, 2014

    51 Baker, L., "Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement" 34 (34): 452-477, 1999

    52 Schiefele, U., "Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence" 47 (47): 427-463, 2012

    53 Digital Literacy Standards British Columbia Department of Education, "Digital literacy standards"

    54 Chapman, J. W., "Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging sub-components and their relationship with reading achievement" 87 (87): 154-167, 1995

    55 Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 (6): 1-55, 1999

    56 Jenkins, H., "Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century" MacArthur Foundation 2006

    57 Durndell, A., "Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample" 18 (18): 521-535, 2002

    58 Neitzel, C., "Children’s early interest-based activities in the home and subsequent information contributions and pursuits in Kindergarten" 100 (100): 782-797, 2008

    59 Schunk, D. H., "Big theories revisited" Information Age 115-138, 2004

    60 Sainsbury, M., "Attitudes to reading at ages nine and eleven" 27 (27): 373-386, 2004

    61 Alexander, J. E., "Attitudes and reading" IRA 1976

    62 New London Group, "A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social features" 66 (66): 60-92, 1996

    63 Murphy, P. K., "A motivated exploration of motivation terminology" 25 : 3-53, 2000

    64 Wallbrown, F. H., "A factor analysis of reading attitudes along with measures of reading achievement and scholastic aptitude" 15 (15): 160-165, 1978

    65 NAEP, "2015 Writing Student Questionnaire, Computer-based Assessment: Grade 8"

    66 NAEP, "2015 Reading Student Questionnaire: Grade 4, 8, 12"

    67 OECD, "2012 PISA Student Questionnaire Form"

    68 OECD, "2009 PISA Results: Student Online"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-02-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Language Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.01 1.01 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.92 0.96 1.335 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼