RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    2015 개정 중학교 사회과교육과정개발 과정의 의사결정 구조에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Review on the Decision Making Structure of the 2015 Revised National Middle School Social Studies Curriculum Development

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper provides a critical review on the decision making structure of the 2015 national middle school social studies curriculum development. It illustrates how the Ministry of Education and the standardized curriculum making system damaged the specialty of the qualified persons in charge as before and points out the authoritarian decision making process especially found in the 2015 process. It finds that the excessive role of the Ministry of Education and the standardized curriculum making system put constraints on the discretion of the qualified persons with specialty. Also, monopolized decision making structure dominated by specific group of persons sharing their interests has generated unnecessary inter-group conflicts by limiting the democratic deliberation process. If the monopolized decision making becomes a perpetual problem in the future, participants representing geography education should put more efforts on changing the decision making structure into a more democratic, open, and fair one instead on simply accepting the top-down decisions.
    번역하기

    This paper provides a critical review on the decision making structure of the 2015 national middle school social studies curriculum development. It illustrates how the Ministry of Education and the standardized curriculum making system damaged the spe...

    This paper provides a critical review on the decision making structure of the 2015 national middle school social studies curriculum development. It illustrates how the Ministry of Education and the standardized curriculum making system damaged the specialty of the qualified persons in charge as before and points out the authoritarian decision making process especially found in the 2015 process. It finds that the excessive role of the Ministry of Education and the standardized curriculum making system put constraints on the discretion of the qualified persons with specialty. Also, monopolized decision making structure dominated by specific group of persons sharing their interests has generated unnecessary inter-group conflicts by limiting the democratic deliberation process. If the monopolized decision making becomes a perpetual problem in the future, participants representing geography education should put more efforts on changing the decision making structure into a more democratic, open, and fair one instead on simply accepting the top-down decisions.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼