한국판 단축 공감척도의 타당화

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 한국의 간호대학생을 대상으로 단축형 공감척도의 심리측정 속성을 분석하여 한국판으로 타당화하는 것이다. 총 528명의 간호대학생(여학생 494, 남학생 34)을 대상으로 요인분석, 신뢰도 분석 및 상관분석 이 이루어졌다. 연구1(N=298)에서 탐색적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 전체 22문항 중 11문항 단일요인 구조가 확인되 었다. 내적 신뢰도는 .88로 다소 높았으며 대인간 반응척도(IRI)와의 상관관계 분석을 통해(r=.279, p<.000) 한국판 단 축 공감척도(EQ-Short-K)의 준거 타당도를 확인하였다. 연구2(N=230)에서 총 11문항의 한국판 단축 공감척도와 대인 관계 유능성 척도(ICQ)의 상관분석결과 통계적으로 유의한 상관이 제시되었다(r=.351, p<.000). 본 연구결과는 한국판 단축 공감척도의 내적 신뢰도와 타당도를 확인하고 이를 토대로 한국의 간호 영역에서 의미있게 활용될 수 있는 공 감 측정 도구로서의 타당성과 유용성을 제시하였다는 데 의의가 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this study was to validate the Korean Version of the Empathy Quotient-Short form(EQ-Short-K) in a sample of Korean nursing students. A total 528 students(494 female, 34 male) were studied by 2 groups. To provide a validity of the Empathy Quotient-Short form in Korean sample, exploratory factor analysis, reliability test and Pearson correlation coefficient were conducted. In study 1 (N=298), the finding of factor analysis confirmed that 11 of the 22 EQ-Short items were presented as a single-factor structure. The reliability estimate of the EQ-Short-K was high(.88). In terms of criterion validity, the EQ-short-K correlated positively with Interpersonal Reactivity Index(IRI)(r=.279, p<.000). In study 2 (N=230), the finding identified that the EQ-Short-K correlated positively with Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire(ICQ)(r=.351, p<.000). It suggested that the EQ-Short-K had satisfactory internal consistency and validity, thereby the EQ-Short-K can be used as a meaningful measure for empathy among Korean nursing domain.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한나리, "한국 대학생의 대인관계 유능성 척도 타당화 연구" 한국상담심리학회 22 (22): 137-156, 2010

2 허재홍, "공감지수(EQ) 척도의 심리측정 속성" 인문과학연구소 183 (183): 183-200, 2010

3 V. Price, "What's it all about, empathy?" 17 (17): 106-110, 1997

4 R. Guan, "Validation of the empathy quotient-short form among Chinese healthcare professionals" 40 (40): 75-84, 2012

5 Y. J. Lee, "Understanding of Factor analysis" Sukjung 438-, 2002

6 S. Baron-Cohen, "The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences" 34 (34): 163-175, 2004

7 M. Hojat, "The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Development and preliminary psychometric data" 61 (61): 349-365, 2001

8 A. Preti, "The Empathy Quotient: A cross-cultural comparison of the Italian version" 16 (16): 50-70, 2010

9 A. C. Samson, "Short German versions of empathizing and systemizing self-assessment scales" 69 (69): 239-244, 2010

10 C. Allison, "Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ)" 51 (51): 829-835, 2011

11 W. Reynolds, "Nursing, empathy and perception of the moral" 32 (32): 235-242, 2000

12 E. J. Lawrence, "Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient" 34 (34): 911-920, 2004

13 D. Buhrmester, "Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships" 55 : 991-1008, 1988

14 J. Yu, "Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: systematic review" 65 (65): 1790-1806, 2009

15 J. Williams, "Empathy and nurse education" 30 (30): 752-755, 2010

16 S. H. Park, "Empathy and empathic understanding" Wonmisa 220-, 1994

17 A. Wakabayashi, "Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short)" 41 (41): 929-940, 2006

18 R. Hogan, "Development of an empathy scale" 33 (33): 307-316, 1969

19 S. Berthoz, "Cross-cultural validation of the Empathy Quotient in a French-speaking sample" 53 (53): 469-477, 2008

20 E. L. La Monica, "Construct validity of an empathy instrument" 4 (4): 389-400, 1981

21 M. H. Davis, "A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy" 10 : 85-, 1980

22 A. Mehrabian, "A measure of emotional empathy" 40 (40): 525-543, 1972