RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독일의 테러방지법과 테러대응기구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103066075

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the past, Germany responded to terrorism by laws and regulations relating to criminal matters or procedures and intelligence service or investigative powers. But after the formidable 9/11 terrorist incident, German government has aimed at perfection in coping with terrorist activities through enacting a series of new special laws, including Terrorismus-bekämpfungsgesetz(2002), Terrorismusbekämpfungs-ergänzungs gesetz(2007) etc. In particular, it has been making every effort for the prevention and/or suppression of terrorist offences by monitoring terrorism-related movements, positive exercise of investigative authority, tightening security check in exit and entry, tracing terrorist fund and strengthening punishment of terrorists. Besides, it established the Gemeinsames Terrorismusabwehrzentrum which is a cooperative institution for counter-terrorism in 2004. This organization has served not only as a terroristic intelligence integrating center but also as an effective governmental anti-terrorism network. Now German case is estimated as a good and advanced model. On the other hand, decision on “partial unconstitutionality” of the Federal Criminal Police Office(Bundeskriminalam) Act delivered by German Federal Constitutional Court in April 2016 has great implications for us in regard to limitation of investigative agency s power to prevent terrorism or minimization of human rights violation.
    번역하기

    In the past, Germany responded to terrorism by laws and regulations relating to criminal matters or procedures and intelligence service or investigative powers. But after the formidable 9/11 terrorist incident, German government has aimed at perfectio...

    In the past, Germany responded to terrorism by laws and regulations relating to criminal matters or procedures and intelligence service or investigative powers. But after the formidable 9/11 terrorist incident, German government has aimed at perfection in coping with terrorist activities through enacting a series of new special laws, including Terrorismus-bekämpfungsgesetz(2002), Terrorismusbekämpfungs-ergänzungs gesetz(2007) etc. In particular, it has been making every effort for the prevention and/or suppression of terrorist offences by monitoring terrorism-related movements, positive exercise of investigative authority, tightening security check in exit and entry, tracing terrorist fund and strengthening punishment of terrorists. Besides, it established the Gemeinsames Terrorismusabwehrzentrum which is a cooperative institution for counter-terrorism in 2004. This organization has served not only as a terroristic intelligence integrating center but also as an effective governmental anti-terrorism network. Now German case is estimated as a good and advanced model. On the other hand, decision on “partial unconstitutionality” of the Federal Criminal Police Office(Bundeskriminalam) Act delivered by German Federal Constitutional Court in April 2016 has great implications for us in regard to limitation of investigative agency s power to prevent terrorism or minimization of human rights violation.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼