스포츠심리학 : 육상 코치의 리더십 행동유형과 선수만족과의 관계 = The Relationship between Track & Field Coach’s Leadership Behavior Type and Member Satisfaction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze how track & field member’s understanding of the subordinate factors of the track & field coach’s leadership behavior type would relationship the member satisfaction. For this study, the track & field members registered at the Korea Athletics Federation in 2005 have been chosen as a population to be sampled using the Stratified Random Sampling. A total of 348 members(male 234, female 114) answered the questionnaires and 320 complete answers (male 214, female 106) excluding some with problems have been taken for the final data analysis.

The results show as follows;

1) ‘Training and direction behavior’ and ‘affirmative compensation behavior’, the subordinate factors of the track & field coach’s leadership behavior types, relationship ‘task accomplishment satisfaction’, the subordinate factor of member satisfaction. 2) ‘Affirmative compensation behavior’, the subordinate factor of the track & field coach’s leadership behavior type relationship ‘social reciprocity satisfaction’, the subordinate factor of member satisfaction. 3) ‘Training and direction behavior’ , ‘democratic behavior’, and ‘social support behavior’, the subordinate factors of the track & field coach’s leadership behavior type relationship ‘coach behavior satisfaction’, the subordinate factor of member satisfaction.

4) Generally evaluation level of every subordinate factors with ‘female members’ was higher than that of ‘male members.’ 5) Among the subordinate factors of the track & field(sprint, jumping, throwing, and long distance) coach’s leadership behavior type, the evaluation levels of ‘absolute behavior’ had the biggest relationships(Sheffe’s post-hoc test result, ‘sprint with long endurance’ relationship). 6) Among the track & field coach’s leadership behavior type and the subordinate factors of member satisfaction according to ‘member’s career’, the evaluation level of ‘absolute behavior’ had the biggest relationship with members career ‘less than 3 years(Sheffe’s post-hoc test result, ‘less than 3year with less than 1year’, ‘less than 3year with less than 5year’, ‘less than 3year with less than 7year’ relationship).’

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "코칭론 1급 경기지도자 연구교재(전공II)" 1990

2 "코치행동에 대한 선호인식의 일치 정 도와 성원만족 및 응집성의 관계" 서울대학교 1997

3 "코치의 리더십 행동의 선호형과 현실형 간의 불일치와 성취동기 선수만족과의 관계" 부산대학교 대학원 1994

4 "코치의 리더십 행동유형과 집단응집력의 관계" 단국대학교 대학원 1999

5 "스포츠와 사회환경" 무지개사 2001

6 "스포츠 집단의 지도력 측정도구 개발" 한국체육과학연구원 1990

7 "Twenty years of consideration and structure Current Development in the study of leadership" South Illinois University Press 1973

8 "The social psychology of organizations" 1978

9 "The influence of leader behaviors and stitutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball team Journal of Sport Psychology" 332-346, 1986

10 "Sociology of sport Monograph Series Canadian Association for Health" 1978

11 "Readings in sport psychology" 1972

12 "Problem athletes and how to handle them" 1966

13 "Preferred leadership in sports Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science 3" 85-92, 1978

14 "Predicting cohesion in coaching team" 22 : 548-557, 1991

15 "Leadership in competitive and recreational sport University of Western Ontario" Unpublished master's thesis 1981

16 "Leadership and satisfaction in athletics" 17 : 276-293, 1995

17 "Discrepancy Between preference behavior in sports Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences" 85-92, 1984

18 "Dimensions of leader behavior in sports Development of leadership scale Journal of Sports Psychology" 34-45, 1980