RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    성소수자에 대한 혐오표현, 그 옹호의 논리를 넘어서: 표현의 자유론 비판과 시민권의 재구성 = Should Anti-gay Hate Speech Be Outlawed? Critiquing Free Speech Argument and Constructing Sexual Citizenship

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As coming out of sexual minorities and social discussion about sexual minorities became more prevalent, hate expression has also become more common. The problem is that a frame of ``anti-discrimination versus freedom of expression`` has been built as hate expression em. emerged as a social issue. Freedom of expression has been neutrally argved as the principle to keep a free market of ideas, but on the other hand it has been a main supportive ground for not prohibiting hate expression. However, if unequal power relations faced by sexual minorities in reality are recognized, hate expression does not exist as a ``pure`` expression in a free market of ideas. That is the reason why the question of ``whose``, ``about whom``, and ``what`` expression should be protected is to be discussed, sinec freedom of expression is more than a superficial concept. When the unequal power relations existing in a society is realized, minorities perceived as ``abnormal`` should be protected from the group who considers themselves ``normal`` and to be of ``common sense.`` However, promoting only legal ``restriction`` has a risk of intensifying social conflict. Therefore, the way to activate expression of and communication with ``the abnormal`` should be promoted, not the way to control ``normals`` However, the objective of ``abnormal`` minorities should not be joining a member of existing ``normal`` majorities. Sexual minorities should be recognized as a ``citizen`` of a society, not as one of heterosexual ``normal`` members. Now, citizenship which considers people to be same colorless citizens needs to be reformed to ``sexual citizenship`` with ``sexual identity`` and ``sexual orientation.`` Hate expression blocks not only sexual minorities to become citizens, but also everyone by denying ``sexuality.`` Negative function of hate expression in a society with power relations by normality and universality should be reconsidered.
    번역하기

    As coming out of sexual minorities and social discussion about sexual minorities became more prevalent, hate expression has also become more common. The problem is that a frame of ``anti-discrimination versus freedom of expression`` has been built as ...

    As coming out of sexual minorities and social discussion about sexual minorities became more prevalent, hate expression has also become more common. The problem is that a frame of ``anti-discrimination versus freedom of expression`` has been built as hate expression em. emerged as a social issue. Freedom of expression has been neutrally argved as the principle to keep a free market of ideas, but on the other hand it has been a main supportive ground for not prohibiting hate expression. However, if unequal power relations faced by sexual minorities in reality are recognized, hate expression does not exist as a ``pure`` expression in a free market of ideas. That is the reason why the question of ``whose``, ``about whom``, and ``what`` expression should be protected is to be discussed, sinec freedom of expression is more than a superficial concept. When the unequal power relations existing in a society is realized, minorities perceived as ``abnormal`` should be protected from the group who considers themselves ``normal`` and to be of ``common sense.`` However, promoting only legal ``restriction`` has a risk of intensifying social conflict. Therefore, the way to activate expression of and communication with ``the abnormal`` should be promoted, not the way to control ``normals`` However, the objective of ``abnormal`` minorities should not be joining a member of existing ``normal`` majorities. Sexual minorities should be recognized as a ``citizen`` of a society, not as one of heterosexual ``normal`` members. Now, citizenship which considers people to be same colorless citizens needs to be reformed to ``sexual citizenship`` with ``sexual identity`` and ``sexual orientation.`` Hate expression blocks not only sexual minorities to become citizens, but also everyone by denying ``sexuality.`` Negative function of hate expression in a society with power relations by normality and universality should be reconsidered.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼