RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    구인 타당도와 결과 타당도 이론이 독서 평가의 해석과 사용에 주는 함의 = Implications of Theory of Construct Validity and Consequential Validity for Interpreting and Using Reading Assessment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102063203

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While a primary goal of any assessment of reading is to help students’ reading development, current assessments fail to achieve this goal and have a negative impact on classroom practices. This conceptual paper introduces the concepts of “construct validity” and “social consequences” which should be considered in assessment validation. Within the framework informed by these validity theories, I critically reflect on the culture and practice of reading assessment and suggest critical approaches to understanding and enhancing the validity of reading assessment. I synthesize research literature related to assessment validity in both educational measurement and reading,and offer theoretical accounts of what the valid assessment of reading looks like and how to validate interpreting and using the assessment of reading. The synthesis of literatures allows a reconceptualization of the validity of reading assessment as a broader term that connotes the process of validating the interpretation and use of assessment results. Implications derived from rethinking validity are discussed, followed by possible considerations for better practices in reading assessment.
    번역하기

    While a primary goal of any assessment of reading is to help students’ reading development, current assessments fail to achieve this goal and have a negative impact on classroom practices. This conceptual paper introduces the concepts of “construc...

    While a primary goal of any assessment of reading is to help students’ reading development, current assessments fail to achieve this goal and have a negative impact on classroom practices. This conceptual paper introduces the concepts of “construct validity” and “social consequences” which should be considered in assessment validation. Within the framework informed by these validity theories, I critically reflect on the culture and practice of reading assessment and suggest critical approaches to understanding and enhancing the validity of reading assessment. I synthesize research literature related to assessment validity in both educational measurement and reading,and offer theoretical accounts of what the valid assessment of reading looks like and how to validate interpreting and using the assessment of reading. The synthesis of literatures allows a reconceptualization of the validity of reading assessment as a broader term that connotes the process of validating the interpretation and use of assessment results. Implications derived from rethinking validity are discussed, followed by possible considerations for better practices in reading assessment.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김환식, "한국의 학교 책무성 정책의 현황과 과제" 한국교육개발원/재미한인교육연구자협회 41-69, 2010

    2 이재경, "미국의 학교 책무성 정책의 설계와 평가" 한국교육개발원/재미한인교육연구자협회 75-101, 2010

    3 임천택, "독서 평가의 이론적 배경과 접근 방법" 한국어문교육학회 22 : 427-463, 2000

    4 노명완, "국어 시험의 현황과 개선 방안" 국어교육학회 (20) : 5-30, 2004

    5 김수동, "국어 수업에서 학생 평가를 잘 하려면" 한국교육과정평가원 2005

    6 Wiliam, D., "What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment" 34 : 254-284, 2010

    7 Messick, S., "Validity, In Educational measurement(3rd ed.)" Collier Macmillan 13-103, 1989

    8 Moss, P. A., "Validity in Educational Assessment" 30 : 109-162, 2006

    9 Mislevy, R. J., "Validity as design" 36 : 463-469, 2007

    10 Kane, M. T., "Validation, In Educational measurement(4th ed.)" American Council on Education/Praeger 17-64, 2006

    1 김환식, "한국의 학교 책무성 정책의 현황과 과제" 한국교육개발원/재미한인교육연구자협회 41-69, 2010

    2 이재경, "미국의 학교 책무성 정책의 설계와 평가" 한국교육개발원/재미한인교육연구자협회 75-101, 2010

    3 임천택, "독서 평가의 이론적 배경과 접근 방법" 한국어문교육학회 22 : 427-463, 2000

    4 노명완, "국어 시험의 현황과 개선 방안" 국어교육학회 (20) : 5-30, 2004

    5 김수동, "국어 수업에서 학생 평가를 잘 하려면" 한국교육과정평가원 2005

    6 Wiliam, D., "What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment" 34 : 254-284, 2010

    7 Messick, S., "Validity, In Educational measurement(3rd ed.)" Collier Macmillan 13-103, 1989

    8 Moss, P. A., "Validity in Educational Assessment" 30 : 109-162, 2006

    9 Mislevy, R. J., "Validity as design" 36 : 463-469, 2007

    10 Kane, M. T., "Validation, In Educational measurement(4th ed.)" American Council on Education/Praeger 17-64, 2006

    11 Afflerbach, P., "Understanding and using reading assessment: K-12" International Reading Association 2007

    12 Frederiksen, N., "The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning" 39 : 193-202, 1984

    13 Davis, A., "The limits of educational assessment" Blackwell Publishers 1998

    14 Moss, P. A., "The idea of testing: Psychometric and sociocultural perspectives" 3 : 63-83, 2005

    15 Shepard, L. A., "The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity" 16 : 5-24, 1997

    16 Shepard, L., "Standards, assessments, and accountability" National Academy of Education 2009

    17 American Psychological Association, "Standards for educational and psychological testsand manuals" Author 1966

    18 Gipps, C., "Socio-cultural aspects of assessment" 24 : 355-392, 1999

    19 Brown, J. S., "Situated cognition and the culture of learning" 18 : 32-42, 1989

    20 Moss, P. A., "Reconstructing validity" 36 : 470-476, 2007

    21 Gee, J. P., "Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective" 44 : 714-725, 2001

    22 Moss, P. A., "Portfolio, accountability, and an interpretive approach to validity" 11 : 12-21, 1992

    23 Sireci, S. G., "On validity and test validation" 36 : 477-481, 2007

    24 Mislevy, R. J., "On the structure of educational assessments" 1 : 3-62, 2004

    25 Messick, S., "Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment" 18 : 5-11, 1989

    26 Pellegrino, J. W., "Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment" National Academy Press 2001

    27 Torrance, H., "Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning, and assessment in the classroom" Open University Press 1998

    28 Bransford, J. D., "How people learn: Brain, mind,experience, and school" National Academy Press 2000

    29 Heubert, J. P., "High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation" National Academy Press 1999

    30 Afflerbach, P., "High stakes testing and reading assessment" 2005

    31 Johnston, P., "Constructive evaluation and the improvement of teaching and learning" 90 : 509-528, 1989

    32 Cronbach, L. J., "Construct validity in psychological tests" 52 : 281-302, 1955

    33 Linn, R. L., "Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria" 20 : 15-21, 1991

    34 Afflerbach, P., "Classroom assessment of literacy, In Handbook of reading research Vol. 4" Routledge 487-514, 2010

    35 Gipps, C., "Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment" Falmer 1994

    36 Broadfoot, P., "Assessment, schools, and society: Contemporary sociology of the school" Methuen 1979

    37 American Educational Research Association, "American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for educational and psychological testing" American Educational Research Association 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.18 1.18 1.509 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼