RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Pine과 Gilmore의 체험영역 모델에 관한 검증 :한산모시축제 체험활동 참가자 만족을 중심으로 = Verification on Experience Realms of Pine and Gilmore: The Case of Participants’ Satisfaction of Experiential Activities at Hansan Ramie Festival

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105019657

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Earlier, Pine and Gilmore developed the model of experience realms: ‘entertainment’, The richest experience encompasses aspects of all four realms, ‘sweet spot’. This article examines the existence of experience realms and ‘sweet spot’ in Korea Festival. To analyze the relationship between such experience realms and participants’ satisfaction on site, a field experiment was conducted at Hansan Ramie Festival in Korea using Pine- Gilmore’s model. Using ANOVA and multi-regression analysis, authors, contrary to Pine - Gilmore’s thesis, found out that (1) there were no realms of ‘escape’ and ‘sweet spot’ at Ramie Festival, that (2) the realm of ‘entertainment’, which provided the participants with the richest satisfaction in all four experiential activities, was observed to be an omnipresent realm of an experience, and that (3) the program in which visitors participated with low involvement was not recognized as an experiential activity.
    번역하기

    Earlier, Pine and Gilmore developed the model of experience realms: ‘entertainment’, The richest experience encompasses aspects of all four realms, ‘sweet spot’. This article examines the existence of experience realms and ‘sweet spot’ in ...

    Earlier, Pine and Gilmore developed the model of experience realms: ‘entertainment’, The richest experience encompasses aspects of all four realms, ‘sweet spot’. This article examines the existence of experience realms and ‘sweet spot’ in Korea Festival. To analyze the relationship between such experience realms and participants’ satisfaction on site, a field experiment was conducted at Hansan Ramie Festival in Korea using Pine- Gilmore’s model. Using ANOVA and multi-regression analysis, authors, contrary to Pine - Gilmore’s thesis, found out that (1) there were no realms of ‘escape’ and ‘sweet spot’ at Ramie Festival, that (2) the realm of ‘entertainment’, which provided the participants with the richest satisfaction in all four experiential activities, was observed to be an omnipresent realm of an experience, and that (3) the program in which visitors participated with low involvement was not recognized as an experiential activity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 원융희, "한국전통문화의 체험관광 상품화 방안에 관한 연구" 16 : 51-63, 2003

    2 Schumitt B H, "체험마케팅 Experiential Marketing How to Get Consumers to Sense Relate to Your Company and Brands" 세종 서적 2002

    3 이광희, "체험관광상품 활성화 방안" 1999

    4 Kerlinger F, "사회행동과학 연구방법의 기초" 성원사 1988

    5 김창수, "민속공동체신앙이 체화 된 이벤트 축제 상품 개발 방안" 5 (5): 1999

    6 고동우, "기획축제 참가자의 여가경험 내재적 동기론을 중심으로" 1 (1): 187-203, 2000

    7 고동우, "관광후 평가 개념의 경험적 구분" 22 (22): 309-316, 1998b

    8 고동우, "관광의 심리적 체험과 만족감의 관계" 1998a

    9 Pine, "Welcome to the experience economy" 97-105, 1998

    10 Vitterso J, "Tourist experiences and attractions" 27 (27): 432-450, 2000

    1 원융희, "한국전통문화의 체험관광 상품화 방안에 관한 연구" 16 : 51-63, 2003

    2 Schumitt B H, "체험마케팅 Experiential Marketing How to Get Consumers to Sense Relate to Your Company and Brands" 세종 서적 2002

    3 이광희, "체험관광상품 활성화 방안" 1999

    4 Kerlinger F, "사회행동과학 연구방법의 기초" 성원사 1988

    5 김창수, "민속공동체신앙이 체화 된 이벤트 축제 상품 개발 방안" 5 (5): 1999

    6 고동우, "기획축제 참가자의 여가경험 내재적 동기론을 중심으로" 1 (1): 187-203, 2000

    7 고동우, "관광후 평가 개념의 경험적 구분" 22 (22): 309-316, 1998b

    8 고동우, "관광의 심리적 체험과 만족감의 관계" 1998a

    9 Pine, "Welcome to the experience economy" 97-105, 1998

    10 Vitterso J, "Tourist experiences and attractions" 27 (27): 432-450, 2000

    11 Wang, "Tourism and Modernity A Sociological Analysis" Pergamon Press 2000

    12 Henning, "The Tourist as a Metaphor of the Social World" CABI Publishing 169-187, 2002

    13 Pearce, "The Social Psychology of Tourist Behavior" Pergamon Press 1982

    14 _, "The Experience Economy^Work is Theatre^Every Business a Stage" HBS Press 1999

    15 the sacred journey, "The Anthropology of Tourism University of Pennsylvania Press" 21-36, 1989

    16 "Satisfaction sacrifice surprise" 20 (20): 18-23, 2000

    17 "Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience Annals of Tourism Research" 314-331, 1987

    18 Bailey, "Methods of Social Research" The Free Press 1994

    19 Wilson, "Lifestyles value-oriented" Macmillan 569-572, 1996

    20 Dann, "Leading the tourist by the nose The Tourist as a Metaphor of the Social World" CABI Publishing 209-235, 2002

    21 Ewert, "Individual and setting attributes of the adventure recreation experience" 177-191, 1994

    22 Campbell, "Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research" Houghton Miifflin Company 1963

    23 O’sullivan, "Experience Marketing" Publishing Inc 1998

    24 Cook, "Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings" Houghton Mifflin Company 1979

    25 _, "Customer experience places:the new offering frontier" 30 (30): 4-11, 2002

    26 Williams, "Contributions of time and subject to variation in recreation experience preference measurement Journal of Leisure Research" 57-68, 1988

    27 "Annals of Tourism Research" 198419-39

    28 MacCannell, "A New Theory of the Leisure Class" 1976

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.95 1.95 1.78
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.8 1.82 2.049 0.92
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼