전후세대 작가들의 언어적 상황과 정체성 혼란의 문제

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper pays attention to linguistic identity on the works of the post war generation writers. There is confusion of linguistic identity in the works of the post war generation writers who went through the colonial period in their childhood and had to learn Korean as a mother tongue after the Liberation. It can be a confusion of thoughts put between Japanese and Korean. And also it can be a imitative desire to the dominant language, English and Russian, in military administration. Furthermore, this confusion might be the feeling of disparateness for their Korean which didn`t seem to be fluent Korean though they speak Korean and as well that none can speak Japanese perfectly if they study. Desire of the acquisition of a language that a writer shows through the characters is connected with real desire of a writer and the readers. The possibility which can read 1950s~60s novels again with a new way is placed on the desire of the writers that the writers want to raise themselves to the position of the narrator of the main narrative through the most dominant acquisition of a language. This paper also is focused on that the each character experienced the historical events and in those situations they showed the process of choosing the reasonable language in the works of the post war generation writers. The dominant authority of each era requires a suitable linguistic user in each period. In considering the works of the post war generation writers, the important thing is what relation Japanese used by the writers have with the characters` system of thinking and what influence the language used by a foreigner in the novels have upon the whole text. At this point, we are met with the restlessness and sorrow of the writers who went through the history that cannot be replaced the language with the ideology or the consciousness. In the present paper I shall consider what kind of political and social problem the negotiation aspects and the linguistic conflicts of the characters is concealing at the rear in the post war generation literature, and how this problem is connecting with the writers` linguistic identities.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김윤식, "현대사를 어떻게 볼 것인가 2" 동아일보사 1988

2 조남현, "한국현대소설의 해부" 문예출판사 1993

3 중앙일보 현대사연구팀, "한국현대사" 중앙일보사 1996

4 방민호, "한국 전후문학과 세대" 향연 2003

5 조이제, "한국 근대화,기적의 과정" 월간조선사 2005

6 조남현, "침묵 깬 장용학의 면모, 한국문학의 저변" 새미 1995

7 한수영, "전후소설에서의 식민화된 주체와 언어적 타자" 영남대학교인문과학연구소 52 : 1-33, 2007

8 한수영, "전후세대의 문학과 언어적 정체성―전후세대의 이중언어적 상황을 중심으로" 대동문화연구원 12 (12): 257-301, 2007

9 김진기, "전후 현실의 극단적 자화상 손창섭" 건국대학교출판부 2003

10 장용학, "장용학 문학전집" 국학자료원 2002

11 오영섭, "이승만과 한글파동, 1950년대 한국사의 재조명" 선인 2004

12 三浦信孝, "언어제국주의란 무엇인가" 돌베게 2005

13 Calvet,Louis-Jean, "언어와 식민주의" 유로서적 2004

14 Pinker,Steven, "언어본능" 그린비 2000

15 김광해, "어휘 연구의 실제와 응용" 집문당 1995

16 손창섭, "손창섭 단편전집" 가람기획 2005

17 선우휘, "선우휘 문학선집" 조선일보사 1987

18 "문학과 지성, 문학예술, 사상계, 세대, 신동아, 시와 비평, 신태양, 자유문학, 지성, 현대공론, 현대문학"

19 김정숙, "문자사용의 층위와 과도기적 언어의식" 한국언어문학회 58 : 387-411, 2006

20 서석배, "단일 언어 사회를 향해" 동국대학교한국문학연구소 29 : 185-219, 2005

21 이익성, "근대사의 역동성과 문학적 변용 선우휘" 건국대학교출판부 2004

22 최성실, "근대,다중의 나선" 소명 2005

23 박갑수, "국어의 표현과 순화론" 태학사 1984

24 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" 집문당 1993

25 민현식, "국어 순화정책의 회고와 전망" 국립국어연구원 205-249, 2002

26 정시호, "21세기의 세계 언어전쟁" 경북대학교출판부 2000

27 노영기, "1960년대 한국의 근대화와 지식인" 선인 2004

28 김윤식, "1950년대 문학 연구" 문학사와비평연구회 1987

29 고 은, "1950년대" 향연 2005