RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    계속기업특기사항과 보수주의 = Unqualified Opinion with Going Concern and Conservatism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101975398

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We investigate the relationship between the unqualified opinion with going-concern uncertainty in explanatory paragraph(GC) and accounting conservatism for the audit reports from 2000 to 2010. We also analyze whether the Big 4 audit firms have a higher propensity of GC opinion or not. Two explanations can be provided on why the GC firms have incentives for conservative accounting. First, as GC firms generally suffer from serious financial distresses, as well as face going concern uncertainty, their managers readily try to dispose of the assets by underestimation of valuation to reduce the liabilities as one of method of reconstruction. Second, as the auditors associating with the firms of going concern uncertainty which may lead to high business failure risks, they have a high potential risk of litigations through clients` financial distress. Accordingly, the auditors would request their clients to do the conservative accounting to reduce their litigation risks. These two aspects leads the firms a conservative accounting. Our findings are as follows. First, there exists significantly positive relationship between the GC firms and the conservative accounting. This result reflects the auditor`s conservatism to the GC firms and the managers` efforts to get out of the GC opinion for the subsequent year. Second, we find no consistent results in proving differences in GC opinion propensity between Big4 firms and others. The results in this study provide the accounting information users and investors with practical implications and understandings for auditor`s roles for GC firms. The auditors who issued GC opinion give their clients pressures for a conservative accounting to reduce their litigation risks. Also the managers who receive GC opinions from auditors accept conservative accounting to avoid the same GC opinion in subsequent years. This study contributes the generalization of results by using the eleven years period of stable samples for evaluation of GC firms` conservative accounting in Korea.
    번역하기

    We investigate the relationship between the unqualified opinion with going-concern uncertainty in explanatory paragraph(GC) and accounting conservatism for the audit reports from 2000 to 2010. We also analyze whether the Big 4 audit firms have a highe...

    We investigate the relationship between the unqualified opinion with going-concern uncertainty in explanatory paragraph(GC) and accounting conservatism for the audit reports from 2000 to 2010. We also analyze whether the Big 4 audit firms have a higher propensity of GC opinion or not. Two explanations can be provided on why the GC firms have incentives for conservative accounting. First, as GC firms generally suffer from serious financial distresses, as well as face going concern uncertainty, their managers readily try to dispose of the assets by underestimation of valuation to reduce the liabilities as one of method of reconstruction. Second, as the auditors associating with the firms of going concern uncertainty which may lead to high business failure risks, they have a high potential risk of litigations through clients` financial distress. Accordingly, the auditors would request their clients to do the conservative accounting to reduce their litigation risks. These two aspects leads the firms a conservative accounting. Our findings are as follows. First, there exists significantly positive relationship between the GC firms and the conservative accounting. This result reflects the auditor`s conservatism to the GC firms and the managers` efforts to get out of the GC opinion for the subsequent year. Second, we find no consistent results in proving differences in GC opinion propensity between Big4 firms and others. The results in this study provide the accounting information users and investors with practical implications and understandings for auditor`s roles for GC firms. The auditors who issued GC opinion give their clients pressures for a conservative accounting to reduce their litigation risks. Also the managers who receive GC opinions from auditors accept conservative accounting to avoid the same GC opinion in subsequent years. This study contributes the generalization of results by using the eleven years period of stable samples for evaluation of GC firms` conservative accounting in Korea.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최정호, "회계제도개선과 감사품질이 재량적 발생의 크기와 정보성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 107-149, 2005

    2 백원선, "회계제도 개혁과 보수주의간의 관계" 한국공인회계사회 (52) : 197-223, 2010

    3 나종길, "회계발생액과 차별적 감사수요" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 1-32, 2003

    4 박종일, "재량적발생액을 이용한 감사인의 감사품질 분석" 1999

    5 주인기, "외부감사 실무를 위한 산업별-기업규모별 준거감사시간의 산정- Big 4 회계법인의 상장기업 감사시간 자료를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 16 (16): 35-64, 2007

    6 지현미, "소송위험이 감사시간과 감사인의 보수주의 성향에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (43) : 311-336, 2006

    7 이윤원, "계속기업의문 특기사항의 정보효과" 한국회계학회 12 (12): 87-106, 2003

    8 손성규, "계속기업과 관련된 변형된 의견의 의미" 한국회계학회 11 (11): 25-50, 2002

    9 손성규, "계속기업 의문에 대한 감사인 의견 표명의 자체예언실현효과" 한국회계학회 14 (14): 169-190, 2005

    10 백원선, "감사인의 유형과 보수주의" 한국공인회계사회 (41) : 241-260, 2005

    1 최정호, "회계제도개선과 감사품질이 재량적 발생의 크기와 정보성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 107-149, 2005

    2 백원선, "회계제도 개혁과 보수주의간의 관계" 한국공인회계사회 (52) : 197-223, 2010

    3 나종길, "회계발생액과 차별적 감사수요" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 1-32, 2003

    4 박종일, "재량적발생액을 이용한 감사인의 감사품질 분석" 1999

    5 주인기, "외부감사 실무를 위한 산업별-기업규모별 준거감사시간의 산정- Big 4 회계법인의 상장기업 감사시간 자료를 중심으로" 한국회계학회 16 (16): 35-64, 2007

    6 지현미, "소송위험이 감사시간과 감사인의 보수주의 성향에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (43) : 311-336, 2006

    7 이윤원, "계속기업의문 특기사항의 정보효과" 한국회계학회 12 (12): 87-106, 2003

    8 손성규, "계속기업과 관련된 변형된 의견의 의미" 한국회계학회 11 (11): 25-50, 2002

    9 손성규, "계속기업 의문에 대한 감사인 의견 표명의 자체예언실현효과" 한국회계학회 14 (14): 169-190, 2005

    10 백원선, "감사인의 유형과 보수주의" 한국공인회계사회 (41) : 241-260, 2005

    11 강내철, "감사인의 위험회피성향이 회계처리의 보수성에 미치는 영향" 한국공인회계사회 (43) : 427-450, 2006

    12 김명인, "감사인의 감사 및 비감사 보수와 고객기업의 보수적 회계처리 수준 사이의 관계" 한국회계학회 33 (33): 175-210, 2008

    13 李孝翊, "保守主義 適用과 監査人間의 品質 差異 硏究" 한국공인회계사회 (38) : 2002

    14 Feltham, J., "Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities" 11 (11): 689-731, 1995

    15 Jensen, M., "Theory of the Firm Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 3 : 5-360, 1976

    16 Krishnan, J., "The Role of Economic Trade-offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis" 11 (11): 565-586, 1996

    17 Holthausen, R. W., "The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting" 31 : 3-75, 2001

    18 Qiang, X, "The Effects of Contracting, Litigation, Regulation, and Tax Costs on Conditional and Unconditional Conservatism: Cross-Sectional Evidence at the Firm Level" 82 (82): 759-797, 2007

    19 DeFond, M. L., "The Effect of SOX on Small Auditor Exits and Audit Quality" 52 : 21-40, 2011

    20 Becker, C., "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management" 15 (15): 1-24, 1998

    21 Basu, S, "The Conservatism Principle and The Asymmetric Timeless of Earnings" 24 : 3-37, 1997

    22 Givoly, D., "The Changing Time-series Properties of Earnings, Cash-flows and Accruals : Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative?" 29 : 287-320, 2000

    23 Asare, S. K, "The Auditor's Going-Concern Decision: Interaction of Task Variables and Sequential Processing of Evidence" 67 (67): 379-393, 1992

    24 Geiger, M., "Recent Changes in the Association between Bankruptcies and Prior Audit Opinion" 24 : 21-35, 2005

    25 Watts, R. L., "Positive Accounting Theory" Prentice-Hall 1986

    26 Kothari, S. P., "Performance Matched Dis-cretionary Accrual Measures" 39 (39): 163-197, 2005

    27 Francis, J. R.., "Office Size of Big4 Auditors and Audit Quality" 84 (84): 1521-1552, 2009

    28 Ryan, S. G., "Identifying Conditional Conservatism" 15 (15): 511-525, 2006

    29 Tucker, R. R., "Going-concern Judgments : An Experimental Test of The Self-fulfilling Prophecy and Forecast Accuracy" 22 : 401-432, 2003

    30 Altman, E. I., "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and The Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy" 23 : 589-609, 1968

    31 Hsu, A. W., "Financial Distress and the Earnings-Sensitivity-Difference Measure of Conservatism" 47 (47): 284-314, 2011

    32 Ball, R, "Earnings Quality in UK Private Firms: Com- parative Loss Recognition Timeliness" 39 : 83-128, 2005

    33 Ball, R., "Earnings Quality at Initial Public Offerings" 45 : 324-349, 2008

    34 Jones, J, "Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigation" 29 (29): 193-228, 1991

    35 DeFond, M. L., "Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinion" 40 : 1247-1274, 2002

    36 Weber, T., "Do Expert Informational Intermediaries Add Value? Evidence from Auditors in Micro IPOs" 41 : 681-720, 2003

    37 Bartov, E., "Discretionary-Accruals Models and Audit Qualifications" 30 : 421-451, 2000

    38 Basu, S, L., "Differences in Conservatism Between Big- eight and Non-big Eight Auditors" Emory University 2001

    39 Crey, P. J., "Costs Associated With Going- concern Modified Audit Opinions: An Analysis of the Australian Audit Market" 44 (44): 61-81, 2008

    40 Watts, R. L, "Conservatism in Accounting Part II: Evidence and Research Opportunities" 278-301, 2003

    41 Watts, R. L., "Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanation and Im- plications" 207-221, 2003

    42 Watts, R. L, "Conservatism in Accounting Part I : Explanations and Im-plications" 17 (17): 207-221, 2003

    43 Fargher, N., "Changes in The Audit Environment and Auditor's Propensity to issue Going-Concern Opinions" 27 (27): 55-77, 2008

    44 황인태, "Big4 감사품질의 우수성은 모든 규모의 기업에 적용되는가?" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 1-34, 2009

    45 Chung, R., "Auditor Conservatism and Reported Earnings" 33 (33): 19-32, 2003

    46 Lu, T., "Auditor Conservatism and Investment Efficiency" 84 (84): 1933-1958, 2009

    47 Feldmann, D. A., "Auditor Conservatism after Enron" 29 (29): 267-278, 2010

    48 DeAngelo, L. E., "Audit Size and Audit Quality" 3 : 183-199, 1981

    49 Lennox, C, "Audit Quality and Executive Offices' Affiliation with CPA Firms" 39 (39): 201-231, 2005

    50 Geiger, M., "Audit Firm Size and Going-concern Reporting Accuracy" 20 (20): 1-17, 2006

    51 Geiger, M., "Audit Fees, Non-audit Fees, and Auditor Reporting on Stressed Companies" 16 : 17-26, 2003

    52 DeFond, M. L, "Audit Change and Discretionary Accruals" 25 : 35-68, 1998

    53 Dietrich, R. J., "Asymmetric Timeliness Tests of Accounting Conservatism" 12 : 95-124, 2007

    54 Lennox, C, "Are Large Auditors more Accurate than Small Auditors?" 29 (29): 217-227, 1999

    55 Marty B., "An Empirical Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Its Association with Abnormal Accruals" 37 : 139-165, 2004

    56 Hendricksen, E., "Accounting Theory" Irwin 1982

    57 Francis, J. R., "Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism" 16 (16): 135-165, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 1.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.35 1.43 2.629 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼