RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털 학습 환경에서 학습자 중심 피드백 설계 원리 및 전략에 대한 이론적 탐색 = Exploring Learner-Centered Feedback Design Principles and Strategies for Digital Learning Environments

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the field of educational research and practice, feedback has long been believed to yield positive effects on learning. Practitioners and researchers have made many efforts to provide learners with feedback that is as frequent and detailed as possible. Especially in digital learning environments, feedback is designed as a crucial element of digital contents. The purpose of the current theoretical exploration is to derive a set of principles and strategies for designing feedback that can be implemented in digital learning environments. This study also attempts to extend the traditional teacher-centered feedback into learner-centered feedback, which each learner actively collects not only from teachers but also from the task at hand, the environment, and peer learners. Feedback in the digital environment must be designed with consideration for learners’ intrinsic motivation, provide more valid and reliable information, and facilitate social knowledge construction with peer learners using digital technologies. Consequently, feedback in the digital learning environment should be approached from multiple perspectives. This study explores the following three types of feedback: (1) the internal feedback that can be provoked by the learning environment or learning tasks; (2) the external feedback that can be offered by teachers or experts; and (3) the peer feedback from peer learners. Synthetically analyzing Csikszentmihaly’s (1975, 1990) theory of flow, Kluger & DeNisi’ (1996) feedback intervention theory, and Miyake’s (1986) study of constructive criticism between collaborating peer learners, the derived principles and strategies are categorized as follows: (1) environment design principles and strategies that stimulate internal feedback, (2) external feedback design principles and strategies, and (3) environment design principles and strategies that facilitate peer feedback. Both empirical and theoretical future research recommendations are suggested based on the limitations of this study. This study may aid in initiating learner-centered feedback research that considers learners, technologies, and resources available in the digital learning environment.
      번역하기

      In the field of educational research and practice, feedback has long been believed to yield positive effects on learning. Practitioners and researchers have made many efforts to provide learners with feedback that is as frequent and detailed as possib...

      In the field of educational research and practice, feedback has long been believed to yield positive effects on learning. Practitioners and researchers have made many efforts to provide learners with feedback that is as frequent and detailed as possible. Especially in digital learning environments, feedback is designed as a crucial element of digital contents. The purpose of the current theoretical exploration is to derive a set of principles and strategies for designing feedback that can be implemented in digital learning environments. This study also attempts to extend the traditional teacher-centered feedback into learner-centered feedback, which each learner actively collects not only from teachers but also from the task at hand, the environment, and peer learners. Feedback in the digital environment must be designed with consideration for learners’ intrinsic motivation, provide more valid and reliable information, and facilitate social knowledge construction with peer learners using digital technologies. Consequently, feedback in the digital learning environment should be approached from multiple perspectives. This study explores the following three types of feedback: (1) the internal feedback that can be provoked by the learning environment or learning tasks; (2) the external feedback that can be offered by teachers or experts; and (3) the peer feedback from peer learners. Synthetically analyzing Csikszentmihaly’s (1975, 1990) theory of flow, Kluger & DeNisi’ (1996) feedback intervention theory, and Miyake’s (1986) study of constructive criticism between collaborating peer learners, the derived principles and strategies are categorized as follows: (1) environment design principles and strategies that stimulate internal feedback, (2) external feedback design principles and strategies, and (3) environment design principles and strategies that facilitate peer feedback. Both empirical and theoretical future research recommendations are suggested based on the limitations of this study. This study may aid in initiating learner-centered feedback research that considers learners, technologies, and resources available in the digital learning environment.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "몰입의 기술" 더불어책 2003

      2 이영주, "동료피드백 활동을 통한 예비교사들의 수업설계능력 향상에 관한 연구: ASSURE모형활용 수업지도안 작성을 중심으로" 한국교육공학회 28 (28): 687-706, 2012

      3 지은림, "교사의 피드백 수행을 위한 구성요인 및 특성에 관한 연구" 교육연구소 10 (10): 77-102, 2009

      4 Sims-Knight, J., "What’s wrong with giving students feedback?" American Society for Engineering Education 2001

      5 Cho, K., "Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives" 98 (98): 891-901, 2006

      6 Hepplestone, S., "Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback : A literature review" 19 (19): 117-127, 2011

      7 Chai, L., "To have or have not: An examination of feedback, learner control and knowledge type in online learning" IEEE Computer Society 2003

      8 Moore, M. G., "Theory of transactional distance, In Theoretical principles of distance education" Routledge 1993

      9 Moore, M. G., "Theory of transactional distance, In Handbook of distance education" Lawrence Erlbaum 89-101, 2007

      10 Rha, I., "The role of CAI feedback in acquiring declarative and hierarchical knowledge in the context of social science concept learning" Indiana University 1988

      1 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "몰입의 기술" 더불어책 2003

      2 이영주, "동료피드백 활동을 통한 예비교사들의 수업설계능력 향상에 관한 연구: ASSURE모형활용 수업지도안 작성을 중심으로" 한국교육공학회 28 (28): 687-706, 2012

      3 지은림, "교사의 피드백 수행을 위한 구성요인 및 특성에 관한 연구" 교육연구소 10 (10): 77-102, 2009

      4 Sims-Knight, J., "What’s wrong with giving students feedback?" American Society for Engineering Education 2001

      5 Cho, K., "Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives" 98 (98): 891-901, 2006

      6 Hepplestone, S., "Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback : A literature review" 19 (19): 117-127, 2011

      7 Chai, L., "To have or have not: An examination of feedback, learner control and knowledge type in online learning" IEEE Computer Society 2003

      8 Moore, M. G., "Theory of transactional distance, In Theoretical principles of distance education" Routledge 1993

      9 Moore, M. G., "Theory of transactional distance, In Handbook of distance education" Lawrence Erlbaum 89-101, 2007

      10 Rha, I., "The role of CAI feedback in acquiring declarative and hierarchical knowledge in the context of social science concept learning" Indiana University 1988

      11 Hattie, J., "The power of feedback" 77 (77): 81-112, 2007

      12 Wellman, B., "The network is personal" 29 (29): 349-356, 2007

      13 Crampton, C., "The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration" 12 (12): 346-371, 2001

      14 Kluger, A. N., "The effects of feedback interventions on performance : A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory" 119 (119): 254-284, 1996

      15 Schooler, L. J., "The disruptive potential of immediate feedback" Cognitive Science Society 1990

      16 Dede, C., "The Evolution of distance education : Emerging technologies and distributed. learning" 10 (10): 4-36, 1996

      17 Butler, R., "Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation : Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance" 79 (79): 474-482, 1987

      18 Cho, K., "Student revision with peer and expert reviewing" 20 (20): 328-338, 2010

      19 Cho, K., "Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline : A web-based reciprocal peer review system" 48 (48): 409-426, 2007

      20 Merry, S., "Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students" Routledge 2013

      21 Carroll, J. M., "Prompting, feedback and error correction in the design of a scenario machine" 28 : 11-27, 1988

      22 Strijbos, J. W., "Peer feedback content and the sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?" 20 (20): 291-303, 2010

      23 Liu, N. F., "Peer feedback : The learning element of peer assessment" 11 (11): 279-290, 2006

      24 Billman, D., "Observational learning from internal feedback : A simulation of an adaptive learning method" 12 : 587-625, 1988

      25 Schmidt, R., "New conceptualizations of practice : Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training" 3 (3): 207-217, 1992

      26 Kanfer, R., "Motivation and cognitive abilities : An intergrative/ aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition" 74 (74): 657-690, 1989

      27 Jackson, S., "Model-It: A design retrospective, In Advanced designs for the technologies of learning: Innovations in science and mathematics education" Erlbaum 2000

      28 Harris, M. J., "Mediation of interpersonal expectancies effects : 31 Meta-analyses" 97 : 363-386, 1985

      29 Howland, J., "Meaningful learning with technology" Pearson 2011

      30 Scardamalia, M., "Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work, In Encyclopedia of distributed learning" Sage Publications 269-272, 2003

      31 Smith, H., "Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment : A case for student and staff development" 39 (39): 71-81, 2002

      32 Narciss, S., "How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning, In Instructional design for multimedia learning" Waxmann 181-195, 2004

      33 Charney, D., "Goal setting and procedure selection in acquiring computer skills : A comparison of tutorials, problem solving and learning exploration" 7 (7): 323-342, 1990

      34 Schartel, S. A., "Giving feedback : An integral part of education" 26 : 77-87, 2012

      35 Topping, K. J., "Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students" 25 (25): 149-169, 2000

      36 Rochera, M. J., "Formative feedback in digital learning environment" 23 : 1-6, 2013

      37 Shute, V. J., "Focus on formative feedback" 78 (78): 153-188, 2008

      38 Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Flow" 한울림 2004

      39 Mory, E. H., "Feedback research, In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology" Erlbaum 919-956, 2001

      40 William, B., "Feedback in the digital environment, In Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well" Routledge 125-139, 2013

      41 Boud, D., "Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well" Routledge 2013

      42 Butler, D., "Feedback and self-regulated learning : A theoretical synthesis" 65 (65): 245-281, 1995

      43 Duval, T. S., "Effects of self-focus, discrepancy between self and standard, and outcome expectancy favorability on the tendency to match self to standard or to withdraw" 62 (62): 340-348, 1992

      44 Holmes, B., "E-learning: Concepts and practice" Sage Publishing 2006

      45 Clark, R., "E-learning and the science of instruction" Pfeiffer 2003

      46 Moreno, R., "Decreasing cognitive load for novice students : Effects of explanary versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia" 32 : 99-113, 2004

      47 Dron, J., "Control and constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose" Information Science Publishing 2007

      48 Miyake, N., "Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding" 10 : 151-177, 1986

      49 Gibbs, G., "Conditions under which assessment supports students' learing" 1 : 3-31, 2004

      50 Lepper, M., "Children and computers : Approaching the twenty-first century" 44 : 170-178, 1989

      51 Cohen, V. B., "A reexamination of feedback in computer-based instruction : Implications for instructional design" 25 (25): 33-37, 1985

      52 Azevedo, R., "A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction" 13 (13): 111-127, 1995

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼