RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동북아 해양패권 경쟁에 대한 이론적 고찰 -신현실주의와 신자유주의 시각을 중심으로- = Competition for Maritime Hegemony in the Northeast Asia: Perspectives of Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892354

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As George Modelski and William Thompson argue that modern world system is an “oceanic system,” one has to focus on the competition for the maritime hegemony to understand geopolitics in the Northeast Asia. The regime of freedom of the seas is in distress in the 21st century East Asia as the US hegemony over the ocean is checked by the growth of the Chinese anti-access/area-denial forces. The realists think order and peace are established through the balance of power while the liberals think they are established through cooperation within international regimes. Theorists of both streams share prospects of peace between the US and China either through balance of power or cooperation in the liberal international regime. What is problematic is that the peaceful relationship between the two world powers could not necessary extend to the security of the regional countries surrounding continental China. Small countries under pressure from China would invite the US to keep maritime hegemony in this region. Korea can secure its position through strengthening of a liberal regime in this region, as it is joining the complex interdependence among advanced industrial democracies. Korea-US-Japan cooperation can reach out China for regional stability and develop a favorable environment for the peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsula.
      번역하기

      As George Modelski and William Thompson argue that modern world system is an “oceanic system,” one has to focus on the competition for the maritime hegemony to understand geopolitics in the Northeast Asia. The regime of freedom of the seas is in d...

      As George Modelski and William Thompson argue that modern world system is an “oceanic system,” one has to focus on the competition for the maritime hegemony to understand geopolitics in the Northeast Asia. The regime of freedom of the seas is in distress in the 21st century East Asia as the US hegemony over the ocean is checked by the growth of the Chinese anti-access/area-denial forces. The realists think order and peace are established through the balance of power while the liberals think they are established through cooperation within international regimes. Theorists of both streams share prospects of peace between the US and China either through balance of power or cooperation in the liberal international regime. What is problematic is that the peaceful relationship between the two world powers could not necessary extend to the security of the regional countries surrounding continental China. Small countries under pressure from China would invite the US to keep maritime hegemony in this region. Korea can secure its position through strengthening of a liberal regime in this region, as it is joining the complex interdependence among advanced industrial democracies. Korea-US-Japan cooperation can reach out China for regional stability and develop a favorable environment for the peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsula.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 연현식, "중국의 부상과 동북아 신안보질서의 형성" 동서문제연구원 21 (21): 107-138, 2009

      2 문흥호, "중국의 강대국화 전략과 한·일 관계" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 41-66, 2010

      3 이동률, "중국의 강대국화 외교전략과 과제" 국가안전보장문제연구소 53 (53): 1-24, 2010

      4 정진영, "국제정치 이론논쟁의 현황과 전망" 40 (40): 2000

      5 Robert Gilpin, "War and Change in World Politics" Cambridge University Press 1981

      6 Kenneth N. Waltz, "Theory of International Politics" Newbery Award Records 1979

      7 Salvatore Babones, "The Middling Kingdom" 90 (90): 2011

      8 Alfred Mahan, "The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783" Sagamore Press 1957

      9 Arvind Subramaian, "The Inevitable Superpower" 90 (90): 2011

      10 Hedley Bull, "The Anarchic Society" Columbia University Press 1977

      1 연현식, "중국의 부상과 동북아 신안보질서의 형성" 동서문제연구원 21 (21): 107-138, 2009

      2 문흥호, "중국의 강대국화 전략과 한·일 관계" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 41-66, 2010

      3 이동률, "중국의 강대국화 외교전략과 과제" 국가안전보장문제연구소 53 (53): 1-24, 2010

      4 정진영, "국제정치 이론논쟁의 현황과 전망" 40 (40): 2000

      5 Robert Gilpin, "War and Change in World Politics" Cambridge University Press 1981

      6 Kenneth N. Waltz, "Theory of International Politics" Newbery Award Records 1979

      7 Salvatore Babones, "The Middling Kingdom" 90 (90): 2011

      8 Alfred Mahan, "The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783" Sagamore Press 1957

      9 Arvind Subramaian, "The Inevitable Superpower" 90 (90): 2011

      10 Hedley Bull, "The Anarchic Society" Columbia University Press 1977

      11 George Modelski, "Seapower in Global Politics, 1494-1993" University of Washington Press 1988

      12 Robert Keohane, "Power and Interdependence" Little, Brown 1977

      13 Karl Deutsch, "Political Community and the North Atlantic Area" Princeton University Press 1957

      14 John Ikenberry, "Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition" Polity Press 2006

      15 John Ikenberry, "Liberal Leviathan: The Origin, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order" Princeton University Press 2011

      16 Michael Doyle, "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs" 12 (12): 1983

      17 Steven D. Krasner, "International Regimes" Cornell University Press 1983

      18 Bruce Russett, "Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World" Princeton University Press 1994

      19 US Department of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2011" US Government Printing Office 2011

      20 Robert J.Art, "America's Grand Strategy and world Politics" Routledge 2009

      21 Robert O.Keohane, "After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" Princeton University Press 1984

      22 김태운, "'신현실주의'와 '신자유주의'의 국제정치관 : 인식의 공유와 차이" 한국정치정보학회 8 (8): 190-211, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼