RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      교사들의 교육과정 재구성 실천 경험에 대한 사례연구 = Teachers` Experience of Reconstructing National Curriculum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76552024

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of teachers` experience of reconstructing national curriculum. For this purpose, two cases were selected. One was an individual teacher`s reconstruction of national curriculum and the other was teachers` collaborative reconstruction of national curriculum. Employing various methods including interviews, observations, and collection of curriculum materials, this study investigated the reasons, purposes, and methods of teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum and the issues or difficulties teachers encountered while reconstructing national curriculum. The findings showed that teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum focused on the method of teaching curriculum. Teachers rarely reconstructed the content of curriculum. Their reconstruction focused on how to effectively teach curriculum, that is, method. The separation of content and method in teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum was mostly due to the standardized test. Because the standardized test was taken from the national curriculum, teachers needed to cover all the content in the curriculum and so had little discretion to reconstruct the content. Teachers` collaboration would help resolve some of these issues, but it also presented other issues. Often collaboration was imposed upon teachers and so it became distorted. Under these difficulties teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum became very limited and rather reinforced the role of delivering the curriculum to students.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of teachers` experience of reconstructing national curriculum. For this purpose, two cases were selected. One was an individual teacher`s reconstruction of national curriculum and the oth...

      The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of teachers` experience of reconstructing national curriculum. For this purpose, two cases were selected. One was an individual teacher`s reconstruction of national curriculum and the other was teachers` collaborative reconstruction of national curriculum. Employing various methods including interviews, observations, and collection of curriculum materials, this study investigated the reasons, purposes, and methods of teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum and the issues or difficulties teachers encountered while reconstructing national curriculum. The findings showed that teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum focused on the method of teaching curriculum. Teachers rarely reconstructed the content of curriculum. Their reconstruction focused on how to effectively teach curriculum, that is, method. The separation of content and method in teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum was mostly due to the standardized test. Because the standardized test was taken from the national curriculum, teachers needed to cover all the content in the curriculum and so had little discretion to reconstruct the content. Teachers` collaboration would help resolve some of these issues, but it also presented other issues. Often collaboration was imposed upon teachers and so it became distorted. Under these difficulties teachers` reconstruction of national curriculum became very limited and rather reinforced the role of delivering the curriculum to students.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 교육부, "초등학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      2 교육부, "초·중등학교 교육과정:국민공통 기본 교육과정"

      3 교육인적자원부, "초·중등학교 교육과정"

      4 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      5 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      6 김대현, "국민학교 저학년 수준의 교육과정 재구성을 위한 방법" 부산교육대학교 초등교육연구소 4 (4): 1994

      7 교육부, "국민학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      8 교육부, "고등학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      1 교육부, "초등학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      2 교육부, "초·중등학교 교육과정:국민공통 기본 교육과정"

      3 교육인적자원부, "초·중등학교 교육과정"

      4 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      5 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      6 김대현, "국민학교 저학년 수준의 교육과정 재구성을 위한 방법" 부산교육대학교 초등교육연구소 4 (4): 1994

      7 교육부, "국민학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      8 교육부, "고등학교 교육과정 해설(I)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼