RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계: 정서지능의 조절효과 = Emotional Intelligence as a Moderator of the Relationship between Machiavellianism and Reciprocity

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103640668

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the relationship between Machiavellianism and two types of reciprocity: positive reciprocity and negative reciprocity. We used the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), Christie and Geis' Machiavellianism Scale (Mach-IV) and the Personal Norm of Reciprocity (PNR) questionnaires (N = 367). The results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that the interaction of machiavellianism and emotional intelligence was significant on both types of reciprocity. Regarding the moderation of emotional intelligence, results showed that the aspects of moderation differed between the two types of reciprocity. In positive reciprocity, emotional intelligence buffered the negative effect of machiavellianism on positive reciprocity, whereas in negative reciprocity, emotional intelligence strengthened the positive effect of machiavellianism on negative reciprocity. These results could be explained by a recent research that emotional intelligence is the capacity to adapt one's response flexibly in accordance with others' behaviors and strategies. And this aspect of emotional intelligence suggests that when emotional intelligence interacts with machiavellianism, it can either have buffering or strengthening effect, depending on the social context.
    번역하기

    This study examines the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the relationship between Machiavellianism and two types of reciprocity: positive reciprocity and negative reciprocity. We used the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), ...

    This study examines the moderating role of emotional intelligence on the relationship between Machiavellianism and two types of reciprocity: positive reciprocity and negative reciprocity. We used the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), Christie and Geis' Machiavellianism Scale (Mach-IV) and the Personal Norm of Reciprocity (PNR) questionnaires (N = 367). The results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that the interaction of machiavellianism and emotional intelligence was significant on both types of reciprocity. Regarding the moderation of emotional intelligence, results showed that the aspects of moderation differed between the two types of reciprocity. In positive reciprocity, emotional intelligence buffered the negative effect of machiavellianism on positive reciprocity, whereas in negative reciprocity, emotional intelligence strengthened the positive effect of machiavellianism on negative reciprocity. These results could be explained by a recent research that emotional intelligence is the capacity to adapt one's response flexibly in accordance with others' behaviors and strategies. And this aspect of emotional intelligence suggests that when emotional intelligence interacts with machiavellianism, it can either have buffering or strengthening effect, depending on the social context.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구는 마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계에서 정서지능의 조절효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 총 367명(여성 208명, 남성 159명)의 참가자들에게 마키아벨리즘 척도(Mach - IV: Christie and Geis’ Machiavellianism scale), 정서지능 척도(Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence scale), 호혜성 척도(Personal Norm of Reciprocity)가 포함된 설문을 실시하였다. 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 기존에 호혜성에 영향을 미친다고 알려진 변인들의 영향을 통제한 후에도 마키아벨리즘과 정서지능의 상호작용이 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 각각에서 유의하게 나타났다. 하지만 정서지능의 조절효과는 마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계에 따라 상이한 양상을 보였다. 긍정적 호혜성의 경우, 정서지능은 마키아벨리즘이 긍정적 호혜성에 미치는 부적 영향을 완화시켰다. 이와 반대로 부정적 호혜성에서 정서지능은 마키아벨리즘이 부정적 호혜성에 미치는 정적 영향을 강화시켰다. 이러한 결과는 정서지능이 대인 간 상호작용 맥락에 따라 유연하게 자신의 전략을 조절할 수 있다는 최근 연구들의 결과를 뒷받침하는 것이며, 정서지능의 이러한 유연성 특성이 마키아벨리즘 성격과 상호작용 할 때에는 사회적 맥락에 따라 마키아벨리즘의 영향력을 완충 또는 강화시킬 수 있다는 가능성을 시사한다.
    번역하기

    본 연구는 마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계에서 정서지능의 조절효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 총 367명(여성 208명, 남성 159명)의 참가자들에게 마키아벨리즘 척도(M...

    본 연구는 마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계에서 정서지능의 조절효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 총 367명(여성 208명, 남성 159명)의 참가자들에게 마키아벨리즘 척도(Mach - IV: Christie and Geis’ Machiavellianism scale), 정서지능 척도(Wong and Law’s Emotional Intelligence scale), 호혜성 척도(Personal Norm of Reciprocity)가 포함된 설문을 실시하였다. 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 기존에 호혜성에 영향을 미친다고 알려진 변인들의 영향을 통제한 후에도 마키아벨리즘과 정서지능의 상호작용이 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 각각에서 유의하게 나타났다. 하지만 정서지능의 조절효과는 마키아벨리즘과 긍정적․부정적 호혜성 간의 관계에 따라 상이한 양상을 보였다. 긍정적 호혜성의 경우, 정서지능은 마키아벨리즘이 긍정적 호혜성에 미치는 부적 영향을 완화시켰다. 이와 반대로 부정적 호혜성에서 정서지능은 마키아벨리즘이 부정적 호혜성에 미치는 정적 영향을 강화시켰다. 이러한 결과는 정서지능이 대인 간 상호작용 맥락에 따라 유연하게 자신의 전략을 조절할 수 있다는 최근 연구들의 결과를 뒷받침하는 것이며, 정서지능의 이러한 유연성 특성이 마키아벨리즘 성격과 상호작용 할 때에는 사회적 맥락에 따라 마키아벨리즘의 영향력을 완충 또는 강화시킬 수 있다는 가능성을 시사한다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 De Cremer, D., "Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity" 15 : 5-18, 2001

    2 Fernández-Berrocal, P., "When to cooperate and when to compete : Emotional intelligence in interpersonal decision-making" 49 : 21-24, 2014

    3 Cialdini, R. B., "When tactical pronouncements of change become real change : The case of reciprocal persuasion" 63 : 30-40, 1992

    4 Ford, B. Q., "When getting angry is smart : Emotional preferences and emotional intelligence" 12 : 685-689, 2012

    5 Gunnthorsdottir, A., "Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game" 23 : 49-66, 2002

    6 Berg, J., "Trust, reciprocity, and social history" 10 : 122-142, 1995

    7 Furnham, A., "Trait emotional intelligence and happiness" 31 : 815-823, 2003

    8 Chen, Y. R., "To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship and relational-self orientation" 45 : 24-34, 2009

    9 Mealy, L., "The sociobiology of sociopathy : An integrated evolutionary model" 18 : 523-541, 1995

    10 Bereczkei, T., "The presence of others, prosocial traits, machiavellianism" 41 : 238-245, 2010

    1 De Cremer, D., "Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity" 15 : 5-18, 2001

    2 Fernández-Berrocal, P., "When to cooperate and when to compete : Emotional intelligence in interpersonal decision-making" 49 : 21-24, 2014

    3 Cialdini, R. B., "When tactical pronouncements of change become real change : The case of reciprocal persuasion" 63 : 30-40, 1992

    4 Ford, B. Q., "When getting angry is smart : Emotional preferences and emotional intelligence" 12 : 685-689, 2012

    5 Gunnthorsdottir, A., "Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game" 23 : 49-66, 2002

    6 Berg, J., "Trust, reciprocity, and social history" 10 : 122-142, 1995

    7 Furnham, A., "Trait emotional intelligence and happiness" 31 : 815-823, 2003

    8 Chen, Y. R., "To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship and relational-self orientation" 45 : 24-34, 2009

    9 Mealy, L., "The sociobiology of sociopathy : An integrated evolutionary model" 18 : 523-541, 1995

    10 Bereczkei, T., "The presence of others, prosocial traits, machiavellianism" 41 : 238-245, 2010

    11 Perugini, M., "The personal norm of reciprocity" 17 : 251-283, 2003

    12 Gouldner, A. W., "The norm of reciprocity : A preliminary statement" 25 : 161-178, 1960

    13 Bereczkei, T., "The manipulative skill : Cognitive devices and their neural correlates underlying Machiavellian’s decision making" 99 : 24-31, 2015

    14 Harrell, W. A., "The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft" 39 : 157-165, 1976

    15 Cosmides, L., "The handbook of evolutionary psychology" 584-627, 2005

    16 Axelrod, R., "The further evolution of cooperation" 242 : 1385-1390, 1988

    17 Boyd, R., "The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups" 132 : 337-356, 1988

    18 Trivers, R. L., "The evolution of reciprocal altruism" 46 : 35-57, 1971

    19 Axelrod, R., "The evolution of cooperation" 211 : 1390-1396, 1981

    20 Wong, C. S., "The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude : An exploratory study" 13 : 243-274, 2002

    21 Paulhus, D. L., "The dark triad of personality : Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy" 36 : 556-563, 2002

    22 Fehr, B., "The construct of machiavellianism : Twenty years later" 9 : 77-116, 2013

    23 Gerbasi, M. E., "The Self-and Other-Interest Inventory" 105 : 495-, 2013

    24 Côté, S., "The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence : Emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates both prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior" 22 : 1073-1080, 2011

    25 DeVore, I., "The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models" New York University Press 183-237, 1987

    26 Kerr, N. L., "That still, small voice : Commitment to cooperate as an internalized versus a social norm" 23 : 1300-1311, 1997

    27 Christie, R., "Studies in Machiavellianism" Academic Press 1970

    28 Fehr, E., "Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms" 13 : 1-25, 2002

    29 Kilduff, M., "Strategic use of emotional intelligence in organizational settings : Exploring the dark side" 30 : 129-152, 2010

    30 Trivers, R., "Social evolution" Benjamin/Cummings 479-, 1985

    31 Sutton, J., "Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?" 17 : 435-450, 1999

    32 Homans, G. C., "Social behavior: Its elementary forms" 1961

    33 Jones, D. N., "Risk in the face of retribution: Psychopathic individuals persist in financial misbehavior among the Dark Triad" 67 : 109-113, 2014

    34 Harrell, W. A., "Retaliatory aggression by high and low Machiavellians against remorseful and non-remorseful wrongdoers" 8 : 217-220, 1980

    35 Grundy, E., "Reciprocity in relationships : Socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between Third Age parents and their adult children in Great Britain" 56 : 233-255, 2005

    36 Wilkinson, G. S., "Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat" 308 : 181-184, 1984

    37 Miller, N. J., "Reciprocal exchange in rural communities : Consumers’ inducements to inshop" 14 : 637-661, 1997

    38 Wilkinson, G. S., "Reciprocal altruism in bats and other mammals" 9 : 85-100, 1988

    39 Price, M. E., "Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device" 23 : 203-231, 2002

    40 Lee, K., "Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure" 38 : 1571-1582, 2005

    41 De Waal, F. B. M., "Payment for labour in monkeys" 404 : 563-563, 2000

    42 Meyer, H. D., "Norms and self-interest in ultimatum bargaining : The prince's prudence" 13 : 215-232, 1992

    43 De Waal, F. B. M., "Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: Symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition?" 9 : 101-118, 1988

    44 Mayer, J. D., "Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence" MSCEIT. Item booklet. MHS 2002

    45 Wilson, D. S., "Machiavellianism : A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures" 119 : 285-299, 1996

    46 Cialdini, R. B., "Influence: Science and practice" Scott. Foresman 1988

    47 Wilson, D. S., "Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies" 19 : 203-212, 1998

    48 Salovey, P., "Handbook of positive psychology" Oxford University Press 159-171, 2002

    49 Jones, D. N., "Handbook of individual differences in social behavior" Guilford Press 93-108, 2009

    50 Komorita, S. S., "Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers 315-330, 1999

    51 Wilkinson, G. S., "Food sharing in vampire bats" 262 : 76-82, 1990

    52 Fehr, E., "Fairness and retaliation : The economics of reciprocity" 14 : 159-181, 2000

    53 Buss, D. M., "Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind" Allyn & Bacon 1999

    54 Hawley, P. H., "Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellianism. Handbook of personality development" 147-161, 2006

    55 Pelligra, V., "Empathy, guilt-aversion, and patterns of reciprocity" 4 : 161-, 2011

    56 Krebs, D., "Empathy and altruism" 32 : 1134-1146, 1975

    57 Lopes, P. N., "Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships" 35 : 641-658, 2003

    58 Austin, E. J., "Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?" 43 : 179-189, 2007

    59 Palmer, B., "Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction" 33 : 1091-1100, 2002

    60 Schutte, N. S., "Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations" 141 : 523-536, 2001

    61 Salovey, P., "Emotional intelligence" 9 : 185-211, 1990

    62 Mayer, J. D., "Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications" Basic Books 1997

    63 Van Lange, P. A., "Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations : theory and preliminary evidence" 73 : 733-, 1997

    64 Cosmides, L., "Cognitive adaptations for social exchange" 163-228, 1992

    65 Cummins, D. D., "Cheater detection is modified by social rank : The impact of dominance on the evolution of cognitive functions" 20 : 229-248, 1999

    66 Gallucci, M., "An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity" 13 : 367-389, 2000

    67 Schwartz, S. H., "Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 10" Academic 221-279, 1977

    68 Buss, D. M., "Adaptations for exploitation" 12 : 53-, 2008

    69 Davis, M. H., "A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy" 1980

    70 Cialdini, R. B., "A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior" 24 : 201-234, 1991

    71 Barrett, L., "A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons" 63 : 1047-1053, 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.16 1.16 0.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 1.58 1.54 0.4
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼