RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      자연재해로부터의 지역사회 회복탄력성 도입방안

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101749959

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to develop the definition of disaster resilience concept and to propose its quantification concept from a social cost perspective. The employed methods are literature review and exploratory spatial data analysis. The results are as follows; First, community disaster resilience can be defined the community’s system capacity to minimize both the magnitude and duration of community system impacts after natural disasters from the perspective of community’s target system performance. Second, the critical elements for the resilient community are (1) the systematic interconnection between capitals found in communities, (2) the substitute to ensure the level of community system performance. Third, the disaster resilience quantification can be represented as a concept of resilience cost. Fourth, resilience ratio is a useful concept to understand a certain community’s ability in responding natural disasters. Fifth, high social costs are found in Seocho-gu and Dongducheon-si from a concept of disaster resilience. Sixth, TRE(Total Recovery Eefforts) minimizing strategies are required in the regions including Ansugn-si, Secho-gu, Icheon-si, Dongducheon-si, Gangnam-gu, Sungdong-gu, Gwangjin-gu, Eunpyeong-gu, Joong-go, Yangpyeong-gun. Seventh, LISA shows that Yeoju-si and the north parts of Gyeonggi-do have a homeogenous spatial relationship.
      Based on the results, four policy implications are addressed. First, a sophisticated quantification method needs to be developed. Second, we need a strategy to share responsibility in dealing natural disasters with citizens. Third, we need a substitute development and management system. Fourth, Gyeonggi-do needs to adopt a resilience concept in disaster management policies and to show interest in R&D.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to develop the definition of disaster resilience concept and to propose its quantification concept from a social cost perspective. The employed methods are literature review and exploratory spatial data analysis. The resul...

      The purpose of this study is to develop the definition of disaster resilience concept and to propose its quantification concept from a social cost perspective. The employed methods are literature review and exploratory spatial data analysis. The results are as follows; First, community disaster resilience can be defined the community’s system capacity to minimize both the magnitude and duration of community system impacts after natural disasters from the perspective of community’s target system performance. Second, the critical elements for the resilient community are (1) the systematic interconnection between capitals found in communities, (2) the substitute to ensure the level of community system performance. Third, the disaster resilience quantification can be represented as a concept of resilience cost. Fourth, resilience ratio is a useful concept to understand a certain community’s ability in responding natural disasters. Fifth, high social costs are found in Seocho-gu and Dongducheon-si from a concept of disaster resilience. Sixth, TRE(Total Recovery Eefforts) minimizing strategies are required in the regions including Ansugn-si, Secho-gu, Icheon-si, Dongducheon-si, Gangnam-gu, Sungdong-gu, Gwangjin-gu, Eunpyeong-gu, Joong-go, Yangpyeong-gun. Seventh, LISA shows that Yeoju-si and the north parts of Gyeonggi-do have a homeogenous spatial relationship.
      Based on the results, four policy implications are addressed. First, a sophisticated quantification method needs to be developed. Second, we need a strategy to share responsibility in dealing natural disasters with citizens. Third, we need a substitute development and management system. Fourth, Gyeonggi-do needs to adopt a resilience concept in disaster management policies and to show interest in R&D.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • [표지]
      • [목차]
      • 표목차
      • 그림목차
      • [Abstract]
      • [표지]
      • [목차]
      • 표목차
      • 그림목차
      • [Abstract]
      • [연구요약]
      • [제1장 서론]
      • 제1절 연구배경 및 목적
      • 제2절 연구내용 및 방법
      • [제2장 선행연구 및 개념 재정립]
      • 제1절 회복탄력성 정의
      • 제2절 회복탄력성 속성과 지표
      • 제3절 회복탄력성 개념 재정립
      • [제3장 사회적 비용 관점에서의 회복탄력성 정량화]
      • 제1절 사회적 비용 관점에서의 회복탄력성
      • 제2절 사회적 비용 관점의 회복탄력성 정량적 평가
      • [제4장 회복탄력성 주요 요소 적용사례]
      • 제1절 민간참여를 통한 유기적 시스템화 구현
      • 제2절 대체재 확보를 통한 지역사회 성능 유지
      • [제5장 결론 및 정책건의]
      • 제1절 결론
      • 제2절 정책건의
      • [참고문헌]
      • [부록]
      • [머리말]
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼