RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      직무의미창조(Job Crafting) 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구 = Development and Validation of the Job Crafting Scale

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103682600

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Job Crafting Scale in order to diagnose and assess the work attitude of employees. Specifically, it was attempted to revise the Job Crafting Scale(JCS) developed by Tims, Bakker and Derks(2012) and develop the scale comprehensively reflecting the construct of job crafting and its factors proposed by Wrzesniewski and Dutton(2001) based on the Job Demands-Resources Model of Schaufeli and Bakker(2004). The validity of the scale developed in the present study was examined with related variables. 56 preliminary questionaries were selected through literature review, and 507 employees participated in the survey. The results of the study were as follows: Firstly, the result of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the structure of the Job Crafting Scale consisted of 5 factors of 44 items, i.e., increasing cognitive job resources, increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources, increasing challenging job demands, and decreasing hindering job demands. Secondly, the convergent and discriminant validity of the Job Crafting Scale were supported. The scale was highly correlated with the JCS(r=.95, p<.001) and proactive personality(r=.74, p<.001), while it had a significantly negative correlation with cynicism(r=-.26, p<.001). Thirdly, the correlation between the Job Crafting Scale developed in the present study and various criteria of work engagement, task performance, and contextual performance were all highly significant, supporting the criterion-related validity of the Job Crafting Scale.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Job Crafting Scale in order to diagnose and assess the work attitude of employees. Specifically, it was attempted to revise the Job Crafting Scale(JCS) developed by Tims, Bakker and Derks(2012)...

      The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Job Crafting Scale in order to diagnose and assess the work attitude of employees. Specifically, it was attempted to revise the Job Crafting Scale(JCS) developed by Tims, Bakker and Derks(2012) and develop the scale comprehensively reflecting the construct of job crafting and its factors proposed by Wrzesniewski and Dutton(2001) based on the Job Demands-Resources Model of Schaufeli and Bakker(2004). The validity of the scale developed in the present study was examined with related variables. 56 preliminary questionaries were selected through literature review, and 507 employees participated in the survey. The results of the study were as follows: Firstly, the result of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the structure of the Job Crafting Scale consisted of 5 factors of 44 items, i.e., increasing cognitive job resources, increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources, increasing challenging job demands, and decreasing hindering job demands. Secondly, the convergent and discriminant validity of the Job Crafting Scale were supported. The scale was highly correlated with the JCS(r=.95, p<.001) and proactive personality(r=.74, p<.001), while it had a significantly negative correlation with cynicism(r=-.26, p<.001). Thirdly, the correlation between the Job Crafting Scale developed in the present study and various criteria of work engagement, task performance, and contextual performance were all highly significant, supporting the criterion-related validity of the Job Crafting Scale.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한국 근로시간 44.6... OECD 최고 수준"

      2 김현석, "지각된 사회화 전략 및 주도적 성격과 조직유효성과의 관계에 있어서 주도적 행위(Proactivity)의 매개효과에 관한 연구" 충남대학교 대학원 2007

      3 김영성, "자동차영자동차영업직의 직무열의요인과 역할행동에 관한 연구" 전북대학교 대학원 2013

      4 신강현, "일반직 종사자를 위한 직무 소직 척도(MBI-GS)에 대한 타당화 연구" 한국산업및조직심리학회 16 (16): 1-17, 2003

      5 Dweck, C. S., "성공의 새로운 심리학" 부글북스 1999

      6 유태용, "성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계" 한국산업및조직심리학회 15 (15): 1-24, 2002

      7 Cameron, K. S., "긍정 에너지 경영" 지식 노마드 2009

      8 김병수, "근로시간 세계 1위 한국... 여가 늘리고 생산성 높여야 선진국"

      9 Richardsen, A. M., "Work and health outcomes among police officers: The mediating role of police cynicism and engagement (International)" 13 (13): 555-574, 2006

      10 Greguras, G. S., "Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behavior? A field investigation of mediating role of self-concordance model" 63 (63): 539-560, 2010

      1 "한국 근로시간 44.6... OECD 최고 수준"

      2 김현석, "지각된 사회화 전략 및 주도적 성격과 조직유효성과의 관계에 있어서 주도적 행위(Proactivity)의 매개효과에 관한 연구" 충남대학교 대학원 2007

      3 김영성, "자동차영자동차영업직의 직무열의요인과 역할행동에 관한 연구" 전북대학교 대학원 2013

      4 신강현, "일반직 종사자를 위한 직무 소직 척도(MBI-GS)에 대한 타당화 연구" 한국산업및조직심리학회 16 (16): 1-17, 2003

      5 Dweck, C. S., "성공의 새로운 심리학" 부글북스 1999

      6 유태용, "성격의 5요인과 조직에서의 맥락수행간의 관계" 한국산업및조직심리학회 15 (15): 1-24, 2002

      7 Cameron, K. S., "긍정 에너지 경영" 지식 노마드 2009

      8 김병수, "근로시간 세계 1위 한국... 여가 늘리고 생산성 높여야 선진국"

      9 Richardsen, A. M., "Work and health outcomes among police officers: The mediating role of police cynicism and engagement (International)" 13 (13): 555-574, 2006

      10 Greguras, G. S., "Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behavior? A field investigation of mediating role of self-concordance model" 63 (63): 539-560, 2010

      11 Diener, E., "Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology" Russell Sage Foundation 213-229, 1999

      12 Wrzesniewski, A., "Turn the job you have into the job you want" 88 (88): 114-117, 2010

      13 Bateman, T., S., "The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlate" 14 (14): 103-118, 2006

      14 Slemp, G. R., "The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting" 3 (3): 126-146, 2013

      15 Nielsena, K., "The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers" 26 (26): 365-384, 2013

      16 Schaufeli, W. B., "The Measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmatory factor analytic approach" 3 (3): 71-92, 2002

      17 Ghitulescu, B. E., "Shaping tasks and relationships at work: Examining the antecedents of employee job crafting" University of Pittsburgh 2006

      18 Bakker, A. B., "Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement" 65 (65): 1359-1378, 2012

      19 Sheldon, K., "Positive psychology manifesto"

      20 Borman, W. C., "Personnel selection in organizations" Jossey- Bass 71-98, 1993

      21 Hackman, J. R., "Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory" 16 (16): 250-279, 1976

      22 Steger, M. F., "Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory(WAMI)" 20 (20): 322-337, 2012

      23 Schaufeli, W.,B., "Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual" Consulting Psychologists Press 19-26, 1996

      24 Schaufeli, W. B., "Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multisample study" 25 (25): 293-315, 2004

      25 Demerouti, E., "Drive 드라이브" 청림출판사 2011

      26 Tims, M., "Development and validation of the job crafting scale" 80 (80): 173-186, 2012

      27 Wrzesniewski, A., "Crafting a job: Revisioning employees" 26 (26): 179-201, 2001

      28 예지은, "CEO Information: 대한민국직장인의 행복을 말하다" 삼성경제연구소 1-26, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-04-21 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association of Life-span Studies: KALS -> Association of Life-span Studies: ALS KCI등재후보
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.27 1.27 1.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.48 1.38 2.177 0.41
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼