RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유통산업발전법상 대형마트 영업규제에 관한 연구 = Legal study on the business restriction of large retail discount stores

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613404

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      After the business restrictions of the Distribution Industry Development Act (hereafter referred to as "Act") of 17, January 2012 came into effect, controversy arose over the issue of restricting the business hours of Large retail discount stores and Super Supermarkets(hereafter referred to as ‘Stores’). In January of 2013, amendments were made to the Act to tighten operators’ business hour regulations, and in response Stores, along with their suppliers are preparing to file a constitutional appeal against the amendment. Nevertheless, the National Assembly has initiated amendments to the Act in order to strengthen Stores business hour restrictions and regulations.
      Changes in the Distribution Industry structure and consumption patterns has lead the Small Distributor Industry, consisting primarily of Traditional Markets and Small Merchants, to the verge of collapse. This situation has magnified due to the sudden increase in the number of Stores. Ultimately, this problem expanded into that of social structure instigating the demand for the protection of small merchants and regulations of large enterprises, thus Article 12-2 of the Act restricting business hours of Stores is the product of such demands within the distribution industry.
      Local governments established ordinances and according to the regulations each Mayor authorized restrictive measures regarding business hours and designating mandatory off-days for Stores. Stores filed a revocation litigation based on the illegitimacy of dispositions restricting business hours and as a result of the success of this lawsuit, the attitude towards the regulations were slightly mollified. However, this result does not judge the legality of restricting business hours of Stores. Rather, this adjudication focuses on the discussion of the limitations of ordinance enactment authority through this regards the legality of ordinance and its resulting violation of dispositions, thus there is a need to evaluate the administrative legal issues. In addition, as the issue of the litigation was not an assessment of the system itself, the actual profitability of the discussing the constitutionality of business hour restrictions through the Act is indisputable.
      Comparable to economic regulations, distribution industry regulations are largely affected by the environment in which they are applied. In a societal structure with a majority of self-employed workers, increase of discussions to democratize the economy and in the constitutional court where political bias is inevitable, making a decision on unconstitutionality regarding business hour regulations of the Act cannot be simple. However, considering all parties including Stores, Small Merchants, and consumers, it is necessary to examine what policy can further the competitiveness of the distribution industry.
      번역하기

      After the business restrictions of the Distribution Industry Development Act (hereafter referred to as "Act") of 17, January 2012 came into effect, controversy arose over the issue of restricting the business hours of Large retail discount stores and ...

      After the business restrictions of the Distribution Industry Development Act (hereafter referred to as "Act") of 17, January 2012 came into effect, controversy arose over the issue of restricting the business hours of Large retail discount stores and Super Supermarkets(hereafter referred to as ‘Stores’). In January of 2013, amendments were made to the Act to tighten operators’ business hour regulations, and in response Stores, along with their suppliers are preparing to file a constitutional appeal against the amendment. Nevertheless, the National Assembly has initiated amendments to the Act in order to strengthen Stores business hour restrictions and regulations.
      Changes in the Distribution Industry structure and consumption patterns has lead the Small Distributor Industry, consisting primarily of Traditional Markets and Small Merchants, to the verge of collapse. This situation has magnified due to the sudden increase in the number of Stores. Ultimately, this problem expanded into that of social structure instigating the demand for the protection of small merchants and regulations of large enterprises, thus Article 12-2 of the Act restricting business hours of Stores is the product of such demands within the distribution industry.
      Local governments established ordinances and according to the regulations each Mayor authorized restrictive measures regarding business hours and designating mandatory off-days for Stores. Stores filed a revocation litigation based on the illegitimacy of dispositions restricting business hours and as a result of the success of this lawsuit, the attitude towards the regulations were slightly mollified. However, this result does not judge the legality of restricting business hours of Stores. Rather, this adjudication focuses on the discussion of the limitations of ordinance enactment authority through this regards the legality of ordinance and its resulting violation of dispositions, thus there is a need to evaluate the administrative legal issues. In addition, as the issue of the litigation was not an assessment of the system itself, the actual profitability of the discussing the constitutionality of business hour restrictions through the Act is indisputable.
      Comparable to economic regulations, distribution industry regulations are largely affected by the environment in which they are applied. In a societal structure with a majority of self-employed workers, increase of discussions to democratize the economy and in the constitutional court where political bias is inevitable, making a decision on unconstitutionality regarding business hour regulations of the Act cannot be simple. However, considering all parties including Stores, Small Merchants, and consumers, it is necessary to examine what policy can further the competitiveness of the distribution industry.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한종길, "프랑스의 유통업 출점규제의 성과 및 국내유통정책에 대한 시사점" 한국유통학회 14 (14): 65-82, 2009

      2 강영기, "일본 중소기업분야조정법의 운용실태를 통해 본 분야조정제도에 대한 소고" 한국유통법학회 (창간) : 2014

      3 한상린, "유통원론" 학현사 2014

      4 김천수, "유통산업발전법의 유통업태 분류체계의 문제점 및 개선방안" 법학연구소 17 (17): 245-278, 2014

      5 최영홍, "유통법의 의의와 지도원리" 한국유통법학회 (창간) : 2014

      6 정하명, "유통규제와 지방자치단체 -한국과 미국의 지방자치단체에 의한 대형마트·SSM규제 비교‧분석-" 한국지방자치법학회 14 (14): 469-490, 2014

      7 소상공인진흥원, "외국의 대형소매점 출점규제"

      8 황태희, "소매 유통업에서의 수요지배력 남용행위 규제에 관한 경제법적 연구" 법학연구소 19 (19): 181-206, 2015

      9 강희은, "서울시 소상공인 지원정책과 유통산업발전법 등 관련법령 개선방향" 법제처 2012

      10 최영홍, "딜러계약의 법리" 한국경영법률학회 22 (22): 147-180, 2012

      1 한종길, "프랑스의 유통업 출점규제의 성과 및 국내유통정책에 대한 시사점" 한국유통학회 14 (14): 65-82, 2009

      2 강영기, "일본 중소기업분야조정법의 운용실태를 통해 본 분야조정제도에 대한 소고" 한국유통법학회 (창간) : 2014

      3 한상린, "유통원론" 학현사 2014

      4 김천수, "유통산업발전법의 유통업태 분류체계의 문제점 및 개선방안" 법학연구소 17 (17): 245-278, 2014

      5 최영홍, "유통법의 의의와 지도원리" 한국유통법학회 (창간) : 2014

      6 정하명, "유통규제와 지방자치단체 -한국과 미국의 지방자치단체에 의한 대형마트·SSM규제 비교‧분석-" 한국지방자치법학회 14 (14): 469-490, 2014

      7 소상공인진흥원, "외국의 대형소매점 출점규제"

      8 황태희, "소매 유통업에서의 수요지배력 남용행위 규제에 관한 경제법적 연구" 법학연구소 19 (19): 181-206, 2015

      9 강희은, "서울시 소상공인 지원정책과 유통산업발전법 등 관련법령 개선방향" 법제처 2012

      10 최영홍, "딜러계약의 법리" 한국경영법률학회 22 (22): 147-180, 2012

      11 양만식, "대형점포에 대한 영업규제의 현황과 그 시사점- 일본법을 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 38 (38): 3-48, 2014

      12 최영홍, "대형유통업체와 납품업자가 거래공정화를 위한 제도 개선방안 연구" 공정거래위원회 2007

      13 김천수, "대형마트의 임대점포가 영업규제 대상에서 제외되는지 여부" 한국유통법학회 (창간) : 2014

      14 최봉석, "대형마트와 SSM의 자율규제에 관한 법적 검토" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (36) : 293-318, 2013

      15 최우용, "대형마트와 SSM 영업규제의 문제점과 제도적․정책적 정비방안에 관한 고찰" 한국비교공법학회 13 (13): 217-248, 2012

      16 장교식, "대형마트 영업규제조례에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (48) : 49-73, 2012

      17 백옥선, "대형마트 및 기업형슈퍼마켓 영업일시(營業日時) 규제에 관한 법적 고찰" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (36) : 319-349, 2013

      18 박충렬, "대형마트 및 SSM 영업시간 제한 규제의 문제점과 보안방안" 국회입법조사처 (497) : 2012

      19 최영홍, "대리상의 보상청구권의 유추적용 여부 - 대법원 2013.2.14. 선고 2011다28342 판결에 대한 평석" 한국상사법학회 32 (32): 215-242, 2013

      20 최영홍, "대규모유통업법의 제정과 향후 운용방향" 한국경쟁법학회 25 : 2012

      21 신석훈, "기업형 슈퍼마켓(SSM) 규제 입법논리의 문제점" 한국경제연구원 2009

      22 임영균, "고객지향적 유통관리" 학현사 2014

      23 Richard Vedder, "Wal-Mart, Individual and the State" 39 : 1725-, 2006

      24 Zachary Courser, "Wal-Mart and the Politics of American Retail"

      25 Paulson, Barry W, "Wal-Mart and Contestable Markets in Retailing" 39 : 2006

      26 Sandra Mottner, "Wal-Mart : Supplier performance and market power" 62 (62): 2009

      27 Michael P. Vandenbergh, "The new Wal-Mart effect - The role of private contracting in global goverance" 2007

      28 Freeman, R.E., "The Wal-Mart effect and business, ethics, and society" 20 (20): 2006

      29 Fishman, "The Wal-Mart effect and a decent society - Who knew shopping was so important" 20 (20): 2006

      30 R. Edward Freeman, "The Wal-Mart Effect and Business, Ethics, and Society" 20 (20): 38-, 2006

      31 W.R. Davidson, "The Retailer life Cycle" 1976

      32 Global Insight, "The Economic Impact of Wal-mart"

      33 Emek Basker, "The Causes and Consequences of Wal-Mart’s Growth" 21 (21): 2007

      34 백종인, "SSM규제에 관한 법적 고찰" 동북아법연구소 7 (7): 123-149, 2013

      35 김희곤, "SSM 영업규제조례를 둘러싼 자치입법의 문제점과 과제" 한국토지공법학회 60 : 249-284, 2013

      36 나달숙, "SSM 규제의 법적 쟁점과 공존상생 방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 36 (36): 829-854, 2012

      37 Paul N Bloom, "Retailer power and supplier welfare - The case of Wal-Mart" 77 (77): 2001

      38 Geoge Lefcoe, "Regulation of Superstores -The Legality of Zoning Ordinances Emerging from the Skirmishes between Wal-Mart and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union" 58 : 833-, 2005

      39 Albert A. Foer, "Mr. Magoo Visits Wal-Mart - Finding the Right Lens for Antitrust" 39 : 2006

      40 주 프랑스대사관, "Macron법 하원 논의 관련 동향(2)" 2015

      41 Roger D. Blair, "MONOPSONY in law and Economics" Cambridge University Press 43-, 2010

      42 Jerry hausman, "Consumer benefits from increased competition in shopping outlets - measuring the effect of Wal-Mart" 22 : 2007

      43 William Beaver, "Battling Wal-Mart - How communities can respond" 110 (110): 2005

      44 대한상공회의소, "2015 유통산업백서" 대한상의 유통물류진흥원 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1 1 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼