RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    내부통제시스템의 본질과 내부통제의무 위반에 대한 법적 책임 = The Nature of Internal Control System and Its Liability

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613186

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The need for internal control is currently not a matter of dispute. A more significant question is where ultimate responsibility for internal control should be vested. Internal controls within business entities are also referred to as operational controls. The COSO Report defines internal control as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives” in three categories: “effectiveness and efficiency of operations, reliability of financial reporting, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.”Effective internal control implies the organization generates reliable financial reporting and substantially complies with the laws and regulations that apply to it. However, whether an organization achieves operational and strategic objectives may depend on factors outside the enterprise, such as competition or technological innovation. These factors are outside the scope of internal control; therefore, effective internal control provides only timely information or feedback on progress towards the achievement of operational and strategic objectives, but cannot guarantee their achievement. Internal control system in Korea was recently introduced. But the area is limited only in the accounting control and compliance system, compared to the United States and Japan. And the research of legal liability on the violation of internal control duties is still in a very nascent stage.
    This Article contributes to this ongoing debate on the legal liability in violation of internal control duties, especially (1) a director’s liability for a failure of oversight as opposed to an action taken by the director; (2) a corporate board’s obligation to establish an overall policy for internal controls, including risk management and compliance with laws, and to oversee the formulation and implementation of specific components of such policy; and (3) the relationship with the business judgement rule.
    As a result, the minimum standards of internal control should be established, and also the scope of internal control should be broadened to include effectiveness and efficiency of operations as well as financial reporting and compliance system.
    번역하기

    The need for internal control is currently not a matter of dispute. A more significant question is where ultimate responsibility for internal control should be vested. Internal controls within business entities are also referred to as operational cont...

    The need for internal control is currently not a matter of dispute. A more significant question is where ultimate responsibility for internal control should be vested. Internal controls within business entities are also referred to as operational controls. The COSO Report defines internal control as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives” in three categories: “effectiveness and efficiency of operations, reliability of financial reporting, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.”Effective internal control implies the organization generates reliable financial reporting and substantially complies with the laws and regulations that apply to it. However, whether an organization achieves operational and strategic objectives may depend on factors outside the enterprise, such as competition or technological innovation. These factors are outside the scope of internal control; therefore, effective internal control provides only timely information or feedback on progress towards the achievement of operational and strategic objectives, but cannot guarantee their achievement. Internal control system in Korea was recently introduced. But the area is limited only in the accounting control and compliance system, compared to the United States and Japan. And the research of legal liability on the violation of internal control duties is still in a very nascent stage.
    This Article contributes to this ongoing debate on the legal liability in violation of internal control duties, especially (1) a director’s liability for a failure of oversight as opposed to an action taken by the director; (2) a corporate board’s obligation to establish an overall policy for internal controls, including risk management and compliance with laws, and to oversee the formulation and implementation of specific components of such policy; and (3) the relationship with the business judgement rule.
    As a result, the minimum standards of internal control should be established, and also the scope of internal control should be broadened to include effectiveness and efficiency of operations as well as financial reporting and compliance system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이철송, "회사법강의(제15판)" 박영사 2008

    2 정대, "일본의 신회사법상의 주식회사의 내부통제시스템에 관한 연구" 2006

    3 양만식, "이사의 내부통제시스템의 구축책임과 현상에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 25 (25): 249-272, 2011

    4 김화진, "상장기업 이사의 책임완화론-내부통제시스템을 통한 이사의 책임완화 방안-" 2003

    5 정동윤, "상법(제3판)" 법문사 2008

    6 최수정, "미국 판례법상 이사의 감시의무에 관한 연구-비즈니스 리스크를 중심으로-" 한양대학교 27 (27): 215-237, 2010

    7 서완석, "내부통제와 준법감시인제도" 한국기업법학회 23 (23): 289-330, 2009

    8 권종호, "기업내부통제제도의 바람직한 입법방향" 한국기업법학회 25 (25): 127-154, 2011

    9 김태진, "개정 상법하의 집행임원제 운용을 위한 법적 검토" 한국상사법학회 30 (30): 295-384, 2011

    10 森實, "現代監査論" 白挑書房 1989

    1 이철송, "회사법강의(제15판)" 박영사 2008

    2 정대, "일본의 신회사법상의 주식회사의 내부통제시스템에 관한 연구" 2006

    3 양만식, "이사의 내부통제시스템의 구축책임과 현상에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 25 (25): 249-272, 2011

    4 김화진, "상장기업 이사의 책임완화론-내부통제시스템을 통한 이사의 책임완화 방안-" 2003

    5 정동윤, "상법(제3판)" 법문사 2008

    6 최수정, "미국 판례법상 이사의 감시의무에 관한 연구-비즈니스 리스크를 중심으로-" 한양대학교 27 (27): 215-237, 2010

    7 서완석, "내부통제와 준법감시인제도" 한국기업법학회 23 (23): 289-330, 2009

    8 권종호, "기업내부통제제도의 바람직한 입법방향" 한국기업법학회 25 (25): 127-154, 2011

    9 김태진, "개정 상법하의 집행임원제 운용을 위한 법적 검토" 한국상사법학회 30 (30): 295-384, 2011

    10 森實, "現代監査論" 白挑書房 1989

    11 北沢義博, "内部統制システム構築の法的義務と役員の責任" (2) : 2006

    12 鳥羽至英, "內部統制統合的の枠組み(理論篇" 白挑書房

    13 鳥飼重和, "內部統制時代の役員責任" 商事法務 2008

    14 小西一正, "內部統制の理論" 中央経済社 1996

    15 神田秀樹, "会社法入門" 岩波書店 2006

    16 蟹江, "会社法におけるコーポレートガバナンスと監査" 同文舘 2008

    17 松岡弘樹, "会社法と内部統制システム" (15) : 2009

    18 千代田邦夫, "アメリカ監査論 (第2版)" 中央経済社 1998

    19 千代田邦夫, "アメリカ監査論" 中央経済社 1994

    20 小森清久, "アメリカ內部統制論" 白挑書房 2008

    21 Arthur R. Pinto, "Understanding Corporate Law 130,2d ed" 2004

    22 Michael E. Bleier, "The federal reserve board's new rating system for bank holding companies and financial holding companies" 296-299, 2007

    23 Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The board of directors and internal control, 19 Cardozo L. Rev. 237"

    24 Lyman P.Q. Johnson, "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Fiduciary Duties, 30 Wm" 1149 (1149): 2004

    25 Byrne, G. R., "The Independent Auditor and Internal Control" 1957

    26 AICPA, "The Commission on Auditor’s Responsibilities, Report, Conclusions and Recommendations" 1978

    27 AICPA, "Scope of the Independent Auditor's Review of Internal Control" 29 : 1958

    28 SEC Commissioner Cynthia A. Glassman, "SEC Initiatives Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Before the College of Business and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, California"

    29 Dan Shaughnessy, "Reversing the Curse: Inside the 2004 Boston Red Sox 2,23"

    30 U.S. General Accouting Office, "Report to the Congress: Impact of Foreign Corrupt Practices Acton U.S. Business" 1981

    31 "Proposed Rules on Report of Management’s Responsibilities, Securities Act Release No. 6789, 41 SEC Doc. (CCH) 589"

    32 "National commission on fraudulent financial reporting of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting"

    33 Committee on Law and Accounting, "Management” Reports on Internal Control: A Legal Perpective" 889 (889): 1994

    34 Thuy-Nga T., "Lifting the curse of the SOX through emploee assessments of the internal control environment, 56" 1 (1): 2007

    35 Levy, S., "Iternal Control and Regal Responsibility" 1957

    36 Committee on Auditing Procedure, "Internal Control--Elements Of a Coordinated System and Its Importance to Management and the Independent Public Accountant 5, 6"

    37 AIA, "Extensions of Auditing Procedure" 1939

    38 AIA, "Examination of Financial Statement by Independent Public Accountants"

    39 David Thigpen, "Every Year, a Miracle, Time"

    40 Office of the Chief Accountant, "Div. of Corp. Fin., U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, Staff Statement on Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 3" 2005

    41 Lawrence A. Cunningham, "Cunningham, The appeal and limits of internal controls to fight fraud, terrorism, other ills, 29" 267 (267): 2004

    42 Lawrence A, "Cunningham, Compilation, The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America" 1 (1): 1997

    43 Mautz, R. K., "Criteria for Management Control Systems-The Effectiveness of Internal Control"

    44 Eric A. Chiappinelli, "Chiappinelli, Cases and Materials on Business Entities"

    45 Letter from Robert L. May, "Chairman, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, In Assistant Comptroller General, General Accounting Office"

    46 Robert W. Hamilton, "Cases and Materials on Corporations Including Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies"

    47 Montgomery R. H., "Auditing Theory and Practice"

    48 Geer, G. P., "Analysisof the Science of Accounts, In Yushoudo American Historic Accounting Literature" 25 : 1882

    49 Editorial, "An 88-Year Wait, Ended, Wash. Times"

    50 김형기, "1997-1998년 한국경제의 위기와 경제개혁: 평가와 정책과제" 한국경제발전학회 11 (11): 51-77, 2005

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼