RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      리커트 척도 개발을 위한 탐색적 요인분석의 사용 = Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis for the Development of the Likert-type Scale

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104696582

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a widely used analytical tool for development of psychological scales. Although guidelines for proper use of EFA have been proposed by many experts, special considerations for the item level factor analysis have been less emphasized. The current study highlighted that certain features of Likert-type items, such as low reliability and different levels of skewness, should be considered in EFA for scale development. The author suggested that a more than 5-point response scale is required for the common practice of EFA for the Likert-type scale development and, if not applicable, extraction of polychoric correlations is desirable, rather than Pearson correlations. Great emphasis has been placed on the use of parallel analysis and principle axis factoring or unweighted least squares method on polychoric correlations with oblique rotation. Higher item to factor ratio and larger sample size in comparison with scale level factor analysis are also emphasized. An EFA on the 10 items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was illustrated with the proposed practices using the R statistical program.
      번역하기

      Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a widely used analytical tool for development of psychological scales. Although guidelines for proper use of EFA have been proposed by many experts, special considerations for the item level factor analysis have be...

      Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a widely used analytical tool for development of psychological scales. Although guidelines for proper use of EFA have been proposed by many experts, special considerations for the item level factor analysis have been less emphasized. The current study highlighted that certain features of Likert-type items, such as low reliability and different levels of skewness, should be considered in EFA for scale development. The author suggested that a more than 5-point response scale is required for the common practice of EFA for the Likert-type scale development and, if not applicable, extraction of polychoric correlations is desirable, rather than Pearson correlations. Great emphasis has been placed on the use of parallel analysis and principle axis factoring or unweighted least squares method on polychoric correlations with oblique rotation. Higher item to factor ratio and larger sample size in comparison with scale level factor analysis are also emphasized. An EFA on the 10 items of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was illustrated with the proposed practices using the R statistical program.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이순묵, "요인분석 I" 학지사 1995

      2 Rhemtulla, M, "When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions" 17 (17): 354-373, 2012

      3 Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics" Allyn & Bacon 2007

      4 Owens, T. J., "Two dimensions of self-esteem : Reciprocal effects of positive self worth and negative self-esteem on adolescent problems" 59 : 391-407, 1994

      5 Rosenberg, M., "Society and the adolescent self-image" Princeton University Press 1965

      6 DeVellis, R. F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" Sage 2003

      7 Worthington, R. L., "Scale development research : A content analysis and recommendations for best practices" 34 (34): 806-838, 2006

      8 MacCallum, R. C., "Sample size in factor analysis" 4 (4): 84-99, 1999

      9 O’Connor, B. P., "SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test" 32 : 396-402, 2000

      10 Buja, A., "Remarks on parallel analysis" 27 (27): 509-540, 1992

      1 이순묵, "요인분석 I" 학지사 1995

      2 Rhemtulla, M, "When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions" 17 (17): 354-373, 2012

      3 Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics" Allyn & Bacon 2007

      4 Owens, T. J., "Two dimensions of self-esteem : Reciprocal effects of positive self worth and negative self-esteem on adolescent problems" 59 : 391-407, 1994

      5 Rosenberg, M., "Society and the adolescent self-image" Princeton University Press 1965

      6 DeVellis, R. F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" Sage 2003

      7 Worthington, R. L., "Scale development research : A content analysis and recommendations for best practices" 34 (34): 806-838, 2006

      8 MacCallum, R. C., "Sample size in factor analysis" 4 (4): 84-99, 1999

      9 O’Connor, B. P., "SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test" 32 : 396-402, 2000

      10 Buja, A., "Remarks on parallel analysis" 27 (27): 509-540, 1992

      11 Briggs, N. E., "Recovery of week common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation" 38 (38): 25-56, 2003

      12 Furr, R. M., "Psychometrics : An Introduction" Sage Publications 2014

      13 Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" McGraw-Hill 1994

      14 Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" Guilford Press 2011

      15 Humphreys, L. G., "Note on a criterion for the number of common factors" Springer Nature 29 : 571-578, 1969

      16 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" Prentice Hall 2010

      17 Harman, H. H., "Modern factor analysis" Chicago University Press 1976

      18 Olsson U., "Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient" 44 (44): 443-460, 1979

      19 Loehlin, J. C., "Latent variable models" Lawrence Erlbaum 2004

      20 Embretson, S. E., "Item response theory for psychologist" Lawrence Erlbaum 2000

      21 Maydeu-Olivares, A., "Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data" 45 : 935-974, 2010

      22 Wirth, R. J., "Item factor analysis : Current approaches and future directions" 12 (12): 58-79, 2007

      23 Allen, M. J., "Introduction to measurement theory" Waveland Press 1979

      24 Supple, A. J., "Factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale" 44 (44): 748-764, 2012

      25 Forero, C. G., "Factor analysis with ordinal indicators : A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation" 16 : 625-641, 2009

      26 Dolan, C. V., "Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5, and 7 response categories : A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data" 47 : 309-326, 1994

      27 Floyd, J. F., "Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments" 7 (7): 286-299, 1995

      28 Reise, S. P., "Factor analysis and scale revision" 12 : 287-297, 2000

      29 McDonald, R. P., "Factor analysis and related methods" Lawrence Erlbaum 1985

      30 Gorsuch, R. L., "Factor analysis" Lawrence Erlbaum 1983

      31 Gorsuch, R. L., "Exploratory factor analysis : Its role in item Analysis" 68 (68): 532-560, 1997

      32 Fabrigar, L. R., "Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research" 4 (4): 272-299, 1999

      33 Timmerman, M. E., "Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis" 16 (16): 209-220, 2011

      34 Zwick, W. R., "Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain" 99 (99): 432-442, 1986

      35 Johnson, R. A., "Applied multivariate statistical analysis" Prentice Hall 2002

      36 Cohen, J., "Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum 2003

      37 Lattin, J., "Analyzing multivariate data" Cengage Learning 2002

      38 Stark, S., "An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimentional pairwise-preference Model" 29 (29): 184-203, 2005

      39 Horn, J. L., "A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis" 30 : 179-185, 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-03-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회지 임상 -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
      2016-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
      2014-04-10 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Clinical Psychology Association KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회 산하 임상심리학회 -> 한국임상심리학회 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.36 1.36 1.6
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.69 1.77 2.966 0.3
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼