RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      남북한가족법의 변천과 남북통일 후 가족법의 미래상 = Changes in Family Law in South and North Korea and Future Prospects for Family Law Post-Reunification

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101430207

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is an extension of a keynote paper titled “The Impact of Division and Unification on Family Law: Implications from the Experiences of East Asia’s Divided Countries.” It was originally presented August 22 at the 2015 International Conference on the Present and Future of Family Law in South and North Korea: A 70-Year Division, hosted by the Korean Society of Family Law. The paper provides an overview of the development process of family law in South and North Korea since the liberation of the peninsula; explores the elements of North Korea’s family law that should remain in effect, at least temporarily, after the reunification of South and
      North Korea; and examines whether there are elements of North Korea’s family law that should be embraced in post-reunification consolidated family law. This paper is composed of as follows; The basic order of liberal democracy must be the cornerstone for family law in a unified Korea. This principle squarely contradicts the
      legal order of family law founded on North Korea’s socialist system. Nonetheless, the understanding of family relations established among North Koreans should not be changed unilaterally. It may be necessary to acknowledge the provisional and transitional effects of family law or inheritance law until the unification of laws has been completed. Even after the completion of the process of unifying family law, however, it is assumed that the estrangement between people of South and North Korea in terms of consciousness, understanding,
      modes of living and legal practices with respect to various institutions under family law will not easily be resolved, owing to the length of the division of nations. The issue of resolving these divisions will remain even after the consolidation of family law. It may be difficult to declare that unification or consolidation has
      actually been achieved as long as the problem remains unaddressed.
      번역하기

      This paper is an extension of a keynote paper titled “The Impact of Division and Unification on Family Law: Implications from the Experiences of East Asia’s Divided Countries.” It was originally presented August 22 at the 2015 International Conf...

      This paper is an extension of a keynote paper titled “The Impact of Division and Unification on Family Law: Implications from the Experiences of East Asia’s Divided Countries.” It was originally presented August 22 at the 2015 International Conference on the Present and Future of Family Law in South and North Korea: A 70-Year Division, hosted by the Korean Society of Family Law. The paper provides an overview of the development process of family law in South and North Korea since the liberation of the peninsula; explores the elements of North Korea’s family law that should remain in effect, at least temporarily, after the reunification of South and
      North Korea; and examines whether there are elements of North Korea’s family law that should be embraced in post-reunification consolidated family law. This paper is composed of as follows; The basic order of liberal democracy must be the cornerstone for family law in a unified Korea. This principle squarely contradicts the
      legal order of family law founded on North Korea’s socialist system. Nonetheless, the understanding of family relations established among North Koreans should not be changed unilaterally. It may be necessary to acknowledge the provisional and transitional effects of family law or inheritance law until the unification of laws has been completed. Even after the completion of the process of unifying family law, however, it is assumed that the estrangement between people of South and North Korea in terms of consciousness, understanding,
      modes of living and legal practices with respect to various institutions under family law will not easily be resolved, owing to the length of the division of nations. The issue of resolving these divisions will remain even after the consolidation of family law. It may be difficult to declare that unification or consolidation has
      actually been achieved as long as the problem remains unaddressed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 남북한가족법의 변천
      • Ⅲ. 총일 후 가족법의 미래상
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 남북한가족법의 변천
      • Ⅲ. 총일 후 가족법의 미래상
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박복순, "통일대비 남북한 가족관련 법제비교 및 통합의 기본방향" 통일법무과 (21) : 2015

      2 신영호, "통일단계에서의 민법 친족·상속편의 북한주민 적용방안에 관한 연구" 통일법무과 (8) : 2011

      3 홍창우, "통일과 사법[1]" 법원행정처 2011

      4 김영규, "최근 남북한 가족법의 변모와 그 접근가능성" 법학연구소 20 : 21-55, 2008

      5 석광현, "주해친족법 제1권과 제2권" 박영사 2015

      6 문철만, "조선사회과학학술집 415 법학연구론문집 22" 사회과학출판사 2010

      7 리송녀, "조선사회과학학술집 373" 사회과학출판사 2013

      8 홍극표, "조선민주주의인민공화국 법제정사" 과학백과사전출판사 1986

      9 조일호, "조선 가족법" 교육 도서 출판사 1958

      10 신영호, "북한주민에 대한 한국민사법의 적용" 한국법학원 (121) : 2010

      1 박복순, "통일대비 남북한 가족관련 법제비교 및 통합의 기본방향" 통일법무과 (21) : 2015

      2 신영호, "통일단계에서의 민법 친족·상속편의 북한주민 적용방안에 관한 연구" 통일법무과 (8) : 2011

      3 홍창우, "통일과 사법[1]" 법원행정처 2011

      4 김영규, "최근 남북한 가족법의 변모와 그 접근가능성" 법학연구소 20 : 21-55, 2008

      5 석광현, "주해친족법 제1권과 제2권" 박영사 2015

      6 문철만, "조선사회과학학술집 415 법학연구론문집 22" 사회과학출판사 2010

      7 리송녀, "조선사회과학학술집 373" 사회과학출판사 2013

      8 홍극표, "조선민주주의인민공화국 법제정사" 과학백과사전출판사 1986

      9 조일호, "조선 가족법" 교육 도서 출판사 1958

      10 신영호, "북한주민에 대한 한국민사법의 적용" 한국법학원 (121) : 2010

      11 "북한의 가족법"

      12 "북한법의 체계적 고찰(I)-민사관계법-" 법무부 1992

      13 리송녀, "법학연구론문집 3 조선사회과학학술집 97" 사회과학출판사 2010

      14 "민사법사전" 사회안전부출판사 1997

      15 신영호, "로스쿨 가족법강의" 세창출판사 2013

      16 권순한, "남북한가족법의 통합과 법률문제" 7 (7): 2000

      17 신영호, "남북 주민 사이의 가족관계 및 상속관련의 당면문제와 특례법의 제정방안" 2010

      18 崔達坤, "北韓法入門" 세창출판사 1998

      19 申榮鎬, "北韓法 體系와 特色" 세종연구소 1994

      20 崔達坤, "北韓 家族法 40年과 그 動向" 高麗大學校 法學硏究所 8 : 1990

      21 "北韓 家族政策의 變化" 民族統一硏究院 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-06-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
      2005-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.87 0.87 0.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.77 0.758 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼