RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대학 창업교육 핵심 성공요인: 미국 대학 사례의 시사점 = The Key Success Factors of University Entrepreneurship Education: Implication from USA University Cases

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101195114

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Entrepreneurship courses and programs in Korean universities tend to increase steadily but seem to have some limitations. They are usually recognized as another domain of Business Administration. Entrepreneurship program is practical like Business Administration but should be much more interdisciplinary than that. Because Korean Entrepreneurship programs are in the early stage, they must be reinforced with factors such as education culture, faculties, curriculum and relationships with communities. This study aims to get some implications from Entrepreneurship programs have been run by universities in America in order to facilitate Entrepreneurship program in Korean universities. Based on 11 success factors found by our case universities' Entrepreneurship programs and Kauffman Campus, this study has drawn implications of critical success factors of Entrepreneurship programs as follow. First of all, because Entrepreneurship programs should focus on Entrepreneurship mind sets such as innovative idea generation and courage to overcome risk, it is more desirable that Entrepreneurship programs are introduced in all departments of universities such as Arts, Science and Engineering. These programs also need to take interdisciplinary approach and required to be opened from liberal arts course. In order to be sustained during all their academic careers, vision, mission and strategy for Entrepreneurship programs should be based on strong leadership and support of top leaders. Entrepreneurship culture of each university is also one of the most important success factors. Entrepreneurship programs not only as major programs but also as specific Entrepreneurship minors designed for departments such as Arts, Science and Engineering could be considered according to each university's situation. This study also suggest to make a motivation system for Entrepreneurship faculties, Ph d. programs for Entrepreneurship, communication network for Entrepreneurship programs and mentor system in community. To begin Entrepreneurship programs, it also needs to develop good education contents as many as possible. When it concerned with teaching method, project based 4 year program can be suggested to be effective and efficient. To introduce project based program that should be consistent till participants' graduation, university must prepare regulations to support team teaching, mentor and interdisciplinary cooperation. To dissipate the concept that Entrepreneurship is another version of management, this study support the idea that Entrepreneurship programs should be designed and run by independent and central-focused governance system, Entrepreneurship education center.
    번역하기

    Entrepreneurship courses and programs in Korean universities tend to increase steadily but seem to have some limitations. They are usually recognized as another domain of Business Administration. Entrepreneurship program is practical like Business Adm...

    Entrepreneurship courses and programs in Korean universities tend to increase steadily but seem to have some limitations. They are usually recognized as another domain of Business Administration. Entrepreneurship program is practical like Business Administration but should be much more interdisciplinary than that. Because Korean Entrepreneurship programs are in the early stage, they must be reinforced with factors such as education culture, faculties, curriculum and relationships with communities. This study aims to get some implications from Entrepreneurship programs have been run by universities in America in order to facilitate Entrepreneurship program in Korean universities. Based on 11 success factors found by our case universities' Entrepreneurship programs and Kauffman Campus, this study has drawn implications of critical success factors of Entrepreneurship programs as follow. First of all, because Entrepreneurship programs should focus on Entrepreneurship mind sets such as innovative idea generation and courage to overcome risk, it is more desirable that Entrepreneurship programs are introduced in all departments of universities such as Arts, Science and Engineering. These programs also need to take interdisciplinary approach and required to be opened from liberal arts course. In order to be sustained during all their academic careers, vision, mission and strategy for Entrepreneurship programs should be based on strong leadership and support of top leaders. Entrepreneurship culture of each university is also one of the most important success factors. Entrepreneurship programs not only as major programs but also as specific Entrepreneurship minors designed for departments such as Arts, Science and Engineering could be considered according to each university's situation. This study also suggest to make a motivation system for Entrepreneurship faculties, Ph d. programs for Entrepreneurship, communication network for Entrepreneurship programs and mentor system in community. To begin Entrepreneurship programs, it also needs to develop good education contents as many as possible. When it concerned with teaching method, project based 4 year program can be suggested to be effective and efficient. To introduce project based program that should be consistent till participants' graduation, university must prepare regulations to support team teaching, mentor and interdisciplinary cooperation. To dissipate the concept that Entrepreneurship is another version of management, this study support the idea that Entrepreneurship programs should be designed and run by independent and central-focused governance system, Entrepreneurship education center.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최종인, "창업교육센터의 향후 방향에 관한 연구 : 카우프만 캠퍼스 사업의 시사점을 중심으로" 한국벤처창업학회 8 (8): 89-97, 2013

    2 최종인, "융합기반의 대학원 기술창업 교육모델 개발에 대한 탐색적 연구 -" 한국벤처창업학회 8 (8): 119-128, 2013

    3 최종인, "실천중심의 기술경영 교육: 대전 테크노파크의 기술사업화 교육사례를 중심으로" 한국산업경제학회 21 (21): 1455-1478, 2008

    4 양영석, "‘질 좋은’ 창업의 개념정립과 창업교육 중심의 ‘질 좋은’ 창업육성시스템 구축방안 연구" 한국벤처창업학회 7 (7): 141-150, 2012

    5 University of Houston, "University of Houston(2013), WOLFF Center, Retrieved from"

    6 Consortium for Entrepreneurship Education, "Think Like An Entrepreneur"

    7 Choi, J. I., "The model of measures to increase professor and researcher's startups" 2 : 85-98, 2013

    8 Choi, Jong-in, "The Development of Roadmap for Entrepreneurship Eduction in University" Korea Research Foundation 2013

    9 Clifton, J., "The Coming Jobs War" Gallup Press 2011

    10 NC State University, "TEC"

    1 최종인, "창업교육센터의 향후 방향에 관한 연구 : 카우프만 캠퍼스 사업의 시사점을 중심으로" 한국벤처창업학회 8 (8): 89-97, 2013

    2 최종인, "융합기반의 대학원 기술창업 교육모델 개발에 대한 탐색적 연구 -" 한국벤처창업학회 8 (8): 119-128, 2013

    3 최종인, "실천중심의 기술경영 교육: 대전 테크노파크의 기술사업화 교육사례를 중심으로" 한국산업경제학회 21 (21): 1455-1478, 2008

    4 양영석, "‘질 좋은’ 창업의 개념정립과 창업교육 중심의 ‘질 좋은’ 창업육성시스템 구축방안 연구" 한국벤처창업학회 7 (7): 141-150, 2012

    5 University of Houston, "University of Houston(2013), WOLFF Center, Retrieved from"

    6 Consortium for Entrepreneurship Education, "Think Like An Entrepreneur"

    7 Choi, J. I., "The model of measures to increase professor and researcher's startups" 2 : 85-98, 2013

    8 Choi, Jong-in, "The Development of Roadmap for Entrepreneurship Eduction in University" Korea Research Foundation 2013

    9 Clifton, J., "The Coming Jobs War" Gallup Press 2011

    10 NC State University, "TEC"

    11 Washington University in St. Louis, "Skandalaris Center"

    12 USC, "Retrieved from http : //www. marshall. usc"

    13 CEE, "National Content Standards for Entrepreneurship Education"

    14 Lehigh University, "Integrated Product Development"

    15 Maryann, F., "Innovation and Entrepreneurship at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Background and Sample of Current Activitie" University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 8-, 2009

    16 Wakeforest University, "Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise"

    17 Kauffman Foundation, "Entrepreneurship Education Comes of Age on Campus: The challenges and rewards of bringing entrepreneurship to higher education" Kauffman Foundation

    18 Babson College, "Entrepreneurship Curriculum"

    19 DCEA, "Entrepreneurs in High School"

    20 Baylor University, "ETP"

    21 Wakeforest University, "Definition of entrepreneurship"

    22 TEC, "Curriculum"

    23 Burg, E. Van., "Creating university spin-offs : A science-based design perspective" 25 : 114-128, 2008

    24 University of Illinois, "CEM"

    25 Barr, S. H., "Bridging the Valley of Death : Lessons learned from 14 Years of commercialization of Technology Education" 8 (8): 370-388, 2009

    26 Mendes, A., "Academic Entrepreneurship: Possibilities and pitfalls: An Integrated Summary of Studies Conducted by the Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership" University of Illinois at Urbana 2007

    27 Pena, V., "A Survey of Entrepreneurship Education Initiatives(IDA Document NS D-4091), Alexandria" IDA(Institute for Defense Analysis) 2011

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.21 1.21 1.16
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.15 1.12 1.187 0.36
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼