RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    적격심사낙찰제 계약에서 회계정보의 유용성에 관한 연구 = The Effectiveness of Accounting Information in Military Construction Contracts under the Qualification Assessment System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101101587

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper re-evaluated the research on the accounting information's effectiveness in military construction contracts, questioning the former research results on the central army's construction contract that was under the Qualification Assessment System, especially concerning the relations between the accounting information and the bidding ratios as well as the relations between the bidding rates and the defect rates, which targeted between 1 to 10 billions civil engineering, construction, electricity, telecommunication, and environment work types. Unlike the previous results, the relationship between the accounting information and the bidding rates was shown to be considerably limited that the bidding ratio could not be identified through the accounting information, while it could discern the relations with the defect rates. Furthermore, the proven results did not support the hypothesis that the differences in bidding rates could affect the defect ratio. However, through the prediction model of bidding and defect ratios, we could identity the accounting variables that influenced the ratios. Additionally through the results regarding the non-financial indexes in the Pre-Qualification items, the weight on these indexes could be adjusted. In conclusion, the research results has given us new understanding of the problems in the Qualification Assessment System which accounts for the majority of the current military construction contracts and provide validity on the government's expanded implementation of the Lowest Price Award System.
    번역하기

    This paper re-evaluated the research on the accounting information's effectiveness in military construction contracts, questioning the former research results on the central army's construction contract that was under the Qualification Assessment Syst...

    This paper re-evaluated the research on the accounting information's effectiveness in military construction contracts, questioning the former research results on the central army's construction contract that was under the Qualification Assessment System, especially concerning the relations between the accounting information and the bidding ratios as well as the relations between the bidding rates and the defect rates, which targeted between 1 to 10 billions civil engineering, construction, electricity, telecommunication, and environment work types. Unlike the previous results, the relationship between the accounting information and the bidding rates was shown to be considerably limited that the bidding ratio could not be identified through the accounting information, while it could discern the relations with the defect rates. Furthermore, the proven results did not support the hypothesis that the differences in bidding rates could affect the defect ratio. However, through the prediction model of bidding and defect ratios, we could identity the accounting variables that influenced the ratios. Additionally through the results regarding the non-financial indexes in the Pre-Qualification items, the weight on these indexes could be adjusted. In conclusion, the research results has given us new understanding of the problems in the Qualification Assessment System which accounts for the majority of the current military construction contracts and provide validity on the government's expanded implementation of the Lowest Price Award System.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 대한건설협회, 2002

    2 윤성진, "현행 건설공사 낙찰자 선정제도에서 비가격평가요소의 개선방안" 서울대 행정대학원 2002

    3 이상호, "최저가낙찰제의 도입 및 정착방안연구" 한국건설산업연구원 2000

    4 이석제, "정부공사계약에서 회계정보의 유용 성에 관한 연구" 경희대 대학원 2002

    5 정기영, "입찰․계약․클레임론" C&R 연 구소 2002

    6 건교부, "부실공사 방지 대책 설문조사 결과"

    7 "군시설공사적격심사기준"

    8 "군시설공사입찰참가자격사전심사 세부운영 기준"

    9 "국가계약관계법령"

    10 "공사행정업무실무지침서" 국방부 2009

    1 대한건설협회, 2002

    2 윤성진, "현행 건설공사 낙찰자 선정제도에서 비가격평가요소의 개선방안" 서울대 행정대학원 2002

    3 이상호, "최저가낙찰제의 도입 및 정착방안연구" 한국건설산업연구원 2000

    4 이석제, "정부공사계약에서 회계정보의 유용 성에 관한 연구" 경희대 대학원 2002

    5 정기영, "입찰․계약․클레임론" C&R 연 구소 2002

    6 건교부, "부실공사 방지 대책 설문조사 결과"

    7 "군시설공사적격심사기준"

    8 "군시설공사입찰참가자격사전심사 세부운영 기준"

    9 "국가계약관계법령"

    10 "공사행정업무실무지침서" 국방부 2009

    11 국토연구원, "공사수행능력 평가체계 개선에 관한 연구" 2004

    12 장영광, "경영분석" 무역경영사 2002

    13 최민수, "건설공사의 품질향상을 위한 새로운 구상" (가을) : 1998

    14 Charles A. Holt, Jr, "Uncertainty and the Bidding for Incentive Contracts" 69 : 1979

    15 James C. Cox, "Paula-Ann Cech and David Conn, Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Procurement Contracting" 17 : 1996

    16 유진근, "PQ 및 적격심사기준의 문제점과 개선 방안" 한국건설산업연구원 2001

    17 Porter, Robert H, "Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions" 101 (101): 1993

    18 J. S. Russell, "Constructor Prequalification, ASCE Press, Auctions and bidding" 25 (25): 1996

    19 Bajari Patrick, "Comparing Competition and Collusion in Sealed Bid Procurement Auctions : A Numerical Approach" Stanford University 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2012-04-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼