토론을 강조한 MBL실험수업에서 리더 유형에 따른 언어적 상호작용 특성 = Characteristics of Verbal Interactions According to the Leader Style in MBL Experiment Class in Which Discussion was Emphasized

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was performed for 7th grade students to analyze by leader style, the verbal interactions between students in a small group in an MBL(Microcomputer-Based Laboratory) experiment class. The study was performed after arranging the students into four kinds of groups, including groups with leaders of inclusive, persuasive, and alienating styles and a group with no clear leader. The analysis of total frequencies of verbal interaction revealed that the group with an inclusive leader showed the highest frequency of verbal interaction, followed by the group with a persuasive leader, an alienating leader and lastly, the group with no clear leader. The group with an inclusive leader showed the highest frequency of interaction from a cognitive aspect related to question(Q), response(R), making suggestion(MS), and receiving opinions(RO), while interactions from an affective aspect related to behavioral participation(BP) and students' attitudes(SA) were observed more often in a group including an alienating leader than in any other group. An analysis of characteristics of verbal interaction according to leader style showed that a group with an inclusive leader had a permissive atmosphere. It also showed that all members of the group actively participated in discussion and they had a sense of belonging and self-pride with their group. In a group with a persuasive leader, the leader took the lead of most experimental and discussion activities and he was rarely challenged by other students in the group. Rather, other group members showed a tendency to depend on their leader. In a group with an alienating leader, the relationship between leader and members of the group was not harmonious and unfiltered expressions of dissatisfaction and ignorance often took place. The leader's lack of concern about members' low achievement became an obstacle in active discussion. In a group with no clear leader, most interactions during discussion were short and simple. Many answers to the question given by their members were not clear and the interactions were sometimes interrupted for a short while.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실험에서 언어적 상호작용 의 변화와 특성." 2005

2 "변인통제에 관한 과학 수업에서 학생들의 동기 수준에 따른 언어적 상호작용의 분석." 2001

3 "Thinking Science 활동에서 학습자의 인성과 인지수준에 따른 상호작용의 특성." 2006

4 "The school science laboratory: History perspectives and context for contemporary teaching." Kluwer Academic Publisher 249-262, 1998

5 "Student-student negotiation" 1999.

6 "NEO청소년 성격검사 문항 자료집" 한국가이던스 2005

7 "MBL 실험 수업의 소집단 활동에서 나타난 학생들의 언어적 상호작용 특성." 2006

8 "J. S. J. of Research in Science Teaching" 1140-1168, 1993

9 "David. American Journal of Physics" 858-866, 1990

10 "A. B. Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel" 1990.