RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    기업의 사회적 책임활동과 재무분석가 이익예측치 정확성과의 관계

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100857047

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to examine how Corporate Social Responsibilities (hereafter ‘CSR’) affect the analysts`` forecast accuracy. A coherent definition of CSR may be hardly found in prior studies. Generally, CSR is defined as firms`` contribution to the public goods like ethical obligations while incorporating the stakeholders`` perspectives (Clarkson 1995; Paine 2002; Dahlsrud 2006). So we can expect that firms with higher CSR performance (hereafter ‘High-CSR firms’) are more responsible, moral and ethical than firms with lower degree of CSR performance (hereafter ‘Low-CSR firms’). Moreover, high-CSR firms are more prone to disclose neutral-based earnings, which reflect firms`` fundamental status and various interests. Consequently, we can surmise that earnings of High-CSR firms are more predictable than Low-CSR firms. In terms of analysts`` forecast properties, Duru and Reeb (2002) suggest that the analysts`` forecasts are more accurate as earnings predictability increases. Therefore we can anticipate that firms`` level of CSR performance might associate with analysts`` forecast accuracy. In this paper, firms`` performance of CSR is measured by KEJI (Korea Economic Justice Institute) index which is similar with the U.S. CEP (Council Economic Priorities) index. In Korea, since 1991, Korea Economic Justice Institute, which is an independent organization, has annually evaluated social contributions or activities particularly in firms listed in the KOSPI (Korea Composite Stock Price Index) market. To grade firm``s CSR activities, there are seven criteria, including soundness, fairness, community service, satisfaction of customer protection, satisfaction of environment protection, satisfaction of employee protection and contribution of economic development. After evaluating firms based on those criteria, Korea Economic Justice Institute (KEJI) announces top 200 firms in the KOSPI market. Specifically we measure the firms`` CSR performance based on ①KEJI scores if firms`` KEJI index are announced, or ②whether a firm discloses KEJI scores or not. With 144,536 analysts`` forecasts in Fn-Guide database from 2004 to 2010, we found that ①as KEJI scores increases, analysts`` forecasts are more accurate, ②analysts`` forecasts to firms which are announced KEJI index in KOSPI market are more accurate than anaalysts`` forecasts to firms which did not announce KEJI index. Also, analysts`` forecasts for firms which have announced their KEJI index for two-to-three consecutive years are more accurate than other firms. Based on these results, we suggest that firms`` CSR activities have association with accuracy of analysts`` earnings forecasts. This study contributes to the literature by providing the relation between CSR and analysts`` forecast accuracy
    번역하기

    This paper aims to examine how Corporate Social Responsibilities (hereafter ‘CSR’) affect the analysts`` forecast accuracy. A coherent definition of CSR may be hardly found in prior studies. Generally, CSR is defined as firms`` contribution to the...

    This paper aims to examine how Corporate Social Responsibilities (hereafter ‘CSR’) affect the analysts`` forecast accuracy. A coherent definition of CSR may be hardly found in prior studies. Generally, CSR is defined as firms`` contribution to the public goods like ethical obligations while incorporating the stakeholders`` perspectives (Clarkson 1995; Paine 2002; Dahlsrud 2006). So we can expect that firms with higher CSR performance (hereafter ‘High-CSR firms’) are more responsible, moral and ethical than firms with lower degree of CSR performance (hereafter ‘Low-CSR firms’). Moreover, high-CSR firms are more prone to disclose neutral-based earnings, which reflect firms`` fundamental status and various interests. Consequently, we can surmise that earnings of High-CSR firms are more predictable than Low-CSR firms. In terms of analysts`` forecast properties, Duru and Reeb (2002) suggest that the analysts`` forecasts are more accurate as earnings predictability increases. Therefore we can anticipate that firms`` level of CSR performance might associate with analysts`` forecast accuracy. In this paper, firms`` performance of CSR is measured by KEJI (Korea Economic Justice Institute) index which is similar with the U.S. CEP (Council Economic Priorities) index. In Korea, since 1991, Korea Economic Justice Institute, which is an independent organization, has annually evaluated social contributions or activities particularly in firms listed in the KOSPI (Korea Composite Stock Price Index) market. To grade firm``s CSR activities, there are seven criteria, including soundness, fairness, community service, satisfaction of customer protection, satisfaction of environment protection, satisfaction of employee protection and contribution of economic development. After evaluating firms based on those criteria, Korea Economic Justice Institute (KEJI) announces top 200 firms in the KOSPI market. Specifically we measure the firms`` CSR performance based on ①KEJI scores if firms`` KEJI index are announced, or ②whether a firm discloses KEJI scores or not. With 144,536 analysts`` forecasts in Fn-Guide database from 2004 to 2010, we found that ①as KEJI scores increases, analysts`` forecasts are more accurate, ②analysts`` forecasts to firms which are announced KEJI index in KOSPI market are more accurate than anaalysts`` forecasts to firms which did not announce KEJI index. Also, analysts`` forecasts for firms which have announced their KEJI index for two-to-three consecutive years are more accurate than other firms. Based on these results, we suggest that firms`` CSR activities have association with accuracy of analysts`` earnings forecasts. This study contributes to the literature by providing the relation between CSR and analysts`` forecast accuracy

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정석우, "회계이익의 지속성이 재무분석가의 이익예측오차와 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 209-235, 2005

    2 정석우, "환위험 기업에 대한 재무분석가 이익예측 특성" 한국회계학회 37 (37): 1-35, 2012

    3 안윤영, "재무분석가의 특성이 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2006

    4 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    5 고유경, "신규 분석기업에 대한 재무분석가의 이익예측특성" 한국증권학회 39 (39): 419-447, 2010

    6 손성규, "다수 재무분석가에 의한 회계정보 예측의비교" 20 (20): 73-106, 1995

    7 이윤원, "기업특성과 재무분석가 예측정보의 정확성" 17 : 90-108, 1993

    8 고성천, "기업의 사회적 책임활동(CSR) 결정요인과 기업가치" 한국세무학회 12 (12): 105-134, 2011

    9 장지인, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 재무성과와의 관계" 대한경영학회 23 (23): 633-648, 2010

    10 김창수, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업가치" 한국증권학회 38 (38): 507-545, 2009

    1 정석우, "회계이익의 지속성이 재무분석가의 이익예측오차와 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 209-235, 2005

    2 정석우, "환위험 기업에 대한 재무분석가 이익예측 특성" 한국회계학회 37 (37): 1-35, 2012

    3 안윤영, "재무분석가의 특성이 이익예측정확성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 1-23, 2006

    4 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    5 고유경, "신규 분석기업에 대한 재무분석가의 이익예측특성" 한국증권학회 39 (39): 419-447, 2010

    6 손성규, "다수 재무분석가에 의한 회계정보 예측의비교" 20 (20): 73-106, 1995

    7 이윤원, "기업특성과 재무분석가 예측정보의 정확성" 17 : 90-108, 1993

    8 고성천, "기업의 사회적 책임활동(CSR) 결정요인과 기업가치" 한국세무학회 12 (12): 105-134, 2011

    9 장지인, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 재무성과와의 관계" 대한경영학회 23 (23): 633-648, 2010

    10 김창수, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업가치" 한국증권학회 38 (38): 507-545, 2009

    11 나영, "기업규모에 따른 CSR활동과 기업가치에 대한 실증분석" 한국회계학회 20 (20): 125-160, 2011

    12 권수영, "경영자 이익예측정보와 재무분석가 이익예측수정" 한국증권학회 40 (40): 431-459, 2011

    13 Paine, L. S., "Value shift" McGraw-Hill 2002

    14 Brown, L., "The Superiority of Analyst Forecasts as Measure of Expectations: Evidence from Earnings" 1-16, 1978

    15 Imhoff, Jr., EA., "The Relation between Perceived Accounting Quality and Economic Characteristics of Firm" 11 (11): 97-118, 1992

    16 Hyan, C., "The Information Content of Losses" 20 : 125-153, 1995

    17 Abarbanell, J., "Test of Analysts' Overreaction/Underreaction to Earnings Information as Explanation for Anomalous Stock Price Behavior" 47 : 1181-1207, 1992

    18 Kim Y., "Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility?" 87 (87): 761-796, 2012

    19 Duru, A., "International Diversification and Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy and Bias" 77 : 415-433, 2002

    20 Wilcoxon, F., "Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods" 1 : 80-83, 1945

    21 Dahlsrud, A., "How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions" 15 : 1-13, 2006

    22 Bhushan, R., "Firm Characteristics and Analyst Following" 11 : 255-274, 1989

    23 Fried, D., "Financial Analysts' Forecasts of Earnings: A Better Surrogate for Market Expectations" 85-107, 1982

    24 Das, S., "Financial Analysts' Earings Forecasts for Loss Firms" 24 (24): 39-50, 1998

    25 Bricker, R., "Financial Analyst Assessment of Company Earnings Quality" (Summer) : 541-554, 1995

    26 Mendenhall, R., "Evidence of possible underweighting of earnings-related information" 29 : 170-180, 1991

    27 Das, S., "Earings Predictability and Bias in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts" 73 : 277-294, 1998

    28 Bradshaw, M., "Do Analysts and Auditors Use Information in Accruals?" 39 : 45-74, 2001

    29 Lang, M., "Corporate Disclosure and Analyst Behavior" 71 : 467-492, 1996

    30 Sedor, L., "An Explanation for Unintentional Optimism in Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts" 77 : 731-753, 2002

    31 Clarkson, M. B. E., "A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance" 20 : 92-117, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼