RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    카리스마적 리더십과 팀 혁신행동 및 주관적 팀 성과 간의 관계들에 대한 팀 효능감과 팀 긍정정서의 매개효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856935

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness(team innovative behavior and subjective team performance). Most previous studies have revolved around the cognitive side of this relationship and have suggested variables such as trust or efficacy as possible mediating variables of this relationship. We, however, believe that both cognitive and affective sides should be incorporated in order to understand the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness fully. Therefore, we propose that team efficacy and team positive affect are the two mediators between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness. Specifically, we predict that charismatic leadership positively relates both team efficacy and team positive affect. We also expect that both team efficacy and team positive affect, in turn, positively relate team innovative behavior and subjective team performance. In addition, we predict that team efficacy positively relates team positive affect. To investigate these hypotheses, we used data from survey questionnaires, which were completed from 109 teams including 1378 employees in two Korean firms. 44% of respondents were male, the average age of participants was 31.54 years( SD=12.5), and the average tenure in their current team was 54.27 months( SD=64.90). Level of analysis was a team level. We used structural equation modeling to analysis the data. The results showed that charismatic leadership positively related with team efficacy and teampositive affect. While teamefficacy significantly and positively related to the teaminnovative behavior, it did not relate with subjective team performance. Conversely, team positive affect significantly related with subjective team performance while it did not relate to the team innovative behavior. That is, team efficacy played the role of full mediator in the relationship between charismatic leadership and team innovative behavior while team positive affect fully mediated the relationship between charismatic leadership and subjective team performance. We also found that team efficacy positively and significantly related team positive affect. The followings are the implications. First, we contributed to better understanding of the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness considering both cognitive and affective mediators. Second, we explored the internal mechanism how charismatic leadership can influence team effectiveness using team-level analysis. Lastly, we showed that team positive affect can be triggered by not only charismatic leadership but also team`s efficacy.
    번역하기

    In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness(team innovative behavior and subjective team performance). Most previous studies have revolved around the cognitive side of this relationship a...

    In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness(team innovative behavior and subjective team performance). Most previous studies have revolved around the cognitive side of this relationship and have suggested variables such as trust or efficacy as possible mediating variables of this relationship. We, however, believe that both cognitive and affective sides should be incorporated in order to understand the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness fully. Therefore, we propose that team efficacy and team positive affect are the two mediators between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness. Specifically, we predict that charismatic leadership positively relates both team efficacy and team positive affect. We also expect that both team efficacy and team positive affect, in turn, positively relate team innovative behavior and subjective team performance. In addition, we predict that team efficacy positively relates team positive affect. To investigate these hypotheses, we used data from survey questionnaires, which were completed from 109 teams including 1378 employees in two Korean firms. 44% of respondents were male, the average age of participants was 31.54 years( SD=12.5), and the average tenure in their current team was 54.27 months( SD=64.90). Level of analysis was a team level. We used structural equation modeling to analysis the data. The results showed that charismatic leadership positively related with team efficacy and teampositive affect. While teamefficacy significantly and positively related to the teaminnovative behavior, it did not relate with subjective team performance. Conversely, team positive affect significantly related with subjective team performance while it did not relate to the team innovative behavior. That is, team efficacy played the role of full mediator in the relationship between charismatic leadership and team innovative behavior while team positive affect fully mediated the relationship between charismatic leadership and subjective team performance. We also found that team efficacy positively and significantly related team positive affect. The followings are the implications. First, we contributed to better understanding of the relationship between charismatic leadership and team effectiveness considering both cognitive and affective mediators. Second, we explored the internal mechanism how charismatic leadership can influence team effectiveness using team-level analysis. Lastly, we showed that team positive affect can be triggered by not only charismatic leadership but also team`s efficacy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이창준, "정서와 리더십에 대한 한 이론적 모형의 검증: 카리스마적 및 감성적 리더십, 집단정서, 집단효과성" 한국인사조직학회 15 (15): 1-51, 2007

    2 임희정, "인지 및 동기요인이 지식근로자의 팀 성과와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향" 한국인사조직학회 13 (13): 99-137, 2005

    3 이순묵, "요인분석의 기초" 교육과학사 2000

    4 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론" 학현사 1997

    5 박원우, "레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안" 한국인사조직학회 11 (11): 199-233, 2003

    6 박원우, "동일방법편의(Common Method Bias)의 원인과 해결방안" 한국인사조직학회 15 (15): 89-133, 2007

    7 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거" 19 (19): 161-177, 2000

    8 이순묵, "공변량구조분석" 성원사 1990

    9 김인수, "거시조직이론: 조직설계를 중심으로" 무역경영사 1999

    10 Vroom, V. H., "Work and motivation" Wiley 1964

    1 이창준, "정서와 리더십에 대한 한 이론적 모형의 검증: 카리스마적 및 감성적 리더십, 집단정서, 집단효과성" 한국인사조직학회 15 (15): 1-51, 2007

    2 임희정, "인지 및 동기요인이 지식근로자의 팀 성과와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향" 한국인사조직학회 13 (13): 99-137, 2005

    3 이순묵, "요인분석의 기초" 교육과학사 2000

    4 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론" 학현사 1997

    5 박원우, "레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안" 한국인사조직학회 11 (11): 199-233, 2003

    6 박원우, "동일방법편의(Common Method Bias)의 원인과 해결방안" 한국인사조직학회 15 (15): 89-133, 2007

    7 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거" 19 (19): 161-177, 2000

    8 이순묵, "공변량구조분석" 성원사 1990

    9 김인수, "거시조직이론: 조직설계를 중심으로" 무역경영사 1999

    10 Vroom, V. H., "Work and motivation" Wiley 1964

    11 Bliese, P. D., "Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis, In Mulitlevel theory, research, and methods in organizations" Jossey-Bass 349-381, 2000

    12 Barsade, S. G., "Why does affect matter in organizations?" 21 (21): 36-59, 2007

    13 Feldman, L. A., "Variations in the circumplex structure of mood" 21 (21): 806-817, 1995

    14 Lee, V. E., "Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: the case of school effects" 35 (35): 125-141, 2000

    15 Dirks, K. T., "Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice" 87 (87): 611-628, 2002

    16 Dirks, K. T., "Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball" 85 (85): 1004-1012, 2000

    17 Jung, D. I., "Transformational leadership in work groups: the role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collectiveefficacy on perceived group performance" 33 (33): 313-336, 2002

    18 Ashkanasy, N. M., "Transformational leadership as management of emotion: a conceptual review, In Emotion of Workplace Theory, Research, and Practice" Quorum 221-236, 2000

    19 Dionne, S. D., "Transformational leadership and team performance" 17 (17): 177-193, 2004

    20 Charbonneau, D., "Transformational leadership and sports performance: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation" 31 (31): 1512-1534, 2001

    21 Avolio, B. J., "Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance" 25 : 951-968, 2004

    22 Conger, J. A., "Towards a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings" 12 : 637-647, 1987

    23 House, R. J., "Toward the integration of charisma, visionary and transformational leadership theory, In Leadership theory and research: perspective and direction" Academic Press 81-107, 1993

    24 Sinclair, A., "They tyranny of a teamideology" 13 (13): 611-626, 1992

    25 Weber, M., "The theory of social and economic organization" Free Press 1947

    26 Fredrickson, B. L., "The role of positive emotions in positive psychology" 56 (56): 218-226, 2001

    27 Chen, G., "The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity" 87 (87): 549-556, 2002

    28 Barsade, S. G., "The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior" 47 : 644-675, 2002

    29 Shamir, B., "The motivational effect of charismatic leadership: a self-concept based theory" 4 : 577-594, 1993

    30 Riggs, M. L., "The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model" 79 (79): 755-766, 1994

    31 Spoor, J. R., "The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: communication and group bonding" 7 (7): 398-412, 2004

    32 Tasa, K., "The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective" 92 (92): 17-27, 2007

    33 Law, K. S., "The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies" 89 (89): 483-496, 2004

    34 Bartel, C. A., "The collective construction of work group moods" 45 : 197-231, 2000

    35 Posner, J., "The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology" 17 : 715-734, 2005

    36 Gardner, W. L., "The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective" 23 (23): 32-58, 1998

    37 Conger, J. A., "The charismatic leader: behind the mystique of exceptional leadership" Jossey-Bass 1989

    38 Barsade, S. G., "The affective revolution in organizational behavior: the emergence of a paradigm, In Organizational Behavior: The state of the science" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 3-52, 2003

    39 Yoon, J., "The Role of structure and motivation for workplace empowerment: the case of Korean employees" 64 (64): 195-206, 2001

    40 Scott, K., "Teams, teamwork and teambuilding : the manager ’s complete guide to teams in organizations" Prentice-Hall 1995

    41 Simons, T. L., "Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust" 85 (85): 102-111, 2000

    42 Ostroff, C., "Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships" 87 (87): 355-368, 2002

    43 Byrne, B. M., "Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1998

    44 Erez, A., "Stirring the hearts of followers: charismatic leadership as the transferal of Affect" 93 (93): 602-615, 2008

    45 Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought & action" Prentice- Hall 1986

    46 Kenny, D. A., "Separating individual and group effects" 48 (48): 339-348, 1985

    47 Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: the exercise of control" Freeman & Company 1997

    48 Locke, E. A., "Self-efficacy theory in contemporary psychology" 4 : 328-338, 1986

    49 Bono, J. E., "Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders" 46 (46): 554-571, 2003

    50 Remington, N. A., "Reexamining the circumplex model of affect" 79 (79): 286-300, 2000

    51 Edmondson, A., "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams" 44 : 350-383, 1999

    52 Larsen, J. R., "Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion, In Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotion and Social Behavior" Press 25-59, 1992

    53 Katz, R., "Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix" 28 (28): 67-87, 1985

    54 Bass, B. M., "Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership" 88 (88): 207-218, 2003

    55 Kline, T. J. B., "Predicting organizational team performance" 15 : 77-84, 1997

    56 Lawler, E. J., "Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negociated exchange" 58 : 465-481, 1993

    57 Fredrickson, B. L., "Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires" 19 : 313-332, 2005

    58 Yammarino, F. J., "Person and Situation Views of Leadership: A Multiple Levels of Analysis Approach" 2 (2): 121-139, 1991

    59 Cameron, K. S., "Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles" 26 : 525-544, 1981

    60 Brief. A. P., "Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace" 53 : 279-307, 2002

    61 Bartko, J. J., "On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients" 83 (83): 762-765, 1976

    62 Yammarino, F. J., "Multilevel Nature of and Multi-level Approaches to Leadership" 19 (19): 135-141, 2008

    63 Kark, R., "Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: the role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes" 32 (32): 500-528, 2007

    64 Forgas, J. P., "Mood and judgement: the affect infusion model" 117 (117): 39-66, 1995

    65 Van de Ven, A. H., "Measuring and assessing organization" John Willey & Sons 1980

    66 Ancona, D., "Management issues facing new product teams in high technology companies, In Advance in industrial and labor relations, Vol. 4" JAI Press 191-221, 1987

    67 Gooty, J., "Leadership, affect and emotions: a state of the science review" 21 (21): 979-1004, 2010

    68 Bass, B. M., "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" Free Press 1985

    69 Yammarino, F. J., "Leadership and Levels of Analysis: A State-of-the-science Review" 16 (16): 879-919, 2005

    70 Jöreskog, K. G., "LISREL8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language" Scientific Software International, Inc 1993

    71 Shrout, P. E., "Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability" 86 (86): 420-428, 1979

    72 Johnson, S. K., "I second that emotion: effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes" 19 : 1-19, 2008

    73 Izard, C. E., "Human Emotion" Plenum Press 1977

    74 Bryk, A. S., "Hierarchical linear models: application and Data Analysis Methods" Sage 1992

    75 Snyder, C. R., "Handbook of positive psychology" Oxford University Press 2002

    76 Barsade, S. G., "Group emotion: A view from top and bottom, In Research on Managing Groups and Teams Vol. 1" JAI Press 81-102, 1998

    77 Chan, D., "Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition model" 83 (83): 234-246, 1998

    78 Klein, K. J., "From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research" 3 (3): 211-236, 2000

    79 McGraw, K. O., "Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients" 1 (1): 30-46, 1996

    80 Kim, J., "Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues" Sage Publications 1978

    81 Ilies, R., "Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism-collectivism" 92 (92): 1140-1148, 2007

    82 Totterdell, P., "Evidence of mood linkage in work groups" 74 (74): 1504-1515, 1998

    83 Mulaik, A. A., "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit Indices for structural equation modeling" 105 (105): 430-445, 1989

    84 Gong, Y., "Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative selfefficacy" 52 (52): 765-778, 2009

    85 George, J. M., "Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence" 53 (53): 1027-1055, 2000

    86 Anderson, C., "Emotional convergence between people over time" 84 (84): 1054-1068, 2003

    87 Schaubroeck, J., "Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance" 92 (92): 1020-1030, 2007

    88 Masi, R. J., "Effects of transformational leadership on subordinate motivation, empowering norms, and organizational productivity" 8 (8): 16-47, 2000

    89 Lowe. K. B., "Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature" 7 (7): 385-425, 1996

    90 Cameron, K. S., "Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness" 32 (32): 539-553, 1986

    91 Johnson, S. K., "Do you feel what I feel: Mood contagion and leadership outcomes" 20 : 814-827, 2009

    92 Lewin, A., "Determining organizational effectiveness: another look and an agenda for research" 32 (32): 514-538, 1986

    93 Scott, S. G., "Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

    94 Shamir, B., "Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military unit: subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superior's appraisals of leader performance" 41 : 387-409, 1998

    95 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

    96 Lawler, E. J., "Commitment in exchange relations: test a theory of relational cohesion" 61 : 98-108, 1996

    97 Hiller, N. J., "Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: a field study" 17 (17): 387-397, 2006

    98 Watson, C. B., "Collective efficacy: a multilevel analysis" 27 (27): 1057-1068, 2001

    99 Stajkovic, A. D., "Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analysis of their relationships, and test of a mediation model" 94 (94): 814-828, 2009

    100 Dasborough, M. T., "Cognitive asymmetry in employee emotional reactions to leadership behaviors" 17 : 163-178, 2006

    101 Shae, C. M., "Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance" 10 (10): 375-396, 1999

    102 House, R. J., "Charismatic and non-charismatic leaders: differences in behavior and effectiveness, In Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness" Jossey-Bass 98-121, 1988

    103 Bono, J. E., "Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion" 17 (17): 317-334, 2006

    104 Dansereau, F., "Avoiding the fallacy of the wrong level: a within and between analysis (WABA) approach" 31 (31): 536-577, 2006

    105 Stevens, J., "Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002

    106 Schoorman, F. D., "An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future" 32 (32): 344-354, 2007

    107 Lawler, E. J., "An affect theory of social exchange" 107 (107): 321-352, 2001

    108 James, L. R., "Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement" 67 (67): 219-229, 1982

    109 Weiss, H. M., "Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work, In Research in organizational behavior, vol. 18" Elsevier Science/JAI Press 1-74, 1996

    110 Quinn, R. E., "A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis" 29 (29): 363-377, 1983

    111 Gully, S. M., "A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships" 87 : 819-832, 2002

    112 Connelly, S., "A closer look at the role emotions in charismatic and transformational leadership, In Transformational and charismatic leaders: The road ahead" Elsevier Science 255-283, 2002

    113 House, R. J., "A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership, In Leadership: the cutting edge" Southern Illinois University Press 189-207, 1977

    114 윤정구, "100년 기업의 변화 경영" 지식노마드 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼