RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    과업갈등이 프로젝트 팀 성과에 미치는 영향 = 팀효능감의 조절효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856762

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Team work to accomplish work-related activities in organizations is gaining the increasing popularity. However, for teams to realize their potential benefits, the challenges of working effectively as a team are considerable. One challenge is a conflict among team members due to the actual or perceived differences (Jehn, 1995). Even though a stream of research has been grown recently for an intragroup conflict and its potential effects on team performance and member satisfaction, the effect of intragroup conflict on team performance has been remained as a controversial topic. The search for the potential effects of conflict has been facilitated by distinguishing different types of conflict, task and relationship (Jehn, 1995, 1997; Pelled, 1996). A task conflict, sometimes referred as substantive or cognitive conflict, exists when team members differ in views and opinions about how particular aspects of tasks are accomplished, especially in procedural, policy, resource distribution issues (Amason, 1996; Simon and Peterson, 2000). In contrast, an affective or relationship conflict has an affective element at its core and involves perceived tension and frustration about personal differences such as interpersonal style, attitude and preference and personality. A long-held notion in the conflict literature is that a task conflict may actually be beneficial to team effectiveness, as opposed to a relationship conflict that has been theorized as an exclusively negative factor for teams (Jehn, 1995, 1997; Pelled, 1996). Given the opposite effects of different types of conflict, it would seem easy to resolve this dilemma by simply minimizing a relationship conflict and maximizing a task conflict. However, while a certain amount of agreement exists on the negative effect of relational conflict, the findings concerning a task conflict are not consistent. While task conflicts is generally associated with positive outcomes for teams (Simon and Peterson, 2000), recent a research has indicated that a task conflict may be most beneficial at moderate levels but may have a detrimental impact at higher level (Jehn and Mannix, 2001). Alternatively, a recent meta-analysis examining task conflict impacts suggests that a task conflict may be negatively associated with both group performance and satisfaction outcomes (De Dreu and Weingart, 2002). To analyze the controversial role of a task conflict, some researchers such as Jehn (1997) propose a contingency perspective in the study of team conflict. One promising potential moderator is team efficacy, or the belief by a team that it can be effective (Campion, Medsker and Higgs, 1993; Guzzo and Shea, 1992). A number of studies argues that teams with a high sense of team efficacy are more committed and willing to work hard for the team(Zaccaro, Rittman, and Marks, 2001), and are more effective at managing uncertainty due to the differences or conflicts among team members (Levin and Cross, 2004; Olson, Parayitam, and Bao, 2007). However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have investigated moderating impact of team efficacy on the relationship between a task conflict and team performance. Following this line of research, this study investigates the moderating effects of team efficacy on the relationship between a task conflict and team performance with a sample of 78 university student teams, comprising 341 respondents (on average 4.37 per team). A series of multiple regression analyses are used to test the hypothesized relationships. Hypothesis 1 predicts that a task conflict is positively related with team performance. Hypothesis 1a, as a contrasting hypothesis, predicts that a task conflict is negatively related to team performance. Hypothesis 2 predicts that the association between a task conflict and team performance will be moderated by team efficacy.The reliability coefficients for the variables are assessed by calculating Cronbach alpha coefficients. The reliability coefficients for all vari
    번역하기

    Team work to accomplish work-related activities in organizations is gaining the increasing popularity. However, for teams to realize their potential benefits, the challenges of working effectively as a team are considerable. One challenge is a conflic...

    Team work to accomplish work-related activities in organizations is gaining the increasing popularity. However, for teams to realize their potential benefits, the challenges of working effectively as a team are considerable. One challenge is a conflict among team members due to the actual or perceived differences (Jehn, 1995). Even though a stream of research has been grown recently for an intragroup conflict and its potential effects on team performance and member satisfaction, the effect of intragroup conflict on team performance has been remained as a controversial topic. The search for the potential effects of conflict has been facilitated by distinguishing different types of conflict, task and relationship (Jehn, 1995, 1997; Pelled, 1996). A task conflict, sometimes referred as substantive or cognitive conflict, exists when team members differ in views and opinions about how particular aspects of tasks are accomplished, especially in procedural, policy, resource distribution issues (Amason, 1996; Simon and Peterson, 2000). In contrast, an affective or relationship conflict has an affective element at its core and involves perceived tension and frustration about personal differences such as interpersonal style, attitude and preference and personality. A long-held notion in the conflict literature is that a task conflict may actually be beneficial to team effectiveness, as opposed to a relationship conflict that has been theorized as an exclusively negative factor for teams (Jehn, 1995, 1997; Pelled, 1996). Given the opposite effects of different types of conflict, it would seem easy to resolve this dilemma by simply minimizing a relationship conflict and maximizing a task conflict. However, while a certain amount of agreement exists on the negative effect of relational conflict, the findings concerning a task conflict are not consistent. While task conflicts is generally associated with positive outcomes for teams (Simon and Peterson, 2000), recent a research has indicated that a task conflict may be most beneficial at moderate levels but may have a detrimental impact at higher level (Jehn and Mannix, 2001). Alternatively, a recent meta-analysis examining task conflict impacts suggests that a task conflict may be negatively associated with both group performance and satisfaction outcomes (De Dreu and Weingart, 2002). To analyze the controversial role of a task conflict, some researchers such as Jehn (1997) propose a contingency perspective in the study of team conflict. One promising potential moderator is team efficacy, or the belief by a team that it can be effective (Campion, Medsker and Higgs, 1993; Guzzo and Shea, 1992). A number of studies argues that teams with a high sense of team efficacy are more committed and willing to work hard for the team(Zaccaro, Rittman, and Marks, 2001), and are more effective at managing uncertainty due to the differences or conflicts among team members (Levin and Cross, 2004; Olson, Parayitam, and Bao, 2007). However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have investigated moderating impact of team efficacy on the relationship between a task conflict and team performance. Following this line of research, this study investigates the moderating effects of team efficacy on the relationship between a task conflict and team performance with a sample of 78 university student teams, comprising 341 respondents (on average 4.37 per team). A series of multiple regression analyses are used to test the hypothesized relationships. Hypothesis 1 predicts that a task conflict is positively related with team performance. Hypothesis 1a, as a contrasting hypothesis, predicts that a task conflict is negatively related to team performance. Hypothesis 2 predicts that the association between a task conflict and team performance will be moderated by team efficacy.The reliability coefficients for the variables are assessed by calculating Cronbach alpha coefficients. The reliability coefficients for all vari

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 남창수, "팀 구성원들의 문화적 이질성과 과업복잡성이 팀 상호작용 프로세스에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 25 (25): 7-16, 2006

    2 박동수, "팀 과정특성과 구성원 태도의 관련성에 관한 실증적 연구" 13 : 1-30, 1998

    3 조봉순, "최고경영자 팀(TMT)의 다양성이 조직 성과에 미치는 영향: 집단 내 갈등의 매개효과에 대한 실증적 분석" 한국인사·조직학회 10 (10): 119-148, 2002

    4 김종우, "집단의 특성 및 과정과 효과성의 관계" 한국산업경영학회 20 (20): 251-289, 2005

    5 박원우, "집단성과에 대한 집단효능감의 부작용" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 1427-1448, 2006

    6 백기복, "집단 역량과 애피커시에 대한 종단 연구:변수의 측정,분석의 수준,그리고 성과 피드백의 영향을 중심으로" 2 (2): 115-140, 2000

    7 Jehn,K.A.,, "Why Differences Make a Difference:A Study of Diversity,Conflict and Performance in Workgroups" 44 : 741-764, 1999

    8 De Dreu,C, "When Too Little or Too Much Hurts:Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams" 32 (32): 83-107, 2006

    9 De Dreu,C, "Using Conflict in Organizations" Sage 1997

    10 Hambrick,D.C., "Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers" 9 : 193-206, 1984

    1 남창수, "팀 구성원들의 문화적 이질성과 과업복잡성이 팀 상호작용 프로세스에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 25 (25): 7-16, 2006

    2 박동수, "팀 과정특성과 구성원 태도의 관련성에 관한 실증적 연구" 13 : 1-30, 1998

    3 조봉순, "최고경영자 팀(TMT)의 다양성이 조직 성과에 미치는 영향: 집단 내 갈등의 매개효과에 대한 실증적 분석" 한국인사·조직학회 10 (10): 119-148, 2002

    4 김종우, "집단의 특성 및 과정과 효과성의 관계" 한국산업경영학회 20 (20): 251-289, 2005

    5 박원우, "집단성과에 대한 집단효능감의 부작용" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 1427-1448, 2006

    6 백기복, "집단 역량과 애피커시에 대한 종단 연구:변수의 측정,분석의 수준,그리고 성과 피드백의 영향을 중심으로" 2 (2): 115-140, 2000

    7 Jehn,K.A.,, "Why Differences Make a Difference:A Study of Diversity,Conflict and Performance in Workgroups" 44 : 741-764, 1999

    8 De Dreu,C, "When Too Little or Too Much Hurts:Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams" 32 (32): 83-107, 2006

    9 De Dreu,C, "Using Conflict in Organizations" Sage 1997

    10 Hambrick,D.C., "Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers" 9 : 193-206, 1984

    11 Medina,F.J, "Types of Intragroup Conflict and Affective Reactions" 20 : 219-230, 2005

    12 Bantel,K.A., "Top Management and Innovations in Banking:Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference?" 10 : 107-125, 1989

    13 Jehn,K.A, "To Agree or Not to Agree:The Effects of Value Congruence,Individual Demographic Dissimilarity,and Conflict on Workgroup Outcomes" 8 : 287-305, 1997

    14 Gersick,C.J.C, "Time and transition in work teams:toward a new model of group development" 31 : 9-41, 1988

    15 Staw,B.M, "Threat-rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior:A Multilevel Analysis" 26 : 501-524, 1981

    16 Lira,E.M, "The roles of group potency and information and communication technologies in the relationship between task conflict and team effectiveness:A longitudinal study" 23 : 2888-2903, 2007

    17 Levin,D.Z, "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust:The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer" 50 (50): 1477-1490, 2004

    18 Chaplin, W. F, "The Next Generation of Moderator Research in Personality Psychology" 59 : 143-178, 1991

    19 Jehn,K.A, "The Influence of Proportional and Perceptual Conflict Composition on Team Performance" 11 (11): 56-73, 2000

    20 Gamero N.,, "The Influence of Intra-team Conflict on Work Teams' Affective Climate:A Longitudinal Study" 81 : 47-69, 2008

    21 Riggs,M.L, "The Impact of Perceived Group Success-failure on Motivational Beliefs and Attitudes:A Causal Model" 81 (81): 187-198, 1994

    22 Jehn,K.A, "The Impact of Intragroup Conflict on Effectiveness: A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Conflict" Northwestern University 1992

    23 Amason,A.C, "The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict" 23 : 495-516, 1997

    24 Lerner,B.S, "The Effects of Goal Setting,Self-efficacy,Competition,and Personal Traits on the Performance of an Endurance Task" 17 : 138-152, 1995

    25 Nibler R., "The Effects of Culture and Cohesiveness on Intragroup Conflict and Effectiveness" 143 (143): 613-631, 2003

    26 Mroczek D.K., "The Effect of Daily Stress,Personality,and Age on Daily Negative Affect" 72 (72): 355-378, 2004

    27 Tjosvold,D, "The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations" 39 : 517-540, 1986

    28 Jehn,K.A, "The Dynamic Nature of Conflict:A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance" 44 : 238-251, 2001

    29 Hackman,J.R, "The Design of Work Teams of Organizational Behavior" Prentice-Hall 67-102, 1987

    30 Hoegl,M., "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects:A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence" 12 (12): 435-449, 2001

    31 Rayeski,E., "Team Resolution Process: A Guideline for Teams to Manage Conflict, Performance, and Discipline in In Proceedings of the international conference on work teams proceedings: Anniversary collection. The best of 1990-1994" University of North Texas, Center for the Study of Work Teams. 215-221, 1994

    32 Zaccaro,S.J, "Team Leadership" 12 : 451-483, 2001

    33 Simons,T.L., "TaskConflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust" 85 : 102-111, 2000

    34 De Dreu,C, "Task versus Relationship Conflict: A Meta Analysis" 2002

    35 Mohammed,S, "Surfaceand Deep-level Diversity in Workgroup:Examining the Moderating Effects of Team Orientation and Team Process on Relationship Conflict" 25 : 1015-1039, 2004

    36 Gemuenden,H.G., "Success Factors of Project Management:The Critical Few:An Empirical Investigation" 375-377, 1997

    37 Tellegen,A, "Structures of Mood and Personality and Their Relevance to Assessing Anxiety, with an Emphasis on Self-report Anxiety and the anxiety disorders" Erlbaum 681-706, 1985

    38 Bourgeois,L.J, "Strategic Goals,Environmental Uncertainty,and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments" 28 : 548-573, 1985

    39 Olsen B.J, "Strategic Decision Making:The Effect of Cognitive Diversity,Conflict,and Trust on Decision Outcomes" 33 (33): 196-222, 2007

    40 McClelland,G.H., "Statistical Difficulties of Detecting Interactions and Moderators" 114 : 376-390, 1993

    41 Brehmer,B, "Social Judgment Theory and the Analysis of Interpersonal Conflict" 83 : 985-1003, 1976

    42 Bandura,A, "Social Foundations of Thought and Action:A Social Cognitive Theor" Pretice-Hall 191-215, 1986

    43 Bandura,A, "Self-efficacy:The Exercise of Control" W.H. Freeman 1997

    44 Lee C., "Self-efficacy Beliefs:Comparison of Five Measures" 79 (79): 364-369, 1994

    45 Amason,A.C, "Resolving the Paradox of Conflict,Strategic Decision Making and Organizational Performance" 5 : 239-254, 1994

    46 Campion,M.A, "Relationships between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness:Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups" 46 (46): 823-850, 1993

    47 Campion,M.A, "Relationships between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness:A Replication and Extension" 49 (49): 429-452, 1996

    48 Pelled,L.H, "Relational Demography and Perceptions of Group Conflict and Performance:A Field Investigation" 7 : 230-246, 1996

    49 Jehn,K.A, "Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups" 42 : 538-566, 1997

    50 Priem,R, "Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry,Devil's Advocacy,and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making" 16 : 206-225, 1991

    51 Dyck,B, "Potential Conflict,Conflict Stimulus,and Organizational Performance:An Empirical Test" 7 : 295-313, 1996

    52 Kelly,H.H, "Personal Relationships:Their Structure and Prophecies" Erlbaum 1979

    53 Bourgeois,L.J, "Performance and Consensus" 1 : 227-248, 1980

    54 Bandura,A, "Perceived Self-efficacy in the Exercise of Personal Agency" 2 : 128-163, 1990

    55 Eisenhardt,K.M, "Organizational Growth:Linking Founding Team,Strategy,Environment,and Growth among U.S.Semiconductor Ventures" 35 : 484-503, 1990

    56 Pondy,L.R, "Organizational Conflict:Concepts and Models" 12 : 296-320, 1967

    57 Van de Vliert,E, "Optimizing Performance by Conflict Stimulation" 5 : 211-222, 1994

    58 Bailey,D.E, "Modeling Work Group Effectiveness in High-Technology Manufacturing Environments" 32 : 361-368, 2000

    59 Van de Ven,H.A., "Measuring and Assessing Organizations" Wiley 1980

    60 Lovelace,K, "Maximizing Cross-functional New Product Teams' Innovativeness and Constraint Adherence:A Conflict Communications Perspective" 44 : 779-793, 2001

    61 Henderson,J.C, "Managing I/S Design Teams:A Control Theories Perspective" 38 (38): 757-777, 1992

    62 Brown,L.D, "Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces" Addison-Wesley 1983

    63 Eisenhardt,K.M, "Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments" 32 : 543-576, 1989

    64 Brocker,J, "Low Self-esteem and Behavioral Plasticity In Review of Personality and Social Psychology" Sage Publications 1983

    65 Hansen,L.P, "Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators" 50 : 1029-1054, 1982

    66 Argyris,C, "Interpersonal Competence and Organizational Effectiveness" Dorsey 1962

    67 Wageman,R, "Interdependence and Group Effectiveness" 40 : 145-180, 1995

    68 Khan,M.A, "Impact of Task Conflict on Employee's Performance of Financial Institutions" 27 (27): 479-487, 2009

    69 Janssen,O, "How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams" 25 : 117-142, 1999

    70 Gersick,C.J.C., "Habitual Routines in Task-performance Groups" 47 : 65-97, 1990

    71 Gladstein,D.L, "Groups in Context:A Model of Task Group Effectiveness" 29 : 499-517, 1984

    72 Guzzo,R.A., "Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations IN Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology" Consulting Psychologists Press 269-313, 1992

    73 Peterson,R.S, "Group Dynamics in Top Management Teams:Groupthinking,Vigilance,and Alternative Models of Organizational Failure and Success" 73 : 272-305, 1998

    74 Schweiger,D.M, "Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making:A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry,Devil's Advocacy,and Consensus" 7 : 51-71, 1986

    75 Pelled,L.H.,, "Exploring the Black Box:An Analysis of Work Group Diversity,Conflict and Performance" 44 (44): 1-3, 1999

    76 James,L.R, "Estimating Within-group Interater Reliability with and without Response Bias" 69 : 85-98, 1984

    77 Jehn,K.A, "Enhancing Effectiveness:An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-Based Intragroup Conflict" 5 : 223-238, 1994

    78 Lindsley,D, "Efficacy-performance Spirals:A Multilevel Perspective" 20 : 645-678, 1995

    79 Schwenk,C.R, "Effect of Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Decision Making:A Meta-analysis" 47 : 161-176, 1990

    80 Amason,A.C, "Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision-making:Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams" 39 : 1996

    81 Pinkley,R.L, "Dimensions of Conflict Frame:Disputant Interpretations of Conflict" 75 : 117-126, 1990

    82 Pelled,L.H, "Demographic Diversity,Conflict,and Work Group Outcomes:An Intervening Process Theory" 7 (7): 615-631, 1996

    83 Ayoko,O.B, "Cultural Diversity and Leadership:A Conceptual Model of Leader Intervention in ConflictEvents in Culturally Heterogeneous Workgroups" 13 (13): 345-360, 2006

    84 Baron,R.A, "Countering the Effects of Destructive Criticism:The Relative Efficacy of Four Interventions" 75 : 235-245, 1990

    85 Tjosvold,D, "Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approach to Conflict:Accomplishments and Challenges" 47 (47): 285-342, 1998

    86 Deutsch,M, "Conflicts:Productive and Destructive" 25 : 7-41, 1969

    87 Amason,A.C,, "Conflict:An Important Dimension in Successful Management Teams" 24 : 20-35, 1995

    88 Ross,R.S, "Conflict,In Small Groups in Organizational Settings" Prentice-Hall 139-178, 1989

    89 Eisenhardt,K.M, "Conflict and Strategic Choice:How Top Management Teams Disagree" 39 (39): 42-62, 1997

    90 Wall,J, "Conflict and Its Management" 21 : 515-558, 1995

    91 White,H, "Asymptotic Theory of Econometrics" The Academic Press 1983

    92 Guetzkow,H, "An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-making Groups" 7 : 367-381, 1954

    93 Marks,M.A, "A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes" 26 (26): 356-376, 2001

    94 Cohen,S.G, "A Predictive Model of Self-managing Work Team Effectiveness" 49 : 643-676, 1996

    95 Jehn,K.A, "A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict" 40 (40): 256-284, 1995

    96 Sauley,K.S, "A Case of the Tail Wagging the Distribution" 15 : 335-344, 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼