RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    기술지향성과 환경요인이 제품창조성과 성과에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856737

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In recent years, many domestic firms have started showing interests in creative management. That’s because the firms have realized that the fast following strategy with emphasizing cost reductions may not be valid for success anymore. Particularly, product creativity have become one of the most important issues to the domestic manufacturing firms. However, few studies on product creativity have been published so far. Hence, the firms are experiencing somewhat difficulty in enhancing product creativity and, thereby, performance. Thus, the objectives of this study are two-fold as follows. First, the present study examines the effects of technology orientation on product creativity and performance. Past studies on technology orientation have mainly focused on the effects on product innovation and its direct relationship with performance. However, the theoretical background on the effects of technology orientation on product creativity exists in the literature. Furthermore, product creativity is a more concrete construct than product innovation. Hence, the construct of product creativity rather than product innovation would be more useful for firms in setting the direction of product development and evaluating its progression. Second, the present study examines the effects of competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance. Product development is considered as a response to changing environments. Hence, environmental forces are considered as important factors which would affect firm’s performance in the market. However, the impacts of competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance have not been studied yet. Thus, the study would be managerially very useful for dealing with changing environmental forces. Using structural equation modeling, the hypotheses that technology orientation positively affects product creativity and performance were supported. Using hierarchical regression analysis, the moderating effects of the competitive environments were partially supported. The results of this study have useful managerial implications, especially to firms with heavy investments in technological advancement. First, technology orientation would be a valid option for pursuing product creativity and, thereby, performance. Second, when the competitive environments are highly unstable, firms need to concentrate more on product meaningfulness than newness. Particularly under high demand uncertainty, since it is hard to identify customers’ preferences, investment in product newness could be wasteful. In such situation, it would be more effective to concentrate on product meaningfulness. The findings of this study provide two important practical contributions to the product creativity. First, the present study examined the effect of technology orientation on product meaningfulness. Second, by evaluating the moderating effects of the competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance, the present study identified useful strategies under specific environmental forces. Although the present study makes various theoretical and managerial contributions, it has the following limitations. First, the present study includes technology only without considering market orientation and entrepreneurship. Hence, it would be valuable to incorporate those strategic orientations into future studies. Second, this study collected data from executives and senior managers of manufacturing firms, not from customers. Even though the firms may think their products are creative, it is possible that customers may not think so. Thus, in future studies, different research designs may be needed. Third, this study considers manufacturing firms only. Hence, the results of the present study may not be relevant to service firms and so, similar or modified research designs may be required.
    번역하기

    In recent years, many domestic firms have started showing interests in creative management. That’s because the firms have realized that the fast following strategy with emphasizing cost reductions may not be valid for success anymore. Particularly, ...

    In recent years, many domestic firms have started showing interests in creative management. That’s because the firms have realized that the fast following strategy with emphasizing cost reductions may not be valid for success anymore. Particularly, product creativity have become one of the most important issues to the domestic manufacturing firms. However, few studies on product creativity have been published so far. Hence, the firms are experiencing somewhat difficulty in enhancing product creativity and, thereby, performance. Thus, the objectives of this study are two-fold as follows. First, the present study examines the effects of technology orientation on product creativity and performance. Past studies on technology orientation have mainly focused on the effects on product innovation and its direct relationship with performance. However, the theoretical background on the effects of technology orientation on product creativity exists in the literature. Furthermore, product creativity is a more concrete construct than product innovation. Hence, the construct of product creativity rather than product innovation would be more useful for firms in setting the direction of product development and evaluating its progression. Second, the present study examines the effects of competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance. Product development is considered as a response to changing environments. Hence, environmental forces are considered as important factors which would affect firm’s performance in the market. However, the impacts of competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance have not been studied yet. Thus, the study would be managerially very useful for dealing with changing environmental forces. Using structural equation modeling, the hypotheses that technology orientation positively affects product creativity and performance were supported. Using hierarchical regression analysis, the moderating effects of the competitive environments were partially supported. The results of this study have useful managerial implications, especially to firms with heavy investments in technological advancement. First, technology orientation would be a valid option for pursuing product creativity and, thereby, performance. Second, when the competitive environments are highly unstable, firms need to concentrate more on product meaningfulness than newness. Particularly under high demand uncertainty, since it is hard to identify customers’ preferences, investment in product newness could be wasteful. In such situation, it would be more effective to concentrate on product meaningfulness. The findings of this study provide two important practical contributions to the product creativity. First, the present study examined the effect of technology orientation on product meaningfulness. Second, by evaluating the moderating effects of the competitive environments on the relationship between product creativity and performance, the present study identified useful strategies under specific environmental forces. Although the present study makes various theoretical and managerial contributions, it has the following limitations. First, the present study includes technology only without considering market orientation and entrepreneurship. Hence, it would be valuable to incorporate those strategic orientations into future studies. Second, this study collected data from executives and senior managers of manufacturing firms, not from customers. Even though the firms may think their products are creative, it is possible that customers may not think so. Thus, in future studies, different research designs may be needed. Third, this study considers manufacturing firms only. Hence, the results of the present study may not be relevant to service firms and so, similar or modified research designs may be required.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 양영익, "한국제조기업의 시장지향성이 제품혁신,마케팅능력,그리고 성과에 미치는 영향" 22 (22): 223-254, 2007

    2 정덕화, "신제품개발 조직특성이 신제품 창조성과 개발성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 109-132, 2006

    3 정덕화, "시장지향성이 제품성과 영향을 미치는데 있어 심제품 창조성의 매개효과: 식음료 제조기업을 중심으로" 한국전략마케팅학회 14 (14): 25-55, 2006

    4 김경훈, "마케팅창조성에 관한 연구" 2 : 235-260, 1998

    5 류창열, "기술적 창조성과 혁신의 의미 탐색" 5 (5): 1-17, 2005

    6 Jackson, Phillip W., "The Person, the Product, and the Response: Conceptual Problems in the Assessment of Creativity" 33 : 309-329, 1965

    7 Day,George S., "The Market Driven Organization" The Free Press 1999

    8 Li, Tiger, "The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage:Conceptualization and Empirical Examination" 62 : 13-29, 1998

    9 Zhou, Kevin Zheng, "The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology-and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations" 69 : 42-60, 2005

    10 Matsuno, Ken, "The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance" 66 : 18-32, 2002

    1 양영익, "한국제조기업의 시장지향성이 제품혁신,마케팅능력,그리고 성과에 미치는 영향" 22 (22): 223-254, 2007

    2 정덕화, "신제품개발 조직특성이 신제품 창조성과 개발성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 109-132, 2006

    3 정덕화, "시장지향성이 제품성과 영향을 미치는데 있어 심제품 창조성의 매개효과: 식음료 제조기업을 중심으로" 한국전략마케팅학회 14 (14): 25-55, 2006

    4 김경훈, "마케팅창조성에 관한 연구" 2 : 235-260, 1998

    5 류창열, "기술적 창조성과 혁신의 의미 탐색" 5 (5): 1-17, 2005

    6 Jackson, Phillip W., "The Person, the Product, and the Response: Conceptual Problems in the Assessment of Creativity" 33 : 309-329, 1965

    7 Day,George S., "The Market Driven Organization" The Free Press 1999

    8 Li, Tiger, "The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage:Conceptualization and Empirical Examination" 62 : 13-29, 1998

    9 Zhou, Kevin Zheng, "The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology-and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations" 69 : 42-60, 2005

    10 Matsuno, Ken, "The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance" 66 : 18-32, 2002

    11 Narver, John C, "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability" 54 : 20-35, 1990

    12 Vorhies, Douglas W, "The Capabilities and Performance Advantages of Market Driven Firms:An Empirical Investigation" 25 (25): 145-171, 2000

    13 Gatignon, Hubert, "Strategic Orientation of the Firms and New Product Performance" 34 : 77-90, 1997

    14 Podsakoff, Phillip M, "Self-Reports in Organizational Research:Problems and Prospects" 12 (12): 531-544, 1986

    15 Korsgaard, Andrey M, "Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Voice in Performance Appraisal Discussion" 21 (21): 657-669, 1995

    16 Gao, Gerald Yong, "On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China" 24 : 3-15, 2007

    17 Amabile,Teresa M., "Motivating Creativity in Organizations:On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do" 40 (40): 39-58, 1997

    18 Workman,John P., "Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm" 30 : 405-421, 1993

    19 Tuominen, Matti, "Market-driving versus marketdriven:Divergent roles of market orientation in business relationships" 33 : 207-217, 2004

    20 Kohli, Ajay K, "Market Orientation:The Construct,Research Propositions,and Managerial Implications" 54 : 1-18, 1990

    21 Jaworski, Bernard J., "Market Orientation:Antecedents and Consequences" 57 : 53-70, 1993

    22 Im, Subin, "Market Orientation,Creativity,and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms" 68 : 114-132, 2004

    23 Hurley, Robert F, "Innovation,Market Orientation,and Or ganizational Learning:An Integration and Empirical Examination" 62 : 42-54, 1998

    24 Ettlie, John. E, "Firm Size and Product Innovation" 4 : 89-108, 1987

    25 Shelley,Christina E., "Effects of Coaction,Expected Evaluation,and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity" 38 (38): 483-503, 1995

    26 Salavou,Helen, "Do Customer and Technology Orientations Influence Product Innovativeness in SMEs? Some New Evidence from Greece" 21 : 307-338, 2005

    27 Christensen, Clayton M, "Customer Power,Strategic Investment,and the Failure of Leading firms" 17 : 197-218, 1996

    28 Sethi, Rajesh, "Cross-Functional Product Development Teams,Creativity,and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products" 38 : 73-85, 2001

    29 Podsakoff, Phillip M, "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research:A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

    30 Berghman, Liselore, "Building competences for new customer value creation:An exploratory study" 35 : 961-973, 2006

    31 Singh, J., "Boundary Role Ambiguity in Marketing Oriented Positions:A Multidimensional,Multifaceted Operationalization" 28 : 328-338, 1991

    32 Amabile, Teresa M, "Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity" 39 (39): 1154-1184, 1996

    33 Jeong, Insik, "Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development:The case of Chinese Manufactures" 35 : 348-358, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼