RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    벤처캐피탈리스트의 조기업적과시현상과 IPO 성과 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856314

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper examines the grandstanding of venture capitalist and the performance of venture capital-hacked IPOs using companies listed on KOSDAQ. In investigation of the grandstanding of venture capitalist, our paper shows that the companies backed by venture capital tend to issue IPOS earlier compared with the firms rot backe by venture capital. However, our empirical results show that business history of the going public firms of the experienced venture capitalists is not different from business history of the going public firms basked by unexperienced venture capital firms. This result is different from Gompers` study(7996) which unexperienced venture capitalists tend to make their portfolio firms go public earlier than experienced venture capitalists. The short-term excess returns of IPOs between reputational and nonreputational venture capitalists are different. but statistically insignificant, And the change of equity ratio of two groups after IPOS also avows a bit difference. but statistically insignificant However. we explored the long-term performance of IPOs with utilization of three factor model of Fama and French(1992, 1793). Our result shows that venture capital-backed IPOs outperforms nonventure capital-backed IPOs,
    번역하기

    This paper examines the grandstanding of venture capitalist and the performance of venture capital-hacked IPOs using companies listed on KOSDAQ. In investigation of the grandstanding of venture capitalist, our paper shows that the companies backed by ...

    This paper examines the grandstanding of venture capitalist and the performance of venture capital-hacked IPOs using companies listed on KOSDAQ. In investigation of the grandstanding of venture capitalist, our paper shows that the companies backed by venture capital tend to issue IPOS earlier compared with the firms rot backe by venture capital. However, our empirical results show that business history of the going public firms of the experienced venture capitalists is not different from business history of the going public firms basked by unexperienced venture capital firms. This result is different from Gompers` study(7996) which unexperienced venture capitalists tend to make their portfolio firms go public earlier than experienced venture capitalists. The short-term excess returns of IPOs between reputational and nonreputational venture capitalists are different. but statistically insignificant, And the change of equity ratio of two groups after IPOS also avows a bit difference. but statistically insignificant However. we explored the long-term performance of IPOs with utilization of three factor model of Fama and French(1992, 1793). Our result shows that venture capital-backed IPOs outperforms nonventure capital-backed IPOs,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼