RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비자불안의 수준과 영향요인: 유전자재조합식품, 식품첨가물, 광우병을 중심으로 = Levels of Consumer Anxiety and its Determinants: Focus on Genetically-Modified Foods, Food Additives, and Mad Cow Disease

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100768654

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Consumers express subjective emotional reactions to technologies compared to experts, who make a logical, objective risk assessment. Considering the gap in scientific knowledge between consumers and experts, it is understandable and even natural. For this reason, this study explores the levels of consumers’ emotional reactions, that is, anxiety, and identify its determinants. As the object of anxiety, we selected genetically modified food (GMO), food additives, and mad cow diseases because consumers worry about these cases more than experts as it have both characteristics as food and technological risk. For this research, an online panel survey was performed on 509 adult consumers, and based on this, the results are as follows: First, levels of consumer anxiety was higher in order of mad cow disease, genetically modified foods, food additives. Comparing with previous studies, the results shows the anxiety level of mad cow disease was more increased than other two cases. Considering circumstances around mad cow disease in 2008, the result indicates level of consumer anxiety is influenced by social issues. Therefore, we should monitor the changes in level of consumer anxiety and correspond to these changes rapidly. Second, the variables which make significant differences between anxiety levels of consumer groups was not same on each case. For GMOs and food additives, high levels of anxiety appeared in older, married, and housewives groups, whereas groups who had more liberal political tendencies showed a higher level of anxiety for mad cow disease. This result reflects what consumer groups show the relatively high level of anxiety and indicates who should be considered to manage consumer anxiety more efficiently. Third, according to the multiple regression analysis, the perception of uncontrollable state was the only variable which had a significant influence on consumers’ anxiety in all three cases. Meanwhile, the other variables showed different influences and different relative power of impact on consumers’ anxiety in each case. First, in GMO foods, objective(-) and subjective knowledge(+), risk perception of uncontrollable state(+), and gender(+, 0=male/1=female) showed a significant impact on consumer anxiety. Second, in the case of food additives, only the risk perception of uncontrollable state(+) and gender(+, 0=male/1=female) showed a significant impact on levels of consumer anxiety. Finally, in the case of Mad Cow Disease, objective knowledge (-), trust of the government(-), trust of online communities and blogs(+), and the risk perception of uncontrollable state(+) showed a significant impact on levels of consumer anxiety. Comparing each variable’s relative power of impact, objective knowledge was the most powerful variable which affects levels of consumer anxiety on GMO foods, while trust of the government was the most powerful variable in relation to Mad Cow Disease. This result shows policy makers should consider different strategies for different cases to reduce consumer anxiety more effectively. Based on these results, for the more effective management of consumer anxiety we should allocate government resources in the right places by finding cases and groups which show high levels of anxiety, and considering different factors which affect levels of anxiety.
    번역하기

    Consumers express subjective emotional reactions to technologies compared to experts, who make a logical, objective risk assessment. Considering the gap in scientific knowledge between consumers and experts, it is understandable and even natural. For ...

    Consumers express subjective emotional reactions to technologies compared to experts, who make a logical, objective risk assessment. Considering the gap in scientific knowledge between consumers and experts, it is understandable and even natural. For this reason, this study explores the levels of consumers’ emotional reactions, that is, anxiety, and identify its determinants. As the object of anxiety, we selected genetically modified food (GMO), food additives, and mad cow diseases because consumers worry about these cases more than experts as it have both characteristics as food and technological risk. For this research, an online panel survey was performed on 509 adult consumers, and based on this, the results are as follows: First, levels of consumer anxiety was higher in order of mad cow disease, genetically modified foods, food additives. Comparing with previous studies, the results shows the anxiety level of mad cow disease was more increased than other two cases. Considering circumstances around mad cow disease in 2008, the result indicates level of consumer anxiety is influenced by social issues. Therefore, we should monitor the changes in level of consumer anxiety and correspond to these changes rapidly. Second, the variables which make significant differences between anxiety levels of consumer groups was not same on each case. For GMOs and food additives, high levels of anxiety appeared in older, married, and housewives groups, whereas groups who had more liberal political tendencies showed a higher level of anxiety for mad cow disease. This result reflects what consumer groups show the relatively high level of anxiety and indicates who should be considered to manage consumer anxiety more efficiently. Third, according to the multiple regression analysis, the perception of uncontrollable state was the only variable which had a significant influence on consumers’ anxiety in all three cases. Meanwhile, the other variables showed different influences and different relative power of impact on consumers’ anxiety in each case. First, in GMO foods, objective(-) and subjective knowledge(+), risk perception of uncontrollable state(+), and gender(+, 0=male/1=female) showed a significant impact on consumer anxiety. Second, in the case of food additives, only the risk perception of uncontrollable state(+) and gender(+, 0=male/1=female) showed a significant impact on levels of consumer anxiety. Finally, in the case of Mad Cow Disease, objective knowledge (-), trust of the government(-), trust of online communities and blogs(+), and the risk perception of uncontrollable state(+) showed a significant impact on levels of consumer anxiety. Comparing each variable’s relative power of impact, objective knowledge was the most powerful variable which affects levels of consumer anxiety on GMO foods, while trust of the government was the most powerful variable in relation to Mad Cow Disease. This result shows policy makers should consider different strategies for different cases to reduce consumer anxiety more effectively. Based on these results, for the more effective management of consumer anxiety we should allocate government resources in the right places by finding cases and groups which show high levels of anxiety, and considering different factors which affect levels of anxiety.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 장택원, "특정(경제)이슈에 관한 걱정(Anxiety)이 광고에 대한 인식에 주는 영향 연구" 한국광고홍보학회 11 (11): 119-143, 2009

    2 강승임, "청소년기 불안의 교육적 함의 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2007

    3 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    4 Freud, S., "정신분석강의" 열린책들 2003

    5 양건모, "정부신뢰 개념의 이론적 논의 및 타당성 검증" 한국행정학회 3 : 173-194, 2007

    6 유태순, "의복 구매불안 척도의 개발" 44 (44): 287-309, 1992

    7 김영찬, "유전자재조합 식품의 안전성에 대한 기본인식 조사 : 식품관련 전문가 그룹을 중심으로" 14 (14): 397-407, 1999

    8 차용진, "위험인식과 위험분석의 정책적 함의: 수도권 일반주민을 중심으로" 한국정책학회 16 (16): 97-116, 2007

    9 Beck, U., "위험사회: 새로운 근대(성)을 향하여" 새물결 1986

    10 권선향, "우리나라 국민의 유전자재조합식품에 대한 인지도 및 수용도 변화" 한국식품위생안전성학회 23 (23): 182-190, 2008

    1 장택원, "특정(경제)이슈에 관한 걱정(Anxiety)이 광고에 대한 인식에 주는 영향 연구" 한국광고홍보학회 11 (11): 119-143, 2009

    2 강승임, "청소년기 불안의 교육적 함의 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2007

    3 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    4 Freud, S., "정신분석강의" 열린책들 2003

    5 양건모, "정부신뢰 개념의 이론적 논의 및 타당성 검증" 한국행정학회 3 : 173-194, 2007

    6 유태순, "의복 구매불안 척도의 개발" 44 (44): 287-309, 1992

    7 김영찬, "유전자재조합 식품의 안전성에 대한 기본인식 조사 : 식품관련 전문가 그룹을 중심으로" 14 (14): 397-407, 1999

    8 차용진, "위험인식과 위험분석의 정책적 함의: 수도권 일반주민을 중심으로" 한국정책학회 16 (16): 97-116, 2007

    9 Beck, U., "위험사회: 새로운 근대(성)을 향하여" 새물결 1986

    10 권선향, "우리나라 국민의 유전자재조합식품에 대한 인지도 및 수용도 변화" 한국식품위생안전성학회 23 (23): 182-190, 2008

    11 김현희, "여고생의 화장행동과 화장품 구매불안에 관한 연구" 26 (26): 251-262, 2002

    12 사지연, "식품의 기술적 위험에 대한 소비자의 인식수준 비교분석: 유전자재조합식품, 식품첨가물, 광우병을 대상으로" 한국소비자정책교육학회 9 (9): 1-28, 2013

    13 송유진, "식품구매시 소비자의 지각된 위험이 안전의식과 안전추구행동에 미치는 영향력의 구조모형분석 - 서울과 상해소비자를 중심으로 -" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 215-244, 2008

    14 이기춘, "소비자학의 이해(제2판)" 학현사 2001

    15 김기원, "소비자의 주관적 지식 측정을 위한척도의개발" 1 (1): 89-119, 2000

    16 유현정, "소비자의 식품안전지향행동의 구조모형 분석" 2012 (2012): 260-267, 2012

    17 김성숙, "소비자의 식품안전에 대한 태도와 친환경농산물 구매행동에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 25 (25): 15-32, 2007

    18 김효정, "소비자의 식품 안전성에 대한 인지도 및 정보요구도에 관한 분석-방사선조사 식품과 환경호르몬을 중심으로-" 한국식생활문화학회 17 (17): 153-164, 2002

    19 이나경, "세계관과 위험지각에서 전문가와 일반인의 차이: 문화이론 다시보기" 한국심리학회 27 (27): 635-651, 2008

    20 유태순, "상황-특성불안과 의복선택 : 구매행동과의 상관관계" 1 : 89-108, 1992

    21 허창범, "불안이론에 대한 고찰" 6 : 252-260, 2000

    22 Kierkegaard, S., "불안의 개념" 한길사 2007

    23 최승균, "광우병 관련 지식수준과 미국산 쇠고기에 대한 인식 및 태도 - 서울·수도권 대학생을 대상으로 -" 한국생활과학회 20 (20): 439-448, 2011

    24 왕재선, "과학기술인식의 다원성과 영향요인: 유전자변형식품(Genetically Modified Food: GM Food)에 대한 일반인의 인식을 중심으로" 정부학연구소 17 (17): 145-185, 2011

    25 송위진, "과학기술과 사회의 주요쟁점 분석 연구" 과학기술정책연구원 2003

    26 김동광, "과학과 대중의 관계변화: 대중에 대한 인식변화를 중심으로" 1 (1): 89-119, 2002

    27 박희제, "공중의 과학이해 연구의 두 흐름: 조사연구와구성주의PUS의상보적발전을 향하여" 2 (2): 25-54, 2002

    28 Sjoberg, L., "Worry and Risk Perception" 18 (18): 85-93, 1998

    29 Gaskell, G., "Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U. S" 285 : 384-388, 1999

    30 Fischer, W. F., "Theories of Anxiety" Hamper&Row Publishers 1970

    31 Slovic, P., "The perception of risk" Earth scan Publications 2000

    32 Frewer, L. J., "The interrelationship between perceived knowledge, control and risk associated with a range of food-related hazards targeted at the individual, other people and society" 14 (14): 19-40, 1994

    33 Siegrist, M., "The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the accptance of gene technology" 20 (20): 195-203, 2000

    34 Taylor, J. W., "The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior" 38 (38): 54-60, 1974

    35 Locander, W. B., "The Effect of Self-Confidence and Anxiety on Information Seeking in Consumer Risk Reduction" 16 (16): 268-274, 1979

    36 Gatignon, H., "Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects" 35-49, 1989

    37 한덕웅, "Spielberger의 상태-특성 불안검사 Y형의 개발" 1 (1): 1-14, 1996

    38 Allum, N., "Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures : A meta-analysis" 17 (17): 35-54, 2008

    39 Sturgis, P., "Science in society : re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes" 13 (13): 55-74, 2004

    40 Burns, T. W., "Science communication : a contemporary definition" 12 : 183-202, 2003

    41 Starr, C., "Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability" 5 (5): 97-102, 1985

    42 Sandman, P. M., "Risk Communication : Facing Public Outrage" 13 (13): 21-22, 1987

    43 Ellen, P. S., "Resistance to technological innovations : an examination of the role of selfefficacy and performance satisfaction" 19 (19): 297-307, 1991

    44 Drottz-Sjöberg, B. M., "Perception of risk:Studies of risk attitudes, perceptions and definitions" Stockholm School of Economics 1991

    45 Siegrist, M., "Perception of hazards : The role of social trust and knowledge" 20 (20): 713-720, 2000

    46 Slovic, P., "Perception of Risk" 236 : 280-285, 1987

    47 House, L., "Objective and Subjective Knowledge : Impacts on consumer demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union" 7 (7): 113-123, 2005

    48 Sjoberg, L., "Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust" 21 (21): 189-198, 2001

    49 Yeung, R. M., "Food safety risk : consumer perception and purchase behaviour" 103 (103): 170-187, 2001

    50 Petts, J., "Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decision making : challenges for deliberative democracy" 38 (38): 1045-, 2006

    51 Bauer, R. A., "Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World" American Marketing Assn 1960

    52 Walkley, S., "Cutting through the red tape in Europe" Frozen Food Age 1999

    53 Huffman, W. E., "Consumers' acceptance of(and resistance to)genetically modified foods in high-income countries : effects of labels and information in an uncertain environment" 85 (85): 1112-1118, 2003

    54 Ram, S., "Consumer resistance to innovations : the marketing problem and its solutions" 6 (6): 5-14, 1989

    55 Johnson, D., "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships" 58 (58): 500-507, 2005

    56 Marlier, E., "Biotechnology in Public: a Review of Recent Research" Sci. Museum for Eur. Fed. Biotechnol 52-108, 1992

    57 Hansen, J., "Beyond the knowledge deficit : recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks" 41 : 111-121, 2003

    58 Mohr, P., "Attitudes, values, and socio-demographic characteristics that predict acceptance of genetic engineering and applications of new technology in Australia" 2 : 1169-1178, 2007

    59 Spielberger, C. D., "Anxiety as Emotional State : Current Trends in Theory and Research" Academic Press 1972

    60 Sego, T., "Anxiety Associated with Social Issues : The Development of a Scale to Measure an Antecedent Construct" 21 : 601-606, 1994

    61 Mazzocchi, M., "An integrative model of organizational trust" 20 (20): 709-734, 1995

    62 Kleijnen, M., "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents" 30 (30): 344-357, 2009

    63 Hoban, T., "American consumer views on biotechnology" 43 (43): 20-22, 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼