RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한국 전통음식 관광상품 선택 속성에 관한 연구 = Assessing relative importance of Korean traditional food tour program attributes based on conjoint analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103927985

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to assess the structure of the decision and the importance of the attributes in choosing food-related tour program. Questionnaires were developed in three languages- Japanese, Chinese, and English- given to 300 foreign tourists who have visited Korea in 2002. Statistical data analysis was completed using SPSS Win (ver 11.0) for descriptive analysis and conjoint analysis. The results of this study showed that the ‘price’ was the most important attribute (35.62%) in choosing a hypothetical food tourism program, followed by ‘place’ (27.35%), ‘time’ (26.01%), and ‘type of program’ (10.22%). With respect to the relative importance values for each attribute by different groups, English- and Chinese-speaking tourists considered ‘price’ more than other factors, while ‘time’ was regarded as the most important factor for Japanese tourists. Therefore, it indicated the need to recognize the different needs among tourists and put these factors into consideration in developing the programs. (Korean J Community Nutrition 9(5) : 654 ~ 662, 2004)
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to assess the structure of the decision and the importance of the attributes in choosing food-related tour program. Questionnaires were developed in three languages- Japanese, Chinese, and English- given to 300 foreign to...

    The purpose of this study was to assess the structure of the decision and the importance of the attributes in choosing food-related tour program. Questionnaires were developed in three languages- Japanese, Chinese, and English- given to 300 foreign tourists who have visited Korea in 2002. Statistical data analysis was completed using SPSS Win (ver 11.0) for descriptive analysis and conjoint analysis. The results of this study showed that the ‘price’ was the most important attribute (35.62%) in choosing a hypothetical food tourism program, followed by ‘place’ (27.35%), ‘time’ (26.01%), and ‘type of program’ (10.22%). With respect to the relative importance values for each attribute by different groups, English- and Chinese-speaking tourists considered ‘price’ more than other factors, while ‘time’ was regarded as the most important factor for Japanese tourists. Therefore, it indicated the need to recognize the different needs among tourists and put these factors into consideration in developing the programs. (Korean J Community Nutrition 9(5) : 654 ~ 662, 2004)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "towards an understanding of sustainable culture Journal of Sustainable Tourism 1" 48-54, 1993

    2 "We never eat like this at home: food on holiday" Routledge 1997

    3 "Towards an structural model of the tourist experience: an illustration from food experiences in tourism" 25 (25): 297-305, 2003

    4 "Tourism and gastronomy" Routledge 2002

    5 "Tourism and Culture" HakmoonSa 1999

    6 "Research methodology in social science" Bub-mun Sa Korea National Tourism Organization 2001

    7 "Principles of Marketing" Hyung Seul 1998

    8 "Marketing Science," Beob Moon Sa 1997

    9 "Journal of Leisure Research 24" 171-184, 1992

    10 "Hong Kong as a travel destination- An analysis of Japanese tourist’s satisfaction levels, and the likelihood of them recommending Hong Kong to others" 9 (9): 57-80, 2000

    1 "towards an understanding of sustainable culture Journal of Sustainable Tourism 1" 48-54, 1993

    2 "We never eat like this at home: food on holiday" Routledge 1997

    3 "Towards an structural model of the tourist experience: an illustration from food experiences in tourism" 25 (25): 297-305, 2003

    4 "Tourism and gastronomy" Routledge 2002

    5 "Tourism and Culture" HakmoonSa 1999

    6 "Research methodology in social science" Bub-mun Sa Korea National Tourism Organization 2001

    7 "Principles of Marketing" Hyung Seul 1998

    8 "Marketing Science," Beob Moon Sa 1997

    9 "Journal of Leisure Research 24" 171-184, 1992

    10 "Hong Kong as a travel destination- An analysis of Japanese tourist’s satisfaction levels, and the likelihood of them recommending Hong Kong to others" 9 (9): 57-80, 2000

    11 "Food tourism around the world" Butterworth-Heinemann 2003

    12 "Food preferences of foreigners residing in Korea Journal of Korean Home EconomicsAssociation 24" 63-73, 1986

    13 "Exploratory study on the availability of cultural tourism merchandising of Korean traditional cuisine -Focusing on introduction of fusion· franchise concept" (4) : 2002

    14 "Evaluating management efectivenes in co-munity-run festivals" 27 (27): 22-27, 1988

    15 "Dimensions of the hospitality industry" Wiley, 2001

    16 "Cultural Tourism" DaeWangSa 1999

    17 "Conjoint analysis of Downhill skiers used to improve data collection for market segmentation" 5 (5): 187-206, 1997187-206

    18 "Anti-tourist attitudes: Mediterranean charter tourism" 27 (27): 284-300, 2000

    19 "A taste of wales- Blas AR Gymru” : Institutional malaise in promoting welsh food tourism products" Routldge 2002

    20 "A study on the tourism merchandising for traditional folk cultural festival -Focused on Choohyang-Jae and HeungbooJae of Namwon" 1998

    21 "A study on merchandising of experience tourists onKorea traditional cultures" 16 : 51-62, 2002

    22 "A day in the city - Using conjoint choice experiments to model urban tourists choice of activity packages." 16 (16): 347-353, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.15 1.15 1.13
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.28 1.21 1.764 0.42
    더보기
    해외이동버튼