RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    유아교육기관의 급식에 대한 학부모의 태도 및 인식조사 = Parents' perception and attitudes to the school meal service program(SMSP) in kindergarten

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103931557

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This Study investigated kindergarten parents’ attitude, satisfaction and demand in the school meal service programs (SMSP). The subjects were 2450 parents that their child attended at kindergarten’s SMSP from 16 provinces. To compared children’s eating habits according to their parent age group and residence area, the percentage of regularly breakfast eating were lower in ‘below 30 years old’ group and large city residence than ‘above 30 years old’ group and middle and small city residence. And taking breakfast item was partially different pattern according parent age, ‘below 30 years old’ group and large city child ate more bread and milk as breakfast than Korean style breakfast with steamed rice and soup and side dish. In the prefer types of school meal service, most prefer types of meal service was fully meal service at kindergarten, 79.1% subjects wanted this type. But ‘below 30 years old’ group’s parent answered ‘lunch box brings from home’ ratio was higher than ‘above 30 years old’ group. Most parents accepted the present meal cost and 63.8% of subjects was willing to pay more money to improve the quality of SMSP. Twenty-six precent parents was responded that no improvement children’s eating habit through SMSP. And they answered the key point of SMSP management was ‘cooking sanitation’ (65.1%) and ‘nutrition’ (50.0%) and they answered the urgent improvement point at SMSP was ‘improvement taste and quality of meal’ (62.6%). Kindergarten parents’ attitude about catering service as SMSP was not to prefer, but 10.4% of subjects answered that catering service is ideal meal service type in kindergarten and they expected the advantage of catering service was ‘convenience of foodservice’(40.7%) and ‘support foodservice facilities and labor’(32.4%) and they also pointed out disadvantage was ‘lower in meal freshness’(53.9%) and ‘sanitation problem’(51.9%). (Korean J Community Nutrition 10(2): 141 ~ 150, 2005)
    번역하기

    This Study investigated kindergarten parents’ attitude, satisfaction and demand in the school meal service programs (SMSP). The subjects were 2450 parents that their child attended at kindergarten’s SMSP from 16 provinces. To compared children’s...

    This Study investigated kindergarten parents’ attitude, satisfaction and demand in the school meal service programs (SMSP). The subjects were 2450 parents that their child attended at kindergarten’s SMSP from 16 provinces. To compared children’s eating habits according to their parent age group and residence area, the percentage of regularly breakfast eating were lower in ‘below 30 years old’ group and large city residence than ‘above 30 years old’ group and middle and small city residence. And taking breakfast item was partially different pattern according parent age, ‘below 30 years old’ group and large city child ate more bread and milk as breakfast than Korean style breakfast with steamed rice and soup and side dish. In the prefer types of school meal service, most prefer types of meal service was fully meal service at kindergarten, 79.1% subjects wanted this type. But ‘below 30 years old’ group’s parent answered ‘lunch box brings from home’ ratio was higher than ‘above 30 years old’ group. Most parents accepted the present meal cost and 63.8% of subjects was willing to pay more money to improve the quality of SMSP. Twenty-six precent parents was responded that no improvement children’s eating habit through SMSP. And they answered the key point of SMSP management was ‘cooking sanitation’ (65.1%) and ‘nutrition’ (50.0%) and they answered the urgent improvement point at SMSP was ‘improvement taste and quality of meal’ (62.6%). Kindergarten parents’ attitude about catering service as SMSP was not to prefer, but 10.4% of subjects answered that catering service is ideal meal service type in kindergarten and they expected the advantage of catering service was ‘convenience of foodservice’(40.7%) and ‘support foodservice facilities and labor’(32.4%) and they also pointed out disadvantage was ‘lower in meal freshness’(53.9%) and ‘sanitation problem’(51.9%). (Korean J Community Nutrition 10(2): 141 ~ 150, 2005)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "middle and high school teachers opinions of school food service programs. Korean Journal of Nu-trition 37" 37 (37): 701-711, 2004

    2 "The present state of schol meal service." 2004

    3 "Study on the control of school meal service." 2003

    4 "Statistic of womens life." 2001

    5 "Overweight amo-ng preschool children in Seoul" 6 (6): 6 121-129, 2001

    6 "Ministry of education & Human Resource Development Fod sanitation guide for school meal service." 2002,02

    7 "Ministry of Health and Welfare Report on the ac-tual state of day care center. November 10" 2002

    8 "Korean Fod & Drug Association" 2004

    9 "Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs Statistic of Korean womens health." 2003b

    10 "Korea Institute for Health and Social Afairs Health and nut-rition status of day care center children." 2003a

    1 "middle and high school teachers opinions of school food service programs. Korean Journal of Nu-trition 37" 37 (37): 701-711, 2004

    2 "The present state of schol meal service." 2004

    3 "Study on the control of school meal service." 2003

    4 "Statistic of womens life." 2001

    5 "Overweight amo-ng preschool children in Seoul" 6 (6): 6 121-129, 2001

    6 "Ministry of education & Human Resource Development Fod sanitation guide for school meal service." 2002,02

    7 "Ministry of Health and Welfare Report on the ac-tual state of day care center. November 10" 2002

    8 "Korean Fod & Drug Association" 2004

    9 "Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs Statistic of Korean womens health." 2003b

    10 "Korea Institute for Health and Social Afairs Health and nut-rition status of day care center children." 2003a

    11 "Influence of foodservice employees food safety training on fod safety knowledge and practices. Korean J Com-munity Nutrition 9" 9 (9): 597-605, 2004

    12 "Evaluation of Eating Behaviors of children in Early Childhood Education Institution. The Korean Home Economics Asociation 37" 37 (37): 69-83, 1999

    13 "Comparisons of children and their parents satisfaction of school lunch program in elementary school by food service system. The Korean Journal of Nutrition 31" 31 (31): 179-191, 1998

    14 "Assesment of preschool childrens fod preference according to the residing areas. J Korean Dietetic Ass 4" 4 (4): 1-12, 1998

    15 "Accomplishment of comprehension child care service" 2004

    16 "A study of the actual conditions of kindergar-ten meals program. The Korean Society for Early childhood Edu-cation 23" 23 (23): 261-285, 2003

    17 "A Study on the Nutritional Eva-luation and Food Service Mangement of Snacks in Early Childhood Education Institution. The Korean Home Economics Asociation 38" 38 (38): 99-112, 2000

    18 "2004 Spring Symposium. The Korea Asociation of child care and education" 157-171, 2004

    19 "//w.moe.go.kr Ministry of education & Human Resource" 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.15 1.15 1.13
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.28 1.21 1.764 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼