RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    직무 자율성과 선제 행동 간의 관계에 대한 개인-직무 적합성의 매개효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100505371

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Increasing competition and uncertainty in the business environment require employees to behave proactively in their workplace. While scholars have paid increasing attention to the role of proactive behavior in organizations, there is a paucity of research on the antecedents and mediating mechanisms of proactive behavior. To fill this gap, our study aims to examine the relationship between job
    autonomy and proactive behavior as well as the mediating role of person-job fit in this relationship. More specifically, our study focuses on innovative behavior, voice behavior, and taking charge as three critical forms of proactive behavior. We
    predicted positive relationships between job autonomy and the three forms of proactive behavior. Furthermore, we proposed that these relationships would be mediated by person-job fit To test these hypotheses, we collected survey-based data from 169 employee-
    supervisor dyads in ten Korean firms. The results of hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that job autonomy was significantly associated with innovative behavior, voice behavior, and taking charge. As predicted, we found significant relationships between job autonomy and person-job fit and between person-job fit and the three forms of proactive behavior. In addition, person-job fit significantly mediated the relationships between job autonomy and the three forms of proactive behavior. These findings provide meaningful implications for theory and practice.
    번역하기

    Increasing competition and uncertainty in the business environment require employees to behave proactively in their workplace. While scholars have paid increasing attention to the role of proactive behavior in organizations, there is a paucity of rese...

    Increasing competition and uncertainty in the business environment require employees to behave proactively in their workplace. While scholars have paid increasing attention to the role of proactive behavior in organizations, there is a paucity of research on the antecedents and mediating mechanisms of proactive behavior. To fill this gap, our study aims to examine the relationship between job
    autonomy and proactive behavior as well as the mediating role of person-job fit in this relationship. More specifically, our study focuses on innovative behavior, voice behavior, and taking charge as three critical forms of proactive behavior. We
    predicted positive relationships between job autonomy and the three forms of proactive behavior. Furthermore, we proposed that these relationships would be mediated by person-job fit To test these hypotheses, we collected survey-based data from 169 employee-
    supervisor dyads in ten Korean firms. The results of hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that job autonomy was significantly associated with innovative behavior, voice behavior, and taking charge. As predicted, we found significant relationships between job autonomy and person-job fit and between person-job fit and the three forms of proactive behavior. In addition, person-job fit significantly mediated the relationships between job autonomy and the three forms of proactive behavior. These findings provide meaningful implications for theory and practice.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신유형, "팀 수준 개인-조직 및 개인-직무 적합성이 팀 수준 조직시민행동과 팀 효능감에 미치는 영향" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 1-35, 2008

    2 강영순, "코칭리더십, 기본심리욕구, 혁신행동, 조직시민행동의 구조적 관계" 대한경영학회 26 (26): 1909-1928, 2013

    3 김해룡, "직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 셀프리더십의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 199-229, 2011

    4 김정진, "종업원의 발언행동과 발언풍조에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 1-22, 2012

    5 박양규, "상사와 부하간 리더쉽 행동특성의 적합성과 조직 유효성에 대한 효과" 23 (23): 145-161, 1999

    6 박종훈, "리더십과 followership간의 적합성이 조직유효성에 미치는 효과 : 변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십 비교" 24 (24): 87-115, 2001

    7 김미희, "개인-직무 적합성과 과업 및 맥락 성과 :과업 중요성과 자율성의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 20 (20): 93-128, 2012

    8 최보인, "개인-조직 적합성과 개인-직무 적합성의 효과성 연구" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 199-232, 2011

    9 Ohly, S., "Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study" 31 : 543-565, 2010

    10 Shin, Y., "What makes a group of good citizens? The role of perceived group-level fit and critical psychological states in organizational teams" 83 : 531-552, 2010

    1 신유형, "팀 수준 개인-조직 및 개인-직무 적합성이 팀 수준 조직시민행동과 팀 효능감에 미치는 영향" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 1-35, 2008

    2 강영순, "코칭리더십, 기본심리욕구, 혁신행동, 조직시민행동의 구조적 관계" 대한경영학회 26 (26): 1909-1928, 2013

    3 김해룡, "직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 셀프리더십의 매개효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 199-229, 2011

    4 김정진, "종업원의 발언행동과 발언풍조에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 1-22, 2012

    5 박양규, "상사와 부하간 리더쉽 행동특성의 적합성과 조직 유효성에 대한 효과" 23 (23): 145-161, 1999

    6 박종훈, "리더십과 followership간의 적합성이 조직유효성에 미치는 효과 : 변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십 비교" 24 (24): 87-115, 2001

    7 김미희, "개인-직무 적합성과 과업 및 맥락 성과 :과업 중요성과 자율성의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 20 (20): 93-128, 2012

    8 최보인, "개인-조직 적합성과 개인-직무 적합성의 효과성 연구" 한국인사관리학회 35 (35): 199-232, 2011

    9 Ohly, S., "Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study" 31 : 543-565, 2010

    10 Shin, Y., "What makes a group of good citizens? The role of perceived group-level fit and critical psychological states in organizational teams" 83 : 531-552, 2010

    11 LePine, J. A., "Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability" 86 (86): 325-336, 2001

    12 Woodman. R., "Toward a tbeory of organizational creativity" 18 (18): 293-321, 1993

    13 Pearson, A. E., "Tough-Minded Ways to Get Innovative" 80 (80): 117-125, 1988

    14 Morgeson, F. P., "The work design questionnaire(WDQ): Developing and vaildating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work" 91 (91): 1324-1339, 2006

    15 Wu, C., "The role of attachment styles in shaping proactive behavior: An intra-individual analysis" 85 (85): 523-530, 2012

    16 Baron, R. M., "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

    17 Breaugh, J. A., "The measurement of work autonomy" 38 (38): 551-570, 1985

    18 Demerouti, E., "The job demands-resources model of burnout" 86 (86): 499-512, 2001

    19 Cable, D. M., "The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions" 87 (87): 875-884, 2002

    20 Parker, S. K., "That’s not my job’: Developing flexible employee work orientations" 40 (40): 899-929, 1997

    21 Edwards, J. R., "Ten difference score myths" 4 : 265-387, 2001

    22 Staw, B. M., "Task revision: A neglected form of work performance" 33 (33): 534-559, 1990

    23 Morrison, E. W., "Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change" 42 (42): 403-419, 1999

    24 Snedecor, G. W., "Statistical Methods. Seventh Edition" The Iowa State University Press 1980

    25 Sobel, M. E., "Sociological methodology" Jossey-Bass 290-312, 1982

    26 Axtell, C. M., "Shop floor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas" 73 (73): 265-228, 2000

    27 Dutton, J. E., "Selling issues to top management" 18 (18): 397-428, 1993

    28 Frese, M., "Research in organizational behavior. Vol. 23" 133-187, 2001

    29 Kanter. R., "Research in organizational behavior, (Vol 10)" JAI Press 169-211, 1988

    30 Graham, J. W., "Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8)" JAI Press 1-52, 1986

    31 Grant, A. M., "Research in Organizational Behavior, 28" 3-34, 2008

    32 Ashford, S. J., "Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations" 29 (29): 769-799, 2003

    33 Cunningham, C. E., "Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological, and behavioral correlates" 75 : 377-392, 2002

    34 Nunnaily, J. C., "Psychometrtc Theory (2nd ed.)" McGraw-Hill 1978

    35 West, M. A., "Psychological and Organizational Strategies" Wiley 1990

    36 Axtell, C. M., "Promoting role breadth self-efficacy through involvement, work redesign and training" 56 (56): 113-131, 2003

    37 Ashford, S. J., "Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment" 58 (58): 67-79, 1985

    38 Crant, J. M., "Proactive behavior in organizations" 26 (26): 435-462, 2000

    39 LePine, J. A., "Predicting voice behavior in work groups" 83 (83): 853-868, 1998

    40 Withey, M. J., "Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect" 34 (34): 521-539, 1989

    41 Bakker, A. B., "Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations" 29 (29): 147-154, 2008

    42 Den Hartog, D. N., "Personal initiative, commitment, and affect at work" 80 (80): 601-622, 2007

    43 Frese, M., "Personal initiative at work: Differences between east and west germany" 39 (39): 37-63, 1996

    44 Kristof, A. L., "Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications" 49 (49): 1-49, 1996

    45 Ostroff, C., "Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition" 45 (45): 849-874, 1992

    46 Morrison, E. W., "Newcomers relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization" 45 (45): 1149-1160, 2002

    47 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.)" Prentice-Hall 1998

    48 Hackman, J. R., "Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory" 16 (16): 250-279, 1976

    49 Parker, S. K., "Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work" 91 (91): 636-652, 2006

    50 Caldwell, D. F., "Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison, process" 75 (75): 648-657, 1990

    51 Crawford, E. R., "Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test" 95 (95): 834-848, 2010

    52 Sonnentag, S., "Job control and job stressors as predictors of proactive work behavior: Is role breadth self-efficacy the link?" 25 (25): 412-431, 2012

    53 Parker, S. K., "Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness" Sage 1998

    54 Saks, A. M., "Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit" 87 (87): 646-654, 2002

    55 Edwards, J. R., "International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 6)" Wiley 283-357, 1991

    56 Endler, N. S., "Interactional psychology and personality" Hemisphere 1976

    57 West, M. A., "Innovation among health care professionals" 4 : 173-184, 1989

    58 Rusbult, G. E., "Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction" 31 (31): 599-627, 1988

    59 Van Dyne, L., "Helping and voice extra-role behavior: Evidence of construct and predictive validity" 41 (41): 108-119, 1998

    60 Hackman, J. R., "Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" Wiley 1455-1624, 1983

    61 Parker, S. K., "From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy" 49 (49): 447-469, 2000

    62 Zhou, J., "Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance" 83 (83): 261-276, 1998

    63 Ashford, S. J., "Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information" 32 (32): 370-398, 1983

    64 Griffin, R. W., "Effects of work redesign on employee perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors: A long-term investigation" 34 (34): 425-443, 1991

    65 Lauver, K. J., "Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit" 59 (59): 454-470, 2001

    66 Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed." The Free Press 1995

    67 Hackman, J. R., "Development of the job diagnostic survey" 60 (60): 159-170, 1975

    68 Scott, S. G., "Determinants of innovative behavior: A pathmodel of individual innovation in the workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

    69 De Jong, J. P. J., "Determinants of coworkers innovative behaviour: An investigation into knowledge intensive services" 7 (7): 189-212, 2003

    70 Lonner, W. J., "Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values" Sage 1980

    71 Frese, M., "Control and complexity in work and the development of personal initiative: A four wave longitudinal structural equation model of occupational socialization. Working paper" University of Giessen 2000

    72 Kristof-Brown, A. L., "Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit" 58 : 281-342, 2005

    73 Van Dyne, L., "Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional construct" 40 (40): 1359-1392, 2003

    74 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

    75 Van de Ven. A. H., "Central problems in the management of innovation" 32 (32): 590-607, 1986

    76 Nemeth, C. J., "Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 22)" Academic Press 175-210, 1989

    77 Hornung, S., "Active on the job-proactive in change: How autonomy at work contributes to employee support for organizational change" 43 (43): 401-426, 2007

    78 Griffin, M. A., "A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts" 50 (50): 327-347, 2007

    79 Saks, A. M., "A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes" 50 (50): 395-426, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
    2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
    외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼