스마트 디바이스 제품속성이 제품수용에 미치는 영향 = 기능적 동기와 쾌락적 동기의 매개효과

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 UTAUT이론을 바탕으로 정보통신 기술수용연구에서 상대적으로 간과되어왔던 다양한 제품특성(제품기능성, 디자인, 사용편의성)이 기능적 동기(노력기대, 성과기대)와 쾌락적 동기(인지된 즐거움)에 미치는 영향과 사용동기가 스마트 디바이스 사용의도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 규명하고자 진행되었다. 서울을 포함하여 5대광역시의 스마트 디바이스 사용자 800명을 비례할당방식으로 조사한 결과, 기능적 동기(노력기대, 성과기대)와 쾌락적 동기(인지된 즐거움)는 스마트 디바이스 사용의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 스마트 디바이스의 디자인은 인지된 즐거움에, 사용용이성은 노력기대와 성과기대에 각각 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 제품기능성은 노력기대와 성과기대에 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between product attributes of smart device and user acceptance of technology. Moreover, the authors examined mediating effect of utilitarian and hedonic motivation between product attributes and user acceptance. Previous researches focused on user attitude and behavior intention of new technology based on Technology Acceptance Model(TAM). However, differently from previous researches, which are focused on user attitude like perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, this research emphasized the relationship product attributes such as product functionality, design, and convenience and user motivation both utilitarian(effort expectancy and performance expectancy) and hedonic motivation(perceived enjoyment) according to UTAUT model. The results shows that 3 motivation variables(effort expectancy, performance expectancy, and perceived enjoyment) have positive impacts on user acceptance intention of smart device. product design has positive relationship to perceived enjoyment and product convenience has positive relationship to both effort and performance expectancy. Furthermore, 3 motivation variables play a full mediation between product attributes and user acceptance intention of new technology. However, product functionality has no relationship to both effort and performance expectancy. Research contribution, implications, and further research directions are discussed at the end of the paper.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설설정
• Ⅳ. 실증분석 및 결과
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박성빈, "인터넷과 스마트 디바이스" 13 (13): 31-38, 2012

2 오종철, "인터넷 서비스 수용의 영향요인: UTAUT모형에 대한 재평가" 한국경영학회 39 (39): 55-79, 2010

3 김종기, "스마트폰의 특성이 지속구매의도에 미치는 영향: 유희성의 조절효과를 고려하여" 대한경영학회 25 (25): 2021-2045, 2012

4 이영준, "스마트폰의 기능적 특성이 스마트폰 사용의도에 미치는 영향: 성별에 따른 차이분석" 한국인터넷전자상거래학회 12 (12): 139-160, 2012

5 이용일, "스마트폰 유통에 따른 대학생의 기술 수용의도 및 만족에 관한 연구" 한국유통경영학회 13 (13): 93-110, 2010

6 최원석, "스마트폰 기능적 속성의 중요도에 관한연구" 298-297, 2010

7 김영채, "모바일 특성과 IT 특성, 그리고 관여가 스마트폰 애플리케이션 만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 패션 애플리케이션 중심으로" 국제e-비즈니스학회 12 (12): 49-77, 2011

8 Kotler Philip, "마케팅입문" 경문사 2013

9 이학식, "구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 6.0" 법문사 2007

10 전새하, "공공부문 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 엘지씨엔에스 10 (10): 97-112, 2011

11 Barry J. Babin, "Work and/or Fun : Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value" 20 (20): 644-656, 1994

12 Y. H. Hung, "User Acceptance of e-government Services" 97 : 2007

13 H. Y. Wang, "User Acceptance of Mobile Internet based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology : Investigating the Determinants and Gender Differences" 38 (38): 415-426, 2010

14 Venkatesh, Viswanath, "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View" 27 (27): 425-478, 2003

15 Hans Van der Heijden, "User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems" 28 (28): 695-704, 2004

16 Fred D. Davis, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology : A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models" 35 (35): 982-1003, 1989

17 C. M. Chiu, "Understanding Web-based Learning Continuance Intention : the Role of Subjective Task Value" 45 (45): 194-201, 2008

18 X. Y. Xu, "Understanding Users’ Continued Use of Online Games: An Application of UTAUT2 in Social Network Games" 58-65, 2014

19 Zhou Tao, "Understanding Mobile Internet Continuance Usage from the Perspectives of UTAUT and Flow" 27 (27): 207-218, 2011

20 박일순, "UTAUT 기반 모바일 신용카드 서비스의 사용자 수용 모형에 관한 연구" 국제e-비즈니스학회 13 (13): 551-574, 2012

21 Xu Heng, "The Rffects of Privacy Voncerns and Personal Innovativeness on Potential and Experienced Customers’Adoption of Location-based Services" 19 (19): 137-149, 2009

22 Igbaria, Magid, "The Respective Roles of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Fun in the Acceptance of Microcomputer Technology" 13 (13): 349-361, 1994

23 James Y. L. Thong, "The Effects of Post-adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance" 64 (64): 799-810, 2006

24 John F. Sherry Jr, "The Dark Side of the Gift" 28 (28): 225-244, 1993

25 Kenneth C. Gehrt, "The Convenience of Catalog Shopping : Is There More to It Than Time?" 10 (10): 19-28, 1996

26 Peter H. Bloch, "Product Involvement as Leisure Behavior" 11 (11): 197-202, 1984

27 Rex B. Klein, "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling" Guilford Press 1998

28 Lu June, "Personal Innovativeness, Social Influences and Adoption of Wireless Internet Services via Mobile Technology" 14 (14): 245-268, 2005

29 Fred D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology" 13 (13): 319-340, 1989

30 T. Escobar-Rodríguez, "Online Purchasing Tickets for Low Cost Carriers : An Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT)Model" 43 : 70-88, 2014

31 Richard P. Bagozzi, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988

32 E. Fischer, "More Than a Labor of Love : Gender Roles and Christmas Gift Shopping" 17 (17): 333-345, 1990

33 Susan A. Brown, "Model of Adoption of Technology in Households : A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle" 29 (29): 399-426, 2005

34 P. Kotler, "Marketing Management: Analysis Planning Implementation and Control" Prentice Hall 1997

35 AbuShanab, Emad, "Internet Banking in Jordan: The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT)Perspective" 9 (9): 78-97, 2007

36 Zhou Tao, "Integrating TTF and UTAUT to Explain Mobile Banking User Adoption" 26 (26): 760-767, 2010

37 Terry L. Childers, "Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior" 77 (77): 511-535, 2002

38 Elizabeth C. Hirschman, "Hedonic Consumption : Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions" 46 (46): 92-101, 1982

39 Fred D. Davis, "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace" 22 (22): 1111-1132, 1992

40 Gordon C. Bruner II, "Explaining Consumer Acceptance of Handheld Internet Devices" 58 (58): 553-558, 2005

41 Fornell, Claes, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

42 William B. Dodds, "Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations" 28 (28): 307-319, 1991

43 Schaupp, Ludwig Christian, "E-file Adoption: A Study of US Taxpayers’ Intentions" 26 (26): 636-644, 2010

44 Chitturi, Ravindra, "Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Benefits" 72 (72): 48-63, 2008

45 Venkatesh, Viswanath, "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology : Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology" 36 (36): 157-178, 2012

46 M. M. M. A. Riffai, "Big TAM in Oman : Exploring the Promise of On-line Banking, Its Adoption by Customers and the Challenges of Banking in Oman" 32 (32): 239-250, 2012

47 Fishbein, Martin, "Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research" Addison-Wesley 1975

48 Verkasalo, Hannu, "Analysis of Users and Non-users of Smartphone Applications" 27 (27): 242-255, 2010

49 I. Im, "An International Comparison of Technology Adoption : Testing the UTAUT Model" 48 (48): 1-8, 2011

50 Pratibha A. Dabholkar, "An Attitudinal Model of Technology-based Self-service : Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors" 30 (30): 184-201, 2002

51 J. K. Park, "Adoption of Mobile Technologies for Chinese Consumers" 8 (8): 196-206, 2007

52 John F. Sherry Jr, "A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market" 17 (17): 13-30, 1990

53 G. A. Jr. Churchill, "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs" 16 (16): 64-73, 1979

54 Robert A. Westbrook, "A Motivation-based Shopper Typology" 61 (61): 78-103, 1985